User talk:Amicable always

Archives

Stop

Please stop spamming articles, creating a ruckus, and inserting promotional content, and harassing admins, for admins know what they are doing, if this persists, I will have to get Wikipedia involved! Thank you! --Gumshoe97 (talk) 23:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So as per you discussing means harassing? I don't think so and I definitely know my article content was accurate. Hence I am discussing on article talk page as per Wiki guidelines. Amicable always (talk) 01:37, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one going around using honorifics and glorifying a convicted pedophile, so please don't give me this crap. —SpacemanSpiff 02:17, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Show one single diff in which I have used the honorific. Honorifics might be added by other editors, so remove honorific instead of deleting the entire article. In fact, this word "pedophile" shows your bias. Because he was not convicted for "pedophile" but for sexual harassment and that case is still in High Court, but that doesn't give you right to simply delete an article which is about Tulsi Pujan Diwas, a festival widely celebrated now.Amicable always (talk) 02:22, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to carry your propaganda work outside Wikipedia, not here, as for any bias you're accusing me of, he is convicted under The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, so please keep your bovine excrement away from here. —SpacemanSpiff 02:29, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Although Asaram Bapu started this initiative now it is widely accepted by Hindus all over India as proved by references. And hence this festival finds a place on Wiki. Let me give you few examples: 1- Alamo_Christian_Foundation was founded by Tony Alamo who was sentenced to 150 years in federal prison for sex. But still that page exists on Wiki. 2- Shoko Asahara was founded by Shoko Asahara who was sentenced to death by hanging under Japanese law. But still that page exists on Wiki. 3- Lord Our Righteousness Church was founded by Wayne Bent who was sentenced to 18 years. But still that page exists on Wiki. 4- Christian Heritage New Zealand was founded by Graham Capill who was sentenced to nine-year imprisonment term in 2005 after multiple charges of child sexual abuse against girls younger than twelve. But still that page exists on Wiki. 5- Creativity Movement was founded by Matthew F. Hale who was sentenced to a 40-year prison term for soliciting an undercover FBI informant to kill a federal judge. But still that page exists on Wiki. And many more... So please try to understand that a good initiative "can" be started by a person who was convicted(case is still in high court and others involved in case got clean chit too). And Tulsi Pujan Diwas is one such initiative, and hence it's widely accepted by Indians.Amicable always (talk) 02:39, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am hindu too, and I find this very rude and disrespectful, so stop!! Gumshoe97 (talk) 13:10, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

please stop your shitty edits!! Gumshoe97 (talk) 16:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And you please stop deleting references instead of calling my edits with slangs Amicable always (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Carry your shitty propaganda outside of wikipedia Gumshoe97 (talk) 16:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gumshoe97This shows your ethics[[1]], you are continuously spamming my talk page, when I initiated discussion on your talk page, you simply deleted! great! Amicable always (talk) 16:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported you, and please stop being a dirt bag, you are very insulting toward my religion, so please stop!!!!! Gumshoe97 (talk) 16:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HONESTLY

could you please stop this propaganda nonsense, because i find it very insulting!Gumshoe97 (talk) 17:03, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You please stop spamming on my talk page. And please talk using sensible words. Discuss on article page and stop deleting the talk page discussions. Amicable always (talk) 17:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FINE, LETS DISCUSS THIS ON THE ARTICLE PAGE!!!!!!Gumshoe97 (talk) 17:06, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The reason your article is dubbed as promotional is because of how it promotes Vasaram Bapu, and the fact that most of the references promote him to, you are welcome to re-write the page without the promotional content, but for now the article is going to be deleted, and won't be restored. Gumshoe97 (talk) 13:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Those are news references and you cannot get biased and removed those references. Entire article is about plant Tulsi only. Except for 1 single mention of the person who started it.Amicable always (talk) 13:14, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that why there is an article about Tulsi? Gumshoe97 (talk) 13:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In this diff [2] it's clear that you only have a problem with his name. And that's definitely a bias to have. Why do you want to have Tulsi Pujan Diwas article stating that it was started by an Indian cult leader by hiding his name, even when the news websites prove that it was started by him?

The news websites were just glorifying the pedophile, so answer my question what is the reason to create an article about tulisi, if one already exists, it is pretty clear that you were not creating an article, buy glorifying asaram bapu Gumshoe97 (talk) 13:28, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is about "Tulsi Pujan Diwas festival celebrated on a particular day 25th Dec". That article is generic about Tulsi plant. Hope you got the difference between being specific and being generic. The websites are not at all glorifying. Those are the same websites that have published a lot of negativity for him which is already there on his page, but you are not deleting those references. So when something is negative that's correct, when something is positive that's promotional? Is it?? Amicable always (talk) 13:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted all the promotional references for your info, and you can take your promotional propaganda outside of Wikipedia Gumshoe97 (talk) 13:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why those websites were promotional was all they were doing was glorifying the stupid pedophileGumshoe97 (talk) 13:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Repeating your statements doesn't make them true. Amicable always (talk) 14:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

same for you! Gumshoe97 (talk) 14:19, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

you keep repeating your statements, and that doesn't make it right!!!!Gumshoe97 (talk) 14:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This shows your intention anyway: [3] Amicable always (talk) 14:32, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was a mistake that's not what i meant! Gumshoe97 (talk) 15:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amicable always (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not used any sock puppet account. My account has more than 220 edits and I have always followed the policy. Here[4] The reason stated is: "the other has never even touched the article." By that logic [User: Gumshoe97] should also be blocked, because he is also new to the article. But no, you just decided to block me. Especially when I was the target to personal abuse by User:Gumshoe97 He called me dirt bag, shitty and what not. He even deleted the discussion from his talk page when one of the admins warned him. If you see the edits which User:Gumshoe97 did on my talk page. It's personal abuse. You people are calling my edits promotional but no, they are based on news references. And if some user started participating in the discussion. What can I do? I request you to unblock me, and instead take some action on User:Gumshoe97 who was simply abusing and deleting the article on which multiple people spent their time Amicable always (talk) 02:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was confirmed, there's no doubt about this. Yamla (talk) 11:17, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello

hello Amicable always, I think you remember me (Gumshoe97) I just wanted to say that I am sorry for all of my actions against you--Sir Bond 007 (James The Bond 007) (talk) 19:53, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]