User talk:HastyBriar321

Welcome!

Hello, HastyBriar321! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 00:24, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

June 2017

Hello, I'm Guanaco. I noticed that in this edit to 2016 Ohio State University attack, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Guan aco 00:39, 6 June 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! General Ization ^Talk 00:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HastyBriar321, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi HastyBriar321! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Recent edit to 2016 Minnesota mall stabbing

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from 2016 Minnesota mall stabbing without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:33, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Murder of Milly Dowler, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Do not delete text without giving valid reason and make use of appropriate box at foot of article. David J Johnson (talk) 18:22, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree - 220 of ^Borg 05:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Hi HastyBriar321! I see that you have been changing various links; the particular ones I have noticed are 2017 Las Vegas shooting and 2015 San Bernardino attack. The previous wording of these links was acceptable because they were something called redirects. Redirects are common or alternative names for an article, eg USA redirects to United States. As per WP:NOTBROKEN, there is no need to "correct" these types of links. There is no need to change [[2017 Las Vegas shooting]] to [[2017 Las Vegas shooting|Las Vegas shooting]] as the redirect takes care of that automaticity. I hope this makes sense. If you have any questions, do feel free to ask. Happy editing! Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 20:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of terrorist incidents in August 2017

Hi, I've seen you removed Charlottesville attack to List of terrorist incidents in August 2017. Please do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Do not delete text without giving valid reason and make use of appropriate box at foot of article. Givibidou (talk) 11:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Givibidou (talk) 22:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GG. HastyBriar321 (talk) 23:11, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How am I a sockpuppet?... HastyBriar321 (talk) 08:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You guys didn't even open a sockpuppet investigation towards me; what proof do you have? HastyBriar321 (talk) 09:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HastyBriar321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet of this DisuseKid character, and I'm not sure how this even came up. A sockpuppet investigation into me wasn't even opened; I could've defended myself there. I would just like an explanation into how this conclusion was reached. HastyBriar321 (talk) 20:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Placing CU block -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 20:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CheckUser evidence has determined that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse.

Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

-- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 20:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: To answer your unblock request, this conclusion was reached likely on technical evidence. I have additionally checked and see enough technical evidence to CU block you

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

HastyBriar321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet of this DisuseKid character, and I'm not sure how this even came up. A sockpuppet investigation into me wasn't even opened; I could've defended myself there. No one's even answering my question as to how that conclusion was reached. I just want an explanation so then I could properly defend myself. HastyBriar321 (talk) 20:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am not a sockpuppet of this DisuseKid character, and I'm not sure how this even came up. A sockpuppet investigation into me wasn't even opened; I could've defended myself there. No one's even answering my question as to how that conclusion was reached. I just want an explanation so then I could properly defend myself. [[User:HastyBriar321|HastyBriar321]] ([[User talk:HastyBriar321#top|talk]]) 20:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a sockpuppet of this DisuseKid character, and I'm not sure how this even came up. A sockpuppet investigation into me wasn't even opened; I could've defended myself there. No one's even answering my question as to how that conclusion was reached. I just want an explanation so then I could properly defend myself. [[User:HastyBriar321|HastyBriar321]] ([[User talk:HastyBriar321#top|talk]]) 20:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a sockpuppet of this DisuseKid character, and I'm not sure how this even came up. A sockpuppet investigation into me wasn't even opened; I could've defended myself there. No one's even answering my question as to how that conclusion was reached. I just want an explanation so then I could properly defend myself. [[User:HastyBriar321|HastyBriar321]] ([[User talk:HastyBriar321#top|talk]]) 20:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}