Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ziehm Imaging

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ziehm Imaging

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

De-prodded without improvement or rationale. Searches did not turn up anything other than mentions or WP:ROUTINE articles. Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:41, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:58, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No Opinion But a little bit of background for German readers: There was a discussion prior to our article creation on deWiki. German article was a lot later created by a SPA, not the user who created our article. Same user also initated the discussion above. Agathoclea (talk) 12:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This company, for medicine, is notable because of the introduction of the first flat panel for X ray. This changed all the market because you could capture the images by a computer. EstonianMan (talk) 13:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. unless there is much stronger third party evidence that they actually did create the first imaging device that permitted computer capture of xray images. From the sources, it seems more likely that they invented a relatively minor modification. Our article onthe type of device [[1]], has a 2006 references; their device has one from only 2010. DGG ( talk ) 03:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:19, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- an unremarkable private company going about its business; no value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 10:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.