Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Pets
Appearance
Boxes on this topic are all but userfied. The remaining boxes can be easily moved. Rfrisbietalk 18:51, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: The majority of “pet” userboxes have been moved to userspace. These and the boxes that remain in templatespace all are listed at User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/Pets per WP:GUS. If the consensus is to keep this page as part of the Wikipedia:Userboxes gallery, then I believe the related boxes should be moved back to templatespace. If the consensus is to delete this page, then the vast majority of the other life/interest/etc. gallery pages and their boxes probably should go the way of WP:GUS as well. If no consensus is reached, then there you have it…another day in the life of userboxes. Rfrisbietalk 18:51, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep (and apparently hence move boxes back to template space). Ian¹³/t 19:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Ian. - LA @ 20:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Question:So the four templates left are going to be Germanized Real Soon Now™? I'm just curious why you nominated this before clearing it out entirely, and want to make sure I understand what's going on here. -- nae'blis 21:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- This WP:GUS thing is still very ambiguous. I'm "calling the question" to find out if this page is "Good to go"™ or should be resurrected. Rfrisbietalk 21:18, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. However, this section should really be expanded. Bibliomaniac15 21:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Abstain I won't mind either way - WP:GUS is a means to end the userbox debate, but if the people who pressed for the removal of boxes (from templatespace or otherwise) changed their mind I won't complain. If not, WP:GUS works fine too. CharonX/talk 23:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)