User talk:CanadianCaesar/Archive six

Archives
Archive I
Archive II
Archive III
Archive IV
Archive V

Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave a new message

Please sign comments (~~~~)

User: Sid16higher-resistance

hey Caesar , my Name is Sid and I am new to Wikipedia. According to me , you did the right thing by deleting my article and I show you my full support. Thank you Sid

User:Fuckmother

Now that's funny. :) Thanks. Wikibofh_(talk) 21:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dante

If I linked The Howling twice, it was because the system ignored my edits.Scottandrewhutchins 00:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC)Scottandrewhutchins[reply]

Imasmartguy

I was recently blocked by you, I didn't do anything! Unblock me please!

Impersonators

I apologize. I will say though that I had no idea he was referring to you. --Woohookitty^(meow) 01:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

moving

dude why are you moving the iran pages? and what have you done with sassanid empire page?? --Spahbod 03:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Angela Beesley.

Excuse me, I have a question about Angela Beesley. Is she also wikipedia Co-founder like Jimbo Wales? In my opinion, She is 2nd cofounder of Wikipedia. Is it right? I'm just curious. Please, reply in my talk-page. *~Daniel~* ☎ 04:04, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So, Jimbo Wales's assistant is Larry Sanger? But her(Angela's) occupation is not Co-founder?*~Daniel~* ☎ 04:47, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

Thanks so much for the adminship offer CC. I've been around long enough that I'm probably past due for a nom. There's much I like about not being one: more anonymity and, I honestly believe, a better perspective on the actions admins undertake. However, it would be helpful for things like page moves, reverting quickly on my watchlist, and arbitrarily blocking users ;). I've already closed keeps and I could probably help out more.

In any event, I'll be editing intermittently for most of July after the tenth so it would be best to wait. Perhaps in August or at the beginning of September. I'll let you know. Thanks again, Marskell 13:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Spahbod

This user is requesting an unblock, you've blocked as "could be Willy", but I'm not sure why you think that. Can you take a look into this. Thanks --pgk^(talk) 09:56, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with User:Spahbod

He is messing up the articles Kizilbash and Safavids. Need help! Tājik 12:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, please take a look at user:tajiks talk page, i offered at least 3 times to discuss the matter, he have not responded to me once, instead he reverts my edits, calls them vandalism, sends me warnings and reports me to admins! --Spahbod 12:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a content dispute to me, and I don't think I'm the best person to look into it. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 18:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal creates sockpuppet

The user you blocked - User:Teh Bwniater is back as User:Power Bwn, adding that image, Image:Bwnt.jpg. feydey 11:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

Yes, it is. Good catch. I blocked. Don't let him get under your skin. Being a Wikipedia volunteer is something we do for pleasure, right?. If you find yourself too putoff by him, take a break from dealing with him. I'm saying this from experience. : - ) Take care, FloNight ^talk 19:27, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"AOL, has been blocked for an hour now"

and still is..

User_talk:152.163.100.0/24

In more ways than one, as the block is also affecting registered users--172.144.86.145 06:34, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Constitution of Belgium

I have added the "written" to the first sentence of the article. I hope it will do as both the Flemish and French versions do not have any special intro. Also, there is now an external link to the text of the constituion. If you have any other idea as to what might still be needed, drop me a line. RedZebra 08:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Thanks for the notice on my talk page. Dure 00:56, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA thanks

Hello CanadianCaesar/Archive six, and thank you for your strong support at my Request for Adminship, which succeeded with an overwhelming final count of (105/2/0). I was very pleased with the outpouring of kind words from the community that has now entrusted me with these tools, from the classroom, the lesson in human psychology and the international resource known as Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. (It's also worth noting that YOUR RfA was the first one I ever commented on!) Please feel free to leave me plenty of requests, monitor my actions (through the admin desk on my userpage) and, if you find yourself in the mood, listen to some of what I do in real life. In any case, keep up the great work and have a fabulous day. Grand master ka 06:01, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy Do

Never really left, I have alot of work right now and I just moved into a new place (not internet accessed yet). Typing this from a cafe, actually. Thanks for asking though! See you 'round, noble wikipedian! Hamster Sandwich 01:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Advice

Hail Caesar, Prose in Gremlins isn't bad, but since you asked I played around with the background section. I sort of rearranged the paragraphs and added a reference to the gremlins and WWII info. I'll look at the section in casting if you want. I don't have a lot of time tonight. Someone has a tag on the Gizmo toy image, so it might be a good idea to find a free image (if possible) in case this one is targetted for deletion. Good to hear from you again. Dmoon1 03:01, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Dmoon1 04:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AOL Collateral Damage

Sorry to bother you, but Hal the Chicken (talk · contribs · page moves · current autoblocks · block log) is causing quite a bit of collateral damage, as is Sean the Shark (talk · contribs · page moves · current autoblocks · block log), as are virtually all the other "USERNAME the ANIMAL" Vandals--AOL user 16:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template

I know you may not be a fan of the new template, but I hope you can make some suggestions so we can find something we can both find acceptible. It's about time we have a decent uniform template for SCC cases. Anyway, please comment on Template_talk:SCCInfoBox when you have the time. --PullUpYourSocks 12:55, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm...

Curious...how do we know they were created by that user? --HappyCamper 17:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:AN. Note also the overlapping interests (Wikimedia, Wikipedians with articles), as well as the fact that the articles have been edited by typically Amorrowish IPs and have been referenced in Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles by Amorrowish IPs. Plus I'm feeling rouge today. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 17:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

King's College DNA controversy

I was just leaving a message on the talk page of this article (King's College DNA controversy and when I submitted my post I got a message to say that you had deleted the talk page as an orphan talk page. This must mean that the article was deleted just after an edit I made to it. Can you find out what happened, as far as I know the article wasn't VfD. Thanks for any help. Alun 17:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick response. I was myself having problems with someone who was working on this article as they kept removing whole swathes of the Rosalind Franklin article and putting them into this article, without any discussion on the talk page at all. Thanks again. Alun 17:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"I deleted both the article and the talk page. There was no AfD. It was deleted per WP:CSD- created by an extremely dangerous banned user. If you wish to recreate the article (using your words, not his), you are certainly welcome." (source)

I think it would be useful to have the article King's College DNA controversy since it is about what is one of the most well known scientific controversies in biology. Please direct me to the evidence showing that the article was created by a banned user. I am puzzled by the idea of "using your words, not his". The material used to create the King's College DNA controversy was cut from existing Wikipedia articles about the people who were at the center of the controversy. I see no reason why I should not undelete the article. Can you explain? --JWSchmidt 20:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sick of having to justify myself about fighting this user. Ask Jimbo Wales who he is and see how he feels about him. Ask SlimVirgin. Ask FloNight or Nunh-huh. See above for evidence. Don't harrass me. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 20:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How is asking for information harassment? --JWSchmidt 21:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JWSchmidt, I understand that you mean no harm by your questions. From your point of view it seems perfectly reasonable to ask questions. Please look at it from CanadianCaesar's perspective. When an editor is trying to quicky revert these edits and must repeatedly stop and answer the same question over and over again, it gets frustrating. The volume of Amorrow's edits make it impossible for us to debate the value of them individually. That is the reason that Jimbo made his statement. All his edits should be reverted and all articles should be deleted. I hope this clarifies the situation a bit more. Take care, FloNight ^talk 12:16, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am willing to be supportive of any Wikipedian who is devoting time to trying to control vandals and disruptive users. CanadianCaesar, thanks for your efforts in dealing with this banned user. I now understand that this problem has existed for a long time while I was totally clueless. --JWSchmidt 13:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy

I see you speedied Andrew Sylvia. The notability may be an issue, but the page wasn't started by amorrow. In looking over a few of the links, the person seems of minor notability and there are several references that may establish that. [1], [2] and here DFNH profile. It's up to you as I won't override your deletion, but it seems of minor importance and was brought to my attention. Thanks.--MONGO 04:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me some credit. The identity of the creator requires a bit more research than simply looking at the username. Based on reasons I've outlined on this page, under "Hmmm", I'm convinced it is an Amorrow sockpuppet. The subject's notability wasn't even remotely connected to reasons for deletion, nor was "cabalism" as the subject claims. I didn't know it was Karmafist when I first deleted it, and in fact I supported his last RfA. I wouldn't care if someone restarted it from scratch. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 19:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. When I saw that it was deleted, I thought it was because of my past(still fairly bitter), not anything to do with Amorrow. I'll change my user page now. Thanks for the explanation. Karmafist 21:56, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

two things

one how do you make a bot on a wiki two how do you auto revert Djf2014 15:41, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block log

Heh, I think you accidently forgot to un-check "block anonymous users only" becuase you have autoblocked an IP address [3]. Oh dear. I will fix the autoblock, don't worry! :P Iolakana|^T 17:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth do you mean? "Block anonymous users only" can be checked, but it isn't the default. When you block any account the IP is always autoblocked. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 19:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, forgot to mention that it was an email username that you blocked, normally you should encourage them to create another account. Iolakana|^T 20:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see. I don't usually block them from creating new accounts. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 20:11, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"son of a bitch" block summary

May I ask why you blocked User:75.25.182.156 with such an inflammatory block summary? The edit that the IP made upon a cursory glance does not appear to be anything bad, but if you could fill me in on why you did that I'd much appreciate it. Thanks, Mo0[talk] 05:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It fits the pattern of the banned user Amorrow. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 05:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. I was filled in by some IRC guys in the meantime about the situation. Forgive me, I'm having trouble getting back up to speed. :) Mo0[talk] 05:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello : - ) FYI, Amorrow has his own IP address template it. See [4]. It is named pinktulip after one of his socks. FloNight ^talk 05:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CCRF

That's great news. Unfortunately, I'm going to be away for a few days, so you'll probably be on your own for the featured article day. As for my summer, it's been great. I forgot how nice it can be to have free time again. I'm probably a bit nuts to spend my free time away from law by writing about law, but I enjoy it. Hope your summer is going equally well. --PullUpYourSocks 15:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GangstaEB's RFA

Thanks for your oppose on my RFA. The final vote count was (0/10/0), so I am now an normal user. Feel free to let me know how I'm doing at any point in time or if you need anything. I can't give it though. Once again, thank you. Gang sta E B help me improve! 23:28, 31 July 2006 (UTC) I did steal this off Wickethewok's RFA thank-you too.[reply]

Just so you know, that hurt calling my Willy on Wheels. But I don't care, since I might leave. And how do you know that Sabertiger wasn't an impersonator of Willy? Gang sta E B help me improve! 23:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]