Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.V.S. Rathinam

S.V.S. Rathinam

S.V.S. Rathinam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

self promotion/advt R.srinivaas (talk) 10:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC) self promotion, not a notable person--R.srinivaas (talk) 16:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

• Comment. Just out of interest, how can someone who died in 1966 be self-promoting on Wikipedia in 2014? And how can a biography of a dead person be advertising? -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:43, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

• Promoted by family members R.srinivaas (talk) 13:28, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

• I guess it is going to take forever to remove / delete such pages, long live wikipediaR.srinivaas (talk) 13:29, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Since you've only just nominated it for deletion this is a pretty daft comment! -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:08, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  • indeed it is out of frustration :) R.srinivaas (talk) 06:22, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

---

• Delete. None of the claims show sufficient notability. Wikipedia is WP:NOTMEMORIAL. I've nominated his mentor, Pere Di Elbreil. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

• Keep -- 10,000 converts (even if in conjunction with another person); presidential gold medal. If correct, this sound like notability to me. The complaint does not seem to be that the content is inaccurate. I suspect the nom has an axe to grind, to remove notable Indian Christians nof an earlier generation. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:12, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
  • it is just a claim , where is the citation ? all the reference provided are bogus, i strongly oppose --R.srinivaas (talk) 04:19, 20 July 2014 (UTC)