User talk:B9 hummingbird hovering

Note

Hi, you left me a message quite a long time ago. I'm not really active and haven't logged in for a long time, but I had a go at making a response in case this issue still concerns you. Cheers, Factchecker atyourservice (talk) 23:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of the section Tulpas as explanation for unverified creatures

Hi, I saw that you had removed a section I had written in the article Tulpa. Why did you do that? You left no explanation. Personally, I saw no reason why you should removed it, and I think it deserves to be there, so I restored it again (this time a little reduced from last time). If you remove a complete section again like you did in this article, please motivate why you are doing so. --Ediug (talk) 00:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ediug, I don't remember the particular edit to which you make reference. It would have been if I found the content uncited or considered it invaluable in the sense of fanciful and ungrounded. Which would have been very unusual if I had as I am quite a conservative editor and preserve content in articles rather than delete it as a matter of course. I will give it a read I haven't read it for a very long time. Thanks for your contribution B9 hummingbird hovering^{(talk • contribs)} 12:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Buddhafield

The article Buddhafield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No third-party sources to establish notability of the article's subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SudoGhost 04:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Thoughtform

An article that you have been involved in editing, Thoughtform , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Andrewaskew (talk) 01:22, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thigle

The article Thigle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, no evidence that this is a valid definition, and only a dictionary definition in any case.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 17:48, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thigle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Thigle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Uberaccount (talk) 03:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

==============

I washed my hands of editing Wikipedia with the draconian cuber bullying I experienced. If anyone wishes to dialogue with me you can pursue me via: https://twitter.com/B9Joker108 B9 hummingbird hovering^{(talk • contribs)} 08:40, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]