User talk:Doc James/Archive 37

Archive 30

←

Archive 35

Archive 36

Archive 37

Archive 38

Archive 39

Archive 40

stop being a . . . .

When I first made the edits re. migraine, I asked for help with referencing. According to the link you sent me -- see the section on Books -- my sources are perfectly valid. I added page numbers. Thanks for the tip, it was helpful. Deleting questionable info for legitimate reasons is helpful. Gaming the system to justify deleting objective facts that come from valid sources just because it's information the Great James Heilman isn't familiar with is perhaps less constructive. In other words, you're being a real censored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.213.205 (talk) 06:40, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

The popular press is not a suitable reference. Have stated this a few times. Feel free to ask for a second opinion here WT:MED Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 06:42, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I have tried to shed some light on this situation on the migraine talk page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.213.205 (talk) 11:27, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi let's not flame folk like Jmh649; he's giving up precious time to help the overall value of Wiki, and he's only applying what are clear and open rules. You may be wellmeaning and sensible, but many others would try to put stuff up here might not be. Give him some help, he's doing a good and highly valuable work here. (JCJC777 (talk) 13:25, 25 November 2012 (UTC))

Agreed. I call a toast. Biosthmors (talk) 17:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Read your edits

With this edit, you left the sentence "The drug is, and is taken orally in capsules or as a suspension." Please check your edits for grammar before you save them and move on. » Swpb^{τ • ¢} 15:22, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for correcting it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:59, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Heading

Hello..You are editing my addition while I am working on it. I was working ion my references when you removed my entire entry. It would be nice if you waited for me to complete my work before correcting it. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medicinechief (talk • contribs) 00:55, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Please advise what you mean by improper formatting of my addition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medicinechief (talk • contribs) 01:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Your edits have been moved to your talk page. Please work on them their and get consensus before re adding. Thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:16, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urinary tract infection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diaphragm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 26 November 2012 (UTC)