Jump to content

Talk:Yakusugi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Choess (talk | contribs) at 23:29, 16 November 2012 (rate). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconJapan: Flora and fauna Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 07:50, January 6, 2025 (JST, Reiwa 7) (Refresh)
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Flora and fauna task force.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

WikiProject iconPlants Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WP: Japan Assessment Commentary

This article appears to have serious problems. Aside from its lack of references, the Lead states:

"The term "Yakusugi" refers to trees that are more than 1,000 years old." -- a statement that misses the pretty obvious connection to Yakushima, as evidenced not only by the yaku- phoneme, but the use of the same kanji. On this point, I was tempted to mark it as Stub-class, since there is no way to know how much more of the article has misleading information. Boneyard90 (talk) 18:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]