Jump to content

Talk:Gregory Reyes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JoshNarins (talk | contribs) at 18:57, 24 May 2012 (Timeline doesn't add up: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Untitled

CEO of a well known company, which has an article, and conviction for backdating stock options which received significant coverage in the press (with reference) would seem like enough to avoid a speedy deletion. AugustSauce 00:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the speedy/hangon tags. It seems to me there is a decent assertion of notability made. A search of Google News[1] came up with a large number of sources. - Fordan (talk) 01:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This very much reads like a press release for the CEO. Look at the part about the trial -- very strong use of adjectives and weasel words. It hardly seems unbiased, at all.209.6.93.248 (talk) 01:53, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline doesn't add up

The article says both " After the trial’s conclusion, however, Moore recanted her testimony, claiming that she had been bullied and pressured by the prosecution to give false testimony." and "Moore's conflicting statements were not disclosed during the trial, and prosecutor Adam Reeves made numerous statements to the jury using Moore's testimony to support his argument that Reyes had deceived Brocade’s finance department[.]"

The only conflicting statements that were mentioned occurred before and after the 1st trial, so, of course the prosecutor couldn't have been hiding them the jury during the trial. JoshNarins (talk) 18:57, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]