Jump to content

Talk:Le Droit Humain

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Comason (talk | contribs) at 21:43, 23 December 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconFreemasonry Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
◆  WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Comments on assessment

I ranked this with the orders such as DeMolay International and Order of the Eastern Star - there's definitely a case for it to be High-importance, where I put York Rite and Scottish Rite. I'm trying to save Top-importance for Freemasonry, Masonic lodge, etc. -- the things that are essential to all of us.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Views on abortion

In the talk page Talk:Catholicism and Freemasonry/Archive 10, it was claimed that since Le Droit Humain includes women in their lodges, many had adopted a feminist ideology and had contributed to the the pro-choice movement in order to repeal current or former laws prohibiting women from obtaining an abortion on demand. The article should perhaps provide relevant information on the social and political positions of Le Droit Human, and try to verify whether that includes support for a woman's right to an abortion. ADM (talk) 22:58, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added new section on British Federation Comason (talk) 21:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]