User talk:Mbz1

This userpage has been blanked. If this is your userpage, you can retrieve the contents of this page in the page history. Alternatively, if you would like it deleted, simply replace the content of this page with {{db-u1}}.


archives 1

Palestine-Israel editing restrictions:
* 0RR, excepting obvious vandalism and excluding Mbz1 userspace
* No submissions to Did You Know. Other aspects of the process are not restricted.

Nomination of Erotically shaped plants for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erotically shaped plants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erotically shaped plants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Prodego ^talk 01:18, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This got me thinking, a List of foods considered aphrodisiacs might cover some of the same ground and could have much better sourcing, as well (i.e. [1][2]). Qrsdogg (talk) 21:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Pepper

Well, I doubled its size and found some new refs, but it looks like a 5x expansion will be out of reach. How hard was it for you to find them? The sources I found said they're usually pretty rare (or at least they were when the books I saw were written). Qrsdogg (talk) 15:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is so strange! You were writing me a message at my talk page at the same time I was writing you a message at your talk page, and the message was about the same thing! I believe we should make a wish, and it is going to come true :-)--Mbz1 (talk) 15:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

lol, I hope so! Qrsdogg (talk) 15:31, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RFC on Roscelese‎

Would you be interested in certifying an RFC on Roscelese‎? ZHurlihee (talk) 15:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I am afraid I am not up to such an adventure.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:42, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks anyway. ZHurlihee (talk) 15:46, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck,if you go for it, but proceed carefully.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:54, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User talk pages

Users are at liberty to remove material from their talk page once they have read it. This restoration of material which was properly deleted isn't going to get your point over any more forcefully than the first time you posted it. Personally, I prefer never to remove material from my talk page even if I disagree with it; I think it forms a useful chronological record of discussions. But if Roscelese prefers to remove your post/s please don't revert that. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 15:53, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, Kim. I agree with you, it is not a good practice to restore removed messages, and usually I do not it. In this particular situation I did it for the record only to add a difference that I failed to add in my initial post. Besides as you probably saw as soon as I restored my post, I removed it again, saving Roscelese (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) a time of removing it herself :-). Regards.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:59, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let off

Really. Just learn to grow up. I've been gone for several months, and even after all that, you jumped in a conversation that had absolutely nothing to do with you to claim something of me that was unambiguously false. How old are you exactly? If it's 20+, I'm surprised you haven't yet learned to act like it, and cut out the petty crap. Are you seriously that full of yourself? Learn to drop it.— Dæ dαlus^{+ Contribs} 00:52, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What, only coming to my talk page instead of going crying at AN/I, and at willing admin talk page?? Surprise, surprise from the user that from its own admission is only good to hunt for socks :-).

Let me finish up my thought quoting IP's message posted to your talk page about your conduct Daedalus969 "I love the wikipedia concept, but when you're an example of the typical user, I'm sad to say that I just can't believe in it.". disclosure: I have no idea who this IP and what it is about, but I could not say it any better then IP did and with this I am kindly asking you to stay off my talk page once and for all.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:12, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]