Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Majdi achour (talk | contribs) at 10:57, 15 July 2011 (→Serge Ibaka glides in for a thunderous dunk while snagging a teddy bear during the Sprite Slam Dunk Contest: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Note: This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as CSD G6), or in articles for deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other XfD processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float
float
float
float
Enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

File:Escape Training Tower Pearl Harbor.jpg

Photo is from USNAVSUBASENLON archive, photo by Naval photographer, no other source for this picture is likely to exist, work of the United states government, public domain image -User:Pedant (talk) 05:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I have reset the timer, which gives you a week to add appropriate license information - see Help:File page. If this is established as PD, consider moving it to Commons. JohnCD (talk) 13:20, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not gonna work on a timer, I've been out of the navy for decades. This is already established as a public domain work taken by a US Naval Photographer, it's original was somewhere in the archives at the sub Base in Groton. It would be a nontrivial matter to provide more than this. Same goes with the picture of the escape training tower, which was also listed for deletion. I object to pictures with valid permissions being retroactively invalidated by new bureaucratic processes and deletionist editors. Either just reinstate the picture on my say-so, or contact USNAVSUBASENLON and ask them. User:Pedant (talk) 22:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Bright

reasoning -90.207.81.111 (talk) 14:27, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. References were added after the BLPprod, so it could have been removed. It would be useful to add more references if available, as I am not sure this shows notability to the standard required by WP:NACTOR. JohnCD (talk) 09:39, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Erin (Miguzi)

I searched for this forever just to find it has been deleted. There may be others like me. I was looking for a page about Cartoon Network's cancelled Miguzi segments, and there are NO MENTIONS in the Cartoon Network article. If you wanted to find the people interested in it, put a link there, as well as connect to broken links such as in Static Shock. -64.178.115.126 (talk) 18:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cartoon Network programing blocks, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Courcelles (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --B (talk) 18:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Top of the Pops, Volume 18

This album was number 1 in the national LP charts in 1971. For that fact alone it is notable. It has latterly been reissued both on CD and iTunes. -86.177.93.204 (talk) 12:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Top of the Pops, Volume 20

This LP was number 1 on the UK national album charts in 1971. It has been re-issued lately on CD. It is notable by virtue of its chart success. -86.177.93.204 (talk) 12:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. you can just reverse the convert to a redirect. Click on the history link above, and click undo next to the latest revision by SilkTork, and supply your reasoning in the edit summary. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Day Pitney LLP

would like to expand the article to be more comprehensive and in line with content guidelines -Tabajek (talk) 17:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done. The article was already userfied by Cirt and it's now located here. Please, before moving the page back to mainspace, ask for feedback at WP:FEEDBACK, so that your article will not be deleted again. Happy editing. Salvio Let's talk about it! 23:36, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fire ProWrestling S - 6Men Scramble Coverart.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Fire Pro Wrestling S: 6 Men Scramble. -Zundark (talk) 21:13, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%27m_not_sad_today

This movement has saved so many people. The least you can do is let a Wikipedia page be about it. -71.12.205.125 (talk) 00:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC) "[reply]

Qaiser Rafique Yasser

reasoning -Qryasser (talk) 04:35, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user JohnCD (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. January (talk) 11:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Afterfilm.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in After... (film). -Zundark (talk) 08:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done January (talk) 11:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dekemvriana 1944 SYNTAGMA.jpg

Did not have the time to provide a 'fair use' rational. -Sperxios (talk) 10:14, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This was the article's deletion log-line:

00:00, 29 June 2011 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Dekemvriana 1944 SYNTAGMA.jpg" ‎ (Deleted because "F6: Non-free media file with no non-free use rationale". (TW))

User User:Sfan00_IMG: indeed notified me about the forthcoming speedy deletion due to missing fair-use rational, but i did not had the time to review it. Now that i have the time, i can add the rational. I also claim that it ishould not have been deleted according to WP:CSD criteria.

Fair-use rational
Non-free media rationale for Greek Civil War
Article

Greek Civil War

Purpose of use

The photo accurately depicts a defining moment of modern greek history, the "dekemvriana", exactly at the moment the greek and english troops starting shooting against the demonstation of ~300.000 Athenians, just 3 months after the Germans had retreated from the country, on 3 Decemeber 1944. This episode was the major cause of the Greek Civil War that followed, some 1 and half years later.

Replaceable?

Cannot replace this historical shot.

Page was unfit for *speedy* deletion

It is also unfortunate that this picture was speedy-deleted since it had already survived a deletion discussion. If i remember correctly(cannot access history), the deletion-discussion was on the history of that page(or its discussion page) due to licesing problems, and the controversy had been fixed. Therefore, according to the opening paragraphs of WP:CSD, it should not have been *speedy* deleted.

  • Done. I have restored the image and reset the timer. Please add your fair use rationale to the image description page and remove the template once you have done so. Please note that your rationale should include not just what the image depicts, but an explanation of how "its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding" (see WP:NFCC#8). --B (talk) 18:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Petkim.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Petkim. -Zundark (talk) 10:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done January (talk) 11:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ACR Carpets

informative -Ropez81 (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


How can other businesses such as pimlico plumbers have a business page and we can't? Is it because Max Clifford is their PR?

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Articles about companies are included based on the notability of the topic - not based on the kind of work they do. A large plumbing company that is covered in the news media may be appropriate for inclusion, while a small family-owned company may not be. This is not a value judgment as to the quality of the work or any such thing - only a reflection of what appears to be notable based on coverage in reliable secondary sources. --B (talk) 18:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomori Berat.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in KS Tomori Berat. -Zundark (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done --B (talk) 18:05, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gucci (Modern term)

  • Gucci (Modern Term) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]. The use of the phrase "Gucci" is becoming more and more popular among the teenage crowd as each day goes by! I firmly stand my ground when i state that this page deserves to be a part of Wikipedia. It was deleted on accounts of Vandalism, but in my defense, I would never publish an article/ edit previous work for the defecation of this website. I personally owe too much to this website to ever desire to hurt it in any way. I was merely adding to its richness by creating this entry because as soon as someone hears this phrase for the first time, they are likely to "google" it, and I want our page to come up first. Thank you. -Thommanator (talk) 16:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a site for things made up in school one day. --B (talk) 18:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Three Star Club.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Three Star Club. -Zundark (talk) 18:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I have restored the smaller version of the image (per NFCC#3). --B (talk) 18:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Certified Information Systems Security Professional

The article is worth reading for any individual who is seeking a certification in computer security profile. It is common in wikipedia to provide knowledge about various certifications and organisations providing them. Who ever comments this as "this is just an advert for a certification" should concern about deleting the following topics also. 1.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Certified_Engineer#Red_Hat_Certified_Engineer_.28RHCE.29 2.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCIE#Cisco_Certified_Internetwork_Expert_.28CCIE.29 -124.124.95.15 (talk) 09:33, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Technology_Infrastructure_Library.

File:Premiere Devolopment Bank logox.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Premiere Development Bank. -Zundark (talk) 14:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 19:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request to userify

Could the following deleted page be placed in my userspace please?

Thanks Mathewignash (talk) 18:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some of them that I looked at randomly were deleted per AFD. For what purpose do you want them restored? --B (talk) 04:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
They are all AFDs. I want to work on them to try to improve them. Mathewignash (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The concerns don't seem to be quality of the articles - they seem to be that minor characters are definitely not notable. Though another admin may feel differently, my inclination is that this should go to DRV - the consensus seems to be that these are not going to be notable regardless of the level of effort you put into them. --B (talk) 13:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My plan was merge some of the less-notable characters down to their team pages, and move the plot summary to episode listings, but I wanted access to the orignals to help write. If it's to much work, I'm sorry. Whatever you can do is fine. It would just help me having to re-research the characters.Mathewignash (talk) 01:36, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This might contribute to the notability discussion. CycloneGU (talk) 02:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Listen, I wrote the majority of the content of those pages, and I don't have copies of my work. I request you make it available to me please. You can userify, or email it to me. Mathewignash (talk) 23:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Ward

Please check the deletion log. It appears that a user simply didn't like Kyle Ward's music and only because of that proposed a deletion of his wiki page. Many do not agree on that, and it's a invalid argument for deleting a page. I hereby request his wiki page to be brought back. -90.129.58.213 (talk) 21:02, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quantech ATZ

academic investigation transference successful case -Ajzurdo (talk) 21:08, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Atama (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:13, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nabil Ayad

Notability is now asserted very well please see below -Jarral 99 (talk) 21:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Athaenara

I just noticed that you have deleted the page on Dr. Nabil Ayad at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nabil_Ayad&action=edit&redlink=1 quite surprisingly for your concern that 'Notability is not asserted'. I find it hasty and reckless because Dr. Ayad is a notable and distinguished personality of worldwide recognition and repute.

If you had just googled his name you probably would not have proceeded to delete the page.

Dr. Ayad is the founder head of the Diplomatic Academy of London which is world's top school of diplomacy and the only one of its kind. DAL has taught and trained generations of diplomats for over three decades and Dr. Ayad is the founder leader of the school. He has worked with Sir Peter Marshall and written a number of books on the subject. A detailed description of his achievement and contributions is available on the website of Global Diplomacy Academy. Please follow the links below for references:

http://www.globaldiplomaticacademy.com/bio.htm

http://www.globaldiplomaticacademy.com/symposia.htm

http://www.genevagsg.com/2010/12/dr-nabil-ayad/

http://culture-multicultures.blogspot.com/2010/11/interview-with-mr-nabil-ayad.html

Currently, he is Director, London Academy of Diplomacy, University of East Anglia, London and Professor of Diplomatic Studies, Nyenrode Business University , The Netherlands: http://www.uea.ac.uk/london/lad .

I hope you can restore the page with appropriate changes/additions/citations. Once it's back on the site, I'd add further details. I'll be looking forward to your quick response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarral 99 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

That article was tagged for {{proposed deletion}} at 07:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC) by Fayenatic london (talk · contribs) with the edit summary Propose deletion as insufficiently notable and the concern Notability not asserted, see WP:ACADEMIC. Per WP:PROD seven days passed during which time, if independent reliable sources existed per Wikipedia:Notability (academics) (there had been none since December 2009), other editors might have found and added them. That did not happen, so it was deleted a week later. You are free to consider Requests for undeletion. – Athaenara ✉ 22:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:CentauriDawnCover.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Centauri Dawn. -Zundark (talk) 22:23, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done --B (talk) 01:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ji Chang-wook

Original author contacted me to ask for help after I expanded one of his other articles which is at AfD. This one also seems to have sufficient news sources in Korean to write a much better article: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Can you put it in my userspace so I can work on it until it clearly demonstrates notability? Thanks. -cab (call) 03:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, never mind, he recreated it himself at Ji Chang-wook. If there's anything useful can someone undelete the history? Cheers, cab (call) 04:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You must have looked at it for the split second it was there before I moved it to your userspace. --B (talk) 04:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:CaliforniaAliBaba/Ji Chang-wook. --B (talk) 04:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:WellsBelloc1.jpg and File:WellsBelloc2.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Mr. Belloc Objects to "The Outline of History". -Zundark (talk) 09:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Mr. Belloc Objects to "The Outline of History". -Zundark (talk) 09:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I merged these two requests. My inclination is to not restore these images because I do not see how they meet WP:NFCC#8. Are these images essential to the user's understanding of the topic? They don't seem to be mentioned in the text of the article. --B (talk) 12:49, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've never seen the images, and I don't know what the FURs say, so I'm not in much of a position to judge. If you don't think they should be restored, I'll just remove the links from the article. --Zundark (talk) 13:00, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image 1 Image 2. The contents of the image description pages are in the collapse box:
Image description pages inside
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. 
{{di-orphaned fair use|date=12 March 2011}}
{{Non-free use rationale
 |Article           = Mr. Belloc Objects to "The Outline of History"
 |Description       = Caricature of [[H. G. Wells]].
 |Source            = Derived from a digital capture (photo/scan) of the internal illustration. Copyright held by the publisher or the artist. Claimed as fair use regardless.
 |Portion           = Internal page illustration
 |Low resolution    = Yes
 |Purpose           = The image serves as the primary means of visual identification of the author (Mr. Wells). 
 |Replaceability    = There is no free equivalent of this image, so the image cannot be replaced by a free image.
 |Other information = The use of the cover will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original. In particular, copies could not be used to make illegal copies of the book.  Originally printed in the [[New Statesman]].
}}
{{di-orphaned fair use|date=12 March 2011}}
{{Non-free use rationale
 |Article           = Mr. Belloc Objects to "The Outline of History"
 |Description       = Caricature of Hilaire Belloc
 |Source            = Derived from a digital capture (photo/scan) of the internal illustration. Copyright held by the publisher or the artist. Claimed as fair use regardless.
 |Portion           = Internal page illustration
 |Low resolution    = Yes
 |Purpose           = The image serves as the primary means of visual identification of the subject (Mr. Belloc). 
 |Replaceability    = There is no free equivalent of this book cover, so the image cannot be replaced by a free image.
 |Other information = The use of this image will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original. In particular, copies could not be used to make illegal copies of the book.  Originally published in the [[New Statesman]].
}}

--B (talk) 13:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that they shouldn't be restored, and I've removed the links from the article. Thanks for handling these requests. --Zundark (talk) 13:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. --B (talk) 13:37, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done --B (talk) 13:37, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:WWF The Music Volume 3.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in WWF The Music, Vol. 3. -Zundark (talk) 09:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done --B (talk) 12:44, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buckcherry next 2 you.png

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Next 2 You (Buckcherry song). -Zundark (talk) 12:18, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done --B (talk) 12:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Harrington (ice hockey)

Please restore the edit history of this recently re-created article. -Dolovis (talk) 14:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done --B (talk) 14:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nexus_%28film%29

was listed too soon, now Comcast release was Apr 2011, upcoming North America DVD/VOD Aug 9, 2011 -76.67.11.232 (talk) 19:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nexus (film), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Wizardman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Anyway, the deleted article was all of 3 lines long, plus a listing a cast members. If you are sure that it is notable, and meets the film notability guideline, it may be easier simply to recreate it. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 20:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I went ahead and restored it, since the deletion reason no longer applies and the film is now out/about to be out. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adryan Oliveira Tavares

Adryan Oliveira Tavares is a well know professional footballer who has played for the national football team of Brazil in the 2011 Under 17 FIFA World Cup , coming fourth place and winning the bronze shoe for the 3rd most goals in the competition . The original article was deleted on grounds of Adryan Oliveira Tavaeres not being a known footballer -Romanempire295 (talk) 03:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adryan Oliveira Tavares, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user BigDom (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Skier Dude (talk) 03:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Destroy All Humans box art for the PlayStation 2.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Destroy All Humans!. -Zundark (talk) 08:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ScratchYourName.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Scratch Your Name. -Zundark (talk) 08:45, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:AcornArthur110desktopsmall.png

Should be used in History of the graphical user interface and History of RISC OS. -Trevj (talk) 11:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently originally included with this edit.

 Done Restored & FuR's added - leaving it up to the requester to put in the articles as he deems appropriate. 02:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you Now included in articles. --Trevj (talk) 06:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

William Douglas (Bill) King

required revisions regarding significance of subject to be made and references to be supplied -WmDKing (talk) 11:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Joseph's College, Geelong Logo.svg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in St Joseph's College, Geelong. -Zundark (talk) 12:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Souryam.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Souryam. -Zundark (talk) 15:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done January (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spotonised

it is not a name of a company. This name was invented by me to describe a brand new advertising trend of the 21 century that involves more than just becoming a member of any business network. I have only started to write this article and I am in the process of learning how to write the Wikipedia article properly. This term "Spotonised" has been of a great interest of many PR and media companies in the UK already and I would like to educate people about it by writing some basic formation what it means, what it does, etc. Please, can you reconsider the undulation of my only just started article and let me complete it. Kind regards, Zaneta Vaughan-Spruce -THEWITCHEZ (talk) 22:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile17

Page was not maintained but there are multiple sources referencing it that could be included, including hard publications. Suggest a restore and update? -140.247.10.201 (talk) 00:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ie. Mention in Popular Science magazine. http://books.google.com/books?id=m3ZUE6GJZekC&pg=PA78&lpg=PA78&dq=geek+blog+mobile17&source=bl&ots=CZMVzHVAWn&sig=Jg4E_-D_HDm9OdQDqI92AhrUcRk&hl=en&ei=4eAcTqHNNaL00gG-tLG4Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCYQ6AEwAg

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile17, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Skier Dude (talk) 02:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Eskola

I'm not sure why this doesn't meet the standards of being "noteworthy" Chris Eskola is an active bassist who has worked with, most notably, Mike Keneally and Chris Opperman on the album Oppy Music, Vol. I: Purple, Crayon, and Brian Viglione on the album Face of the Sun. -Pivotbass (talk) 01:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Ritchie

Uncontested PROD; I came looking to see if an article was written about this player, drafted by the Dallas Stars, but find it deleted and the deleting admin. referring me here when I objected within the last hour. Want to see the existing article and see if I can determine the concerns and address them, as I am quite familiar with Ritchie's OHL team: the Sarnia Sting. -CycloneGU (talk) 02:17, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kirk M Kelly

The Reason I wish to have this page undeleted is that if you look here http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2329292/ it shows that Kirk is in fact an actor for film and tv. -Kktalent (talk) 03:12, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Varuninds

Please restore my last page

The article is a basic information and achievement of the person and the intention is not for advertisement any how... I will make the requirement changes as per the guidelines and help from wikipedia.

Thank you -Varuninds (talk) 05:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done There's a whole whack of issues here. First, conflict of interest - you cannot write an article about your organization or people within your organization. Second, this business itself does not appear to meet notability requirements, and the person in charge of it certainly does not, and was therefore highly WP:PROMO. There's more...however, even though you wrote this on your userpage, it still must meet certain limits to remain. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Hart_%28artist%29

Expired PROD, concern was: Non notable writer with no independent sources to prove notability. -74.113.216.69 (talk) 07:13, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:AcornComunicator.jpg

Source to be confirmed if/when restored. If source impossible to ascertain, image will be replaced with a new upload from one of the links below. Source can be requested from uploader User:TreveX. A free image will be difficult to obtain because this is now a rare piece of hardware. FUR difficult to compose without seeing image - this will be done. -Trevj (talk) 08:22, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source is likely to be [1] or [2].

Not done. I'm sympathetic, but even if restored this will end up being deleted on NFCC grounds. This image is simply a picture of the computer and part of the cord sitting on what looks to be a dark brown faux wood grain table. I'd suggest contacting the owner of the first website you linked to and see if he's willing to release his pictures under an acceptable free license. Feel free to follow up on my talk page. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:How do you like Wednesday 2.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in How do you like Wednesday?. -Zundark (talk) 11:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Midhurst & Easebourne F.C.

This club have for many years played at Step 6 in the National League System in England - which my majority consensus for English Football clubs makes them notable and worthy of an article - and before its deletion, had been an article for many years. Its deletion makes Midhurst & Easebourne F.C. one of only 4 clubs who play at Step 6 and above in England, not to have their own article. Two others are new to Step 6 this season and the fourth is Rustington F.C. whose article has also been deleted and I'll be appealing that one too. -Madmax2011 (talk) 12:58, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is fundamentally wrong to be putting forward for deletion any Step 6 side in the National League System in England as they are clearly notable. In many ways the deletion of this page is an act of vandalism and should be restored forthwith to ensure compatibility with other Step 6 clubs. (Finnish Gas 13:15, 13 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. Please review the original sourcing concerns, or the article may be nominated for deletion at WP:AFD. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rustington F.C.

Play at Step 6 - as per reason above for Midhurst & Easebourne F.C. -Madmax2011 (talk) 13:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is fundamentally wrong to be putting forward for deletion any Step 6 side in the National League System in England as they are clearly notable. In many ways the deletion of this page is an act of vandalism and should be restored forthwith to ensure compatibility with other Step 6 clubs. (Finnish Gas 13:15, 13 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. Please review the original sourcing concerns, or the article may be nominated for deletion at WP:AFD. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Riftforge

no consensus -Krasimir (talk) 13:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Note: Wyatt Riot says the reason for deleting it was that the game was not reviewed by third parties. One reason is that it is still in beta.

More importantly, all web games suffer from a mainstream media bias. For example, Rune Scape which has a similar userbase to World of Warcraft still hasn't received a review from [GameSpot] after 10 years of operation. Wikipedia is an ONLINE encyclopedia, so it makes sense for it to provide info on topics which print encyclopedias don't.

Lastly, Wyatt is over-eager to suggest games for deletion as his talk page indicates.

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riftforge, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
also note that for games, as for any article subject, it is necessary to show notability by means of references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources; if the game is still in beta, this may not be possible, which means it is not yet ready for an article; and please read WP:NPA and WP:AGF. JohnCD (talk) 16:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NACHO Athletic Club

This is a running association founded 4 years ago in the Boston area that share the principals of the Hash House Harriers, which also have a wikipedia page. This is not for promotion of said club, but since they have been referenced in the Boston Globe, Boston Herald and in media news outlets for their participation in the Boston Marathon and other running activities, I thought it was notable to give them a wikipedia page. -Linzylinz (talk) 16:45, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Ponyo (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Please also see Wikipedia's guideline for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, there need to be multiple non-trivial reliable sources discussing your company for it to be included. --B (talk) 17:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aerodef, LLC

I am trying to create a page for my business, so people can see more information about it. I am not using it as advertising, but it would be great to have it connected to the Facebook profile of the business. I did not put any phone numbers or websites in there. Please do not delete it. People are interested in learning about the biz and this would be a great way to have them learn. I see many businesses on here, and I do not see why this would be deleted if it is just general info about the business. -Aerodef4 (talk) 06:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Acroterion (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:11, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wwfwcwecwinvasion.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in WWF Invasion. -Zundark (talk) 16:21, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 21:46, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Soldiers of Allah

reasoning -114.79.18.48 (talk) 21:27, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soldiers of Allah, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 21:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IPE Global

Even after providing verifiable references the page has been deleted. -Preethi31 (talk) 07:39, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Serge Ibaka glides in for a thunderous dunk while snagging a teddy bear during the Sprite Slam Dunk Contest

WARNING: you did not submit your request correctly!

You need to replace the "PageName" parameter of the template with the name of the page that you would like restored, spelled correctly, with proper case. Please click the "[edit]" link to the right, and replace the contents of this section with:

{{subst:refund|The name of the requested page|your reasoning for asking to undelete it}}

reasoning -Majdi achour (talk) 10:57, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=439601280"