Talk:Tropical Storm Delta (2005)

Merge

Approve of article I support this article, it should stay seperate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weatherman90 (talk • contribs)

Keep This storm article should not be merged --24.83.100.214 03:53, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed; it did do a lot of damage to the Canaries where storms are not expected to... CrazyC83 20:18, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very Big Keep Delta did better than Epsilon,who doesnt deserve an article. Epsilon made no landfall,Delta did.— Preceding unsigned comment added by HurricaneCraze32 (talk • contribs)

Keep This deserves an article. Epsilon and Zeta deserves one if Vince gets one, but are they really noteworthy other than surviving four hundred predictions of weakening and the latter surviving a year change? I survived the year change and I didn't get an article.... Bsd987 22:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Todo

It has too much of a current-event/work-in-progress feel. Bad grammar in the intro is really bad. And hey, it is a work-in-progress since the TCR hasn't been released. Jdorje 05:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. It is hard to write top-quality articles without the TCR...plus we need to use the information we have (although it is fairly decent in this case) CrazyC83 05:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TCR is out

same in puessure and wind although they said it may of become a hurricane just not info to prove it Jrc028

better pic

The TCR report of Delta has a very nice picture of Delta. Maybe we can use that one, too.Icelandic Hurricane 02:31, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the current one looks like a dying hurricane. 24.85.161.198 19:45, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]