Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Irene (2005)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.85.161.198 (talk) at 06:34, 13 February 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Hurricane

Todo

No real information here outside of the storm history. Could some more (different-looking) pics be found? Jdorje 04:15, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

What do you think? I think it should be merged because it did nothing but a fishspinner. --24.85.161.198 23:40, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So did Maria... well sort of.Icelandic Hurricane 01:41, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maria killed 1 person... Irene, did nothing. --24.85.161.198 03:19, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Irene was a big nothing. A Category 2 hurricane is not notable for being a Category 2 hurricane. I would support separate articles for each storm instead of one separate article for all of the storms, but it seems that the opposite was the consensus on the 2005 page. —Cuiviénen (Cuivië) 03:49, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Right, Irene isn't notable, I think we shouldn't be discussing this anymore, Irene was only a fishspinner. It should be Merged. Memicho 01:55, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I say merge. It did next to nothing. Mind you, a case could be made to keep. Maria is as notable as Irene, fishspinners. Maria made landfall as extratropical.WotGoPlunk 03:33, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maria at least did some damage. 24.85.161.198 01:33, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since when there has been articles for fishspinners that did nothing and only reached category 1 or 2? Never, why are we still discussing this? I say it should be merged. Memicho 02:45, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, nobody's objected to the merge. But whoever does it, make sure you merge the whole thing. We could even add full infoboxes to the storms list page... — jdorje (talk) 03:33, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you jdorje. Memicho 05:15, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On notability, merge back. However, the page is long enough and detailed enough to warrant keeping. As a result, I vote to keep, simply on its length. CrazyC83 21:55, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still in favor of having one article per storm, rather than the List of 2005 Atlantic hurricane season storms article. However if we don't have an article for every storm, I don't think Irene is particlarly worthy on its own. — jdorje (talk) 22:21, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I say we keep it, and let people add info.--Weatherman90 04:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Keep Good kitty 02:57, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Merge, as it's a fishspinner. It did no damage whatsoever.WotGoPlunk 16:01, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep is the point of wikipedia not to have as much info as possible? Jamie|C 16:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Maybe there will be enough information when the TCR is completed, but it wasn't a very important storm to keep its article separated. juan andrés 18:15, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Irene report is already out.

Merge, right now my vote is to merge Irene's article, but if someone can find some interesting information, I think we could keep it. Memicho 18:28, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]