Jump to content

Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Illustration workshop

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ganeshrg (talk | contribs) at 18:13, 17 November 2008 (Fiat Palio Multijet Diesel photo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

 Illustration workshop
 
 Photography workshop
 
 Map workshop
 
 
Skip to:
Logo for Project:Graphics LabGraphics Lab/Illustration workshop

This page is deprecated and will not be monitored. Please use one of the three workshop pages. This specific page is {{{1}}}


Archive
Completed requests from the former workshops (Images to improve & Image workshop) were archived regularly:






A simple equation

Articels: Equals sign

Request: SVGify this equation, so that it can be displayed as part of a {{double image stack}} alongside the original (hard to read by modern eyes) equation. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 22:30, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppinion: How's this? Debate 09:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The second looks a little internally strange. EG. Is the "x" in a different fontface? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 00:27, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I freely admit that I'm no expert in mathematical symbology, but that's the way the x is displayed when written as an equation in Word, as well as how it's displayed in the mathematical mark-up you used above (ie : <math>14\sqrt{x}+|15|=|71|\,\!</math>), so I presume that the typeface of the x is mathematically significant. Nonetheless, the type-face can be easily changed if required. Debate 02:59, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For this it doesn't have to be perfect. I strongly suspect that a featured image could be found of some part of this, but will let others decide... 68.39.174.238 (talk) 23:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Variable names such as x are typically rendered in an italic font in order to distinguish them from constants--so the font change is correct. However, the equation still looks strange. To make it more legible, the operators, + and =, should be surrounded with spaces. Rangergordon (talk) 10:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A few graphs on the housing bubble

Articles: Subprime mortgage crisis and related articels.

Request: For all of them, SVGify if possible, since they are perfect for it (Boxes, colors and text). For the graphs, they should be recreated with (if possible) a standard look, but definitely free of unneeded dimensions (EG. Spurious 3D effects or shading). 68.39.174.238 (talk) 20:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Who vectorized these and didn't tell me? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 22:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Answer:Checking who uploaded them would be a good start, although the line graph doesn't look that accurate?. §hep¡Talk to me! 23:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A question for some other people: Do you think having the exact #s at the head of the bars is an improvement or not? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 22:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If I can get the data used for these graphs then I can draw them all with gnuplot. -- Borb (talk) 14:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion:The last table simply as wikitable:

Earnings Remain Well Below Year-Earlier Levels
year $ Billions
-4 0 4 8 12 18 20 24 28 32 36 40
2004
1
31.8
2
33.2
3
34.7
4
32.6
2005
1
34.0
2
33.2
3
34.7
4
32.6
2006
1
36.9
2
38.0
3
38.1
4
36.3
2007
1
36.6
2
38.8
3
28.8
4
0.6
2008
1
19.3
  Net operating income, securities and other gains/losses
--Demoeconomist (talk) 16:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the SVG of the cause/effect diagram, under "Response", the one box has "Hope New Alliance", which should be "Hope Now". Thanx, 68.39.174.238 (talk) 18:40, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed! --Slashme (talk) 10:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Any idea why it gets so ugly at thumbnail size? I don't know that it would affect its use in articels, but I'm curious. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 21:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed it. Text sometimes does not render very well in SVG images, so having it thumbnail size only makes it worse. I converted all of the text into paths, so it should look good now. --pbroks13talk? 06:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanx. Can you change "programe" to "program" ? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 23:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Oeste region

Article(s): pt:Região de Turismo do Oeste, ...

Request: It's this map : http://europedirect.draplvt.min-agricultura.pt/imagens/mapa_regiao_oeste.png

Please, it's aslo a this map, not Portugal Cancelos (talk) 12:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:I was looking for a different map, and it would help to know where the map is located. Portugal from the looks of it? Also, what article would this go into? Thanks! §hep¡Talk to me! 21:12, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LocalNUTS3Oeste.svg describes where in portugal it is. Image:Mapa de Portugal.svg can be used to get the subdivisions. /Lokal_Profil 16:57, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


BBFC U Cert

Article(s): BBFC

Request: There is a lot of noise around the edge of this image. Please could someone remove this noise. Thanks Mangwanani (talk) 18:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

Not sure I see what you mean. /Lokal_Profil 20:01, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Look around the outside edge of the black triangle. There is a lot of white noise in this area. While this may not be wholly visible in the chequered area it is noticeable on a black background. Mangwanani (talk) 15:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I also can't see any noise. Are we missing something? --Slashme (talk) 10:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can't see it on the checkered background but copy it into Word or something and give the transparency a black background and there is a white haze around the triangle which can't be missed... There was also the same problem with the 15 Certificate but I put that in the lab and that was fixed. Mangwanani (talk) 10:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's the best I could get it, but I only have MS Paint to work with. Someone with PS should be able to do this better with less hassle. Hope that helps. §hep¡Talk to me! 06:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just cleaned up the U one completely. I uploaded it back over the original. I'll do the 12 when I get a moment. Mfield (talk) 06:53, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I knocked out the 12 and uploaded it over the original. --pbroks13talk? 09:16, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cordoba flag

Article(s): Córdoba, Spain

Request: Can you SVGize the flag. Shouldn't be too difficult since the hardest parts are already done in the coat of arms. gren グレン 01:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Done. I'm waiting for a copyright issue with the arms (actually the city logo) to be resolved over at Commons—I'll upload as soon as it's clear. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and sorry I didn't see that there was a copyright issue when I requested this (and I didn't sign my name). gren グレン 10:59, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it appears they have been deleted. Will you upload it... or at least the original with a fair use claim? I did not make a copy. gren グレン 11:00, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd upload it as fair use, but what about Image:Flag of Córdoba, Spain.svg? Fvasconcellos* (t·c) 18:49, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's possible that the iamge is a free interpretation of the flag/seal. Hard to say without comparing to the original. /Lokal_Profil 02:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Herzegovina

Article(s): History of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Duchy of Herzegovina

Request: Bosna Krallığı is Bosnian Kingdom, Hersek Dükalığı is Duchy of Herzegovina, Sırp Despotluğu is Serbian Despotate, Macaristan is Kingdom of Hungary, Venedikliler ise Republic of Venice, Karadağ is Montenegro, Osmanlı Devleti is Ottoman Empire, Eflak is Wallachia, Adriyatik Denizi is Adriatic Sea. SVG ification, and upload Commons, please.Lord Leatherface (talk) 16:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: I'll try it. James1293 (talk) 00:46, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, someone else can do it. I need to work on my speed-svg skills... I think i might be tracing too meticulously. James1293 (talk) 01:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tried it more... It's pretty difficult. Does it really need svg? James1293 (talk) 19:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Stale tag removed. §hep¡Talk to me! 22:15, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Portugal

Article(s): : pt:Portugal

Request: Hello, I would need to have this plan in SVG and another colors if possible, thank you Cancelos (talk) 20:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

Have you looked in commons:Category:SVG maps of Portugal. /Lokal_Profil 20:15, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't like others Cancelos (talk) 18:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What colors would you suggest, can you give us what the words say (diacritics and such), and what don't you like about the existing maps? That way we know not the replicate the problems. Thanks! §hep¡Talk to me! 21:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's Portugal's beige and SVG. Cancelos (talk) 13:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not going to try this one but for whoever is I recommend using Image:Mapa de Portugal.svg as a base. It's a complex map but it's easy to remove say municipal and national borders if only county borders are to be kept. /Lokal_Profil 16:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No because ; Portugal's article is voting for good article. This map is good, it's a jpg (SVG à faire !), Cancelos (talk) 07:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry? In which way is the JPG map better then the SVG map? Apart from city names and positions and the (probably disproportionally big) size of Madeira ant the Azores I don't see a difference. /Lokal_Profil 16:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maas Brothers store

Article(s): Maas Brothers

Request: Can we remove that large object above the building in the upper left of the photo? It looks like an arm for a traffic light or something, but it's not really crucial to the image, and is rather distracting. And for the same reason, is it possible to remove the lady from the bottom of the photo? SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:55, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:Hi, I did retouch the image (removed the traffic light and the lady) but it seems the image have no source information and it is uploaded only in en wikipedia. Please complete source information and verify the copyright status of this images, then I can upload the retouched image to the Commons.   ■ MMXXtalk  10:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. I can remove the object and the lady, only if you add source info. --Jackl 08:43, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, what you see on the image description page is all I have to go by. I have messaged the user, but have unfortunately received no reply. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:54, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


White Americans

Article(s): White Americans

Request: wikify map, standard colors... Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 01:25, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, one note: Canada's Maritime Provinces aren't yellow, while the rest of the country is; I'm assuming that the entire country should be the same colo(u)r. Nyttend (talk) 00:24, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: I might try to figure out Inkscape while recreating the map based on commons:Image:BlankMap-World6.svg Tadpole9(talk • contribs) 03:46, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just found GunnMap, might use that instead. Anyone know the source of the data used in the existing image? Tadpole9(talk • contribs) 05:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Coat of Arms of Indonesia

Article(s): Coat of Arms of Indonesia

Request: Please correct the national motto held by the bird. It should read "BHINNEKA TUNGGAL IKA" instead of "INKA".Please check with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhinneka_Tunggal_Ika, which shows the correct spelling. 202.13.5.157 (talk) 10:28, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

Probably easiest for Sagredo to do since he might still have a version with the text as text rather then paths. /Lokal_Profil 16:54, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done it, but I've changed the font used. --F l a n k e r (talk) 18:10, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flatten paper

Resolved

Articels: Marriage a-la-mode: 1. The Marriage Settlement

Request: Is it possible to "flatten" the paper out, correct the washed out parts and crop the black so it's possibly legible? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 22:15, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppinion: I can crop the image and adjust for the color/brightness... but I can't remove the bend of the paper. I'll give it a try when I get home. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 02:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good improvements, but the upper right hand is still very dark. Can anything be done about it? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 18:37, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion 2: How about this (-edit1). I cropped your original, did some noise reduction, adjusted levels and removed the browning and sharpened to enhance readability. Mfield (talk) 06:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Better, but the upper right corner is still noticeably darker. Is there anything that can be done the, or is that as good as it gets? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 08:24, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll have another look when I get the chance but it's been pushed a long way already, there may be not much more data left to push without artifacting. Mfield (talk) 18:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll accept this as done. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 18:05, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Map of SkyTrain (section 2)

Article(s): SkyTrain (Vancouver)

Request: There is something wrong with the image. The Millennium Line stations, Sapperton and Braid, are switched, so I need it to be switched back to their original positions. Thanks. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 20:09, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: done. Mfield (talk) 06:04, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O ****. It was good. Actually, revert it. I'm so stupid... -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 06:49, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You sure? Other people think its the other way round too. Mfield (talk) 06:59, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, revert it. I'm sure. [1] -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 07:19, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think you need to force a reload. The link you just gave me shows Braid above Sapperton, same as the one I gave you and same as what I edited the file to be and then uploaded it over the old.?! Mfield (talk) 07:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]



Create Image:Hangul writing scheme.svg (SVG easy to do)

Article(s): Hangul

Request: Hello ! The Korean writing system have special rules of letter combinaisons, display on this this external image. It would be interesting to create an SVG image to showing the similar example. You can get the korean characters on Hangul or on the Korean wikipedia. Yug (talk) 21:39, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Am I right in assuming that the idea is to better illustrate the Jamo placement within a block section? --Wiml (talk) 19:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:
I encourage new graphists to manage this request, that can be an good start to practice with Inkscape. ;) Yug (talk) 21:39, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Coat of arms

Resolved

Article(s): Pi Kappa Phi

Request: Can someone convert this image to SVG. Thanks. — ŁittleÄlien¹8² (talk\contribs) 20:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: I made one. The original says that it was made in 1909, so I tagged the new one with {{PD-old}} from the commons, making it no longer fair-use. --pbroks13talk? 18:37, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't that make the original one PD-US too? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 21:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've marked the JPG as such. §hep¡Talk to me! 23:30, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that looks great! Thank you so much for making this image. — ŁittleÄlien¹8² (talk\contribs) 00:12, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The first version of the Coat of Arms was designed in 1909, "The current coat of arms is much different from the original." is what it says on Pi_Kappa_Phi#Coat_of_arms. Thus both the svg and the jpg are fair-use only. /Lokal_Profil 01:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The final version (with all of the current modifications) was completed by 1909. The original version, that the passage is referring to, was created soon after the fraternity was founded in 1904. — ŁittleÄlien¹8² (talk\contribs) 01:55, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The section in the Pi Kappa Phi article is incorrect. If you look at the cited reference, it indicates that the changes that took place "in the early years," happened before 1909. — ŁittleÄlien¹8² (talk\contribs) 01:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Technically it could still be a problem since the way the Coat of Arms was depicted might have changed although it contents have remained the same, ideally a scanned in version from 1909ish should be used to get around this problem. But I won't press on that. /Lokal_Profil 12:47, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. Looking at this image, this coat doesn't seemed to have changed much in the last 90 years... any thoughts? --pbroks13talk? 06:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly the design of the lamp might be under a new copyright, but then the image doesn't include the book either so if that was added in say 1911 the lamp might have changed to it's current shape at the same time. Wouldn't worry unless someone writes and complains though. /Lokal_Profil 16:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Romeo and Juliet

Article(s): Romeo and Juliet

Request: At the Romeo and Juliet featured article candidature I commented that many of the images needed nice crops, cleaning. I have listed above the ones I thought were most obvious that someone could help with but feel free to look at the article if you think you can help with others. My 'comments' are vague because I am not good at this... but all of the images I paste I think could be cleaned up somewhat to make this a better FAC.

It may be a good idea to upload as different, restored images and then comment on the FAC or change them yourselves rather than overwriting these images. gren グレン 12:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: I uploaded a new version of the portrait of John Gielgud. The author requested that his work integrity should not be touched. I hope that the black border was not part of the work. What do you think? --pabouk (talk) 11:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Charlotte Cushman Susan Cushman also done.   ■ MMXXtalk  16:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I straightened out Image:Arthur Brooke Tragicall His.jpg somewhat, feel free to revert if you want the old version back. Tadpole9(talk • contribs) 20:08, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also retouched the second image, but didn't replace the original this time. Tadpole9(talk • contribs) 22:06, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Demographics of Iraq

Article(s): Demographics of Iraq, and others

Request: SVG ification, and upload Commons new version, please.--Lord Leatherface (talk) 14:50, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: It's probably earier just to click the "create a new section" link if you need a template. I hope the header wasn't supposed to say Romeo and Juliet. §hep¡Talk to me! 20:43, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This jpg version doesn't have any sourcing to prove that it meets WP:RS so it couldn't really be used for an FA. I recommend using as our base a map sourced from a reliable place so the SVG will be well sourced as well. gren グレン 12:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Scout Guide, Image:RussianScoutGuide.jpg

Resolved

Article(s):

Request: umm, just basically cleanup-background, perspective, depth of coloration... Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 15:29, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

That does not appear to be a free image (scan of a book cover, etc) and there is no fair-use rational. Can you fix the licensing first? ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 07:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. 118.13.94.131 (talk) 17:45, November 8, 2008 (UTC)
I uploaded a new version of image, how is it?   ■ MMXXtalk  09:04, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's nice, thank you! Can you trim off excess bordering (still black spots on left side), and is it possible to even out the coloration? Thank you! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 13:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded three other version over same file (See file history), please compare them and tell me which one is better, then (if needed) I will upload the final version agein.   ■ MMXXtalk  09:23, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I just would like to point out that the quality of the already poor original image is severely degraded in the latest edit from 10:19, 11 November 2008[2] (very visible JPEG or sharpening artifacts, lost details). I think that the best version is the first edit from 20:25, 13 December 2006 first edit from 10:01, 9 November 2008 although it is oversharpened. --pabouk (talk) 09:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am confused by your comment, about sharpening the final version wich labled (Edit 4) and first edit wich labled (Retouched - 09:01, November 9, 2008) and the original image (19:25, December 13, 2006) are nearly same, I did only sharpened the image just in (Edit 3 - 09:18, November 11, 2008) and (Edit 2 - 09:16, November 11, 2008). I think you have problem with viweing images try emptying your browser's cache or refresh page by (Ctrl+F5). and also I don't know why the numbers that you wrote in your comment are different by the hours in the file history.   ■ MMXXtalk  05:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I originally included wrong date for the first edit (now I repaired it). The hours are probably different because I am in a different time zone and the time is displayed as local time (not UTC). I certainly do not have problem with cached images. The first edit labelled "Retouched" is a little bit aggressively sharpened. Maybe your software sharpens images without letting you know. May I know what do you use? I would say that there is no need to sharpen the original image or it could be sharpened just very lightly. Please compare the original image and the last edit "Edit 4" (probably made from the first edit). You will see that there are ugly artifacts on the sharp edges - easily visible on the line under the label in the centre.
The edits 2 and 3 are not only sharpened but also converted to monochrome / two-levels (light and dark). I am certainly not a fan of such heavy modifications. It is not a restoration of the original. --pabouk (talk) 10:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I did upload another version without any sharpening, but the problem is stretching the image make it more blurred than original image so I thought a little sharpening would be fine and also a little sharpening make the image more clear, anyway you can compare edits and decide which one is better. by the way I use Adobe Photoshop.   ■ MMXXtalk  08:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. You are right that the stretched image is slightly blurred and a little bit of sharpening will probably help. Maybe the stretching tool in Photoshop allows selection of interpolation algorithm. Lanczos with higher parameter than 3 will produce sharper output. Personally I would say that Edit 5 is much better than Edit 4. But I am not one who is interested in this particular image. I am just a passer-by :) --pabouk (talk) 11:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is great, thank you so much! Marking
Resolved
Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 18:14, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Income tax

Article(s): Income tax

Request: This image renders correctly in firefox's svg render and did render well in the wikipedia one, but it seems to have broken. What can I do to correct this? GameKeeper (talk) 14:45, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: This should probably go to Wikipedia:Village pump (technical), I don't remember the software Wikimedia uses, (something Wizard?) but if it worked before and not now it's most likely a software issue. §hep¡Talk to me! 17:31, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should be fixed now. --pbroks13talk? 20:28, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately you did not say what did you change. Did you convert the text to image? --pabouk (talk) 22:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hah, sorry. Yeah, I converted the all of the text to paths. --pbroks13talk? 02:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ImageMagick ? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 00:56, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are you asking me what I used? If you are, I used Inkscape. --pbroks13talk? 00:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A question: What's with the astericks and shouldn't it be "Slovakia" ? 68.39.174.238 (talk) 00:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Coat of arms of Palau

Article(s): Palau, politics template so dozens of articles

Request: color to match Image:Execseal.png-- Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 00:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: There isn't a .gif but a PNG does exist, did you mean that one? §hep¡Talk to me! 01:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 01:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Plese not that the first image has license problems. /Lokal_Profil 02:10, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed both, I think. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 11:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is image straight?

Article(s): Quadripoint

Request: I tried to straighten the image from its right-tilted original but I am not convinced that it is entirely straight yet. But it may just be the curve of my monitor distracing me. Can someone with better image software chek it? Rmhermen (talk) 18:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: It was off a tad. But it depends what you wanted to look straight, for instance I used the cross as my vert and horiz measures. Out of curiosity what software did you use? If you feel my edit detracts from the image please revert it! §hep¡Talk to me! 18:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The thumbnail isn't updating... Seen this on a few other images but I don't know the cause. :( -----J.S (T/C/WRE) 22:08, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Iz becuz zhe wiki needs to get sum new image rendering software. (That was fun) §hep¡Talk to me! 22:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Three-point field goal diagram(s)

Article(s): Three-point field goal

Request: This article needs, at the very least, a pictorial representation of the NBA three-point line as described in the "Rule specifications" section (including the "closest point" also described in the section) Furthermore, perhaps a comparison of three-point line distances would be nice. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 09:00, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: To whoever does this I found an SVG that might be helpful at Basketball. §hep¡Talk to me! 17:08, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This one maybe too, there are some others here and here. §hep¡Talk to me! 17:20, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Too whomever takes this up, it might be helpful to the reader if the colors matched approximately what might be expected to be seen at an actual basketball court. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 19:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Efron and other dice

Article(s): Nontransitive dice

Request: Quick vectorizations, not even sure if it's worth the time =) ... I'd do it, but I'm a bit busy. I'll probably just do it later this week if no one else gets to it. James1293 (talk) 18:28, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Vectorized "transitive dice" -- GateKeeperX (talk) 10:39, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vectorized "Efron dice", (is the last cube not supposed to have a number on top?) -- GateKeeperX (talk) 11:16, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

french translation needed

Article(s): Cooking

Request: Please provide an English Version! 118.90.131.160 (talk) 22:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Do these translations look right? §hep¡Talk to me! 22:26, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Translations:

  • CRU = ???
  • Grillé = Grilled
  • Bouilli = Boiled
  • POURRI = MAY
  • Fermenté = Fermented
  • Vapeur = Steam
  • CUIT = COOKED
  • Fumé = Smoked
  • Rôti = Roast
How's that? §hep¡Talk to me! 22:44, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • CRU = Raw
  • Grillé = Grilled
  • Bouilli = Boiled
  • POURRI = Rotten
  • Fermenté = Fermented
  • Vapeur = Steamed
  • CUIT = COOKED
  • Fumé = Smoked
  • Rôti = Roasted
I think this is better. Jackaranga (talk) 22:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've fixed the translations, I think. Tadpole9(talk • contribs) 01:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the second pair of eyes Jackaranga. §hep¡Talk to me! 02:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

National Emblem of the People's Republic of China

Article(s): Various

Request: The current image isn't matching to current laws of China. The legal image of the state emblem is located at http://www.safp.gov.mo/external/chin/apm/files/info/64/china_logo.gif Can the image above be changed to match the image I am linking here? User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 01:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion:

Generic Scout badge (our own image, please feel free)

Article(s): Scout request templates

Request: SVGify... Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 17:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Can the previously requested scout logo be used straight off once the colours are changed? /Lokal_Profil 00:41, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, this one is meant to be grey like the {{reqphoto}} template. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 00:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think Lokal meant something like the above. Using the SVG that had already been created. §hep¡Talk to me! 07:10, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's what I meant. Seems ti have been done though =) /Lokal_Profil 13:33, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I understand now. No, this one is meant to have distinctly different dimensions, thank you though! :) Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 15:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just clarifying. §hep¡Talk to me! 21:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fiat Palio Multijet Diesel photo

Article(s): Fiat Palio

Request: Can someone please generally improve the image? There is a bit of glare on the hood and the windscreen and the sunshine is a bit too bright. Ganeshrg (talk) 07:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Attempted. --Kamangir1214 (talk) 05:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not resample the image to a lower resolution (in addition with so bad antialiasing - see the "stairs" on the lower edge of the left window). --pabouk (talk) 16:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jeff in thailand.jpg

Article(s): Happiness

Request: Jeff Woloson was a Wikipedian who died in August 2008. His family remembers how much Wikipedia meant to him and stated so in the Memoriam dedicated to Jeff. Image:Jeff in thailand is his mother's favorite photo of Jeff. I tried to improve the photo at Image:Jeff in thailand 2 by cropping it and erasing the guy blowing his nose. However, it needs the hands of someone with more skill and better tools. Please improve "Image:Jeff in thailand" and place any improvement at "Image:Jeff in thailand 2.PNG". Perhaps crop better and erase that guy walking in the background. make the colors more vibrant, the image more clear, etc. Coming from Wikipedia, this improvement to his mother's favorite photo would really mean a lot to Jeff's family. Thanks. -- Suntag 20:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: I attempted to clean up some jpg artifacts around the woman behind Jeff and raised the quality a moderate amount, along with removing the man you requested. I added my attempt to the gallery. --Kamangir1214 (talk) 04:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Darya Saltykova

Resolved

Article(s): Darya Saltykova

Request: Trim away background... Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 03:14, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Background removed. --GateKeeperX (talk) 06:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't sure if you wanted a transparent background (gif/png) or just a white background. -- GateKeeperX (talk) 07:01, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The png is best, thank you! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 18:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, can you trim the pin off the top, rotate slightly upright, and trim down the transparent background to the outer edges of the frame? Thanks Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 18:18, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
top trimmed, cropped further, and aligned. Anything else? -- GateKeeperX (talk) 06:19, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Überbueno, you rock! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 14:49, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Earth images

Test

Article(s): Earth mostly, but each image is used several times.

Request: Is there any chance someone could SVGify these ones? Cheers, Ben (talk) 01:08, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: svged, the image in the middle, the Dipole field. -- GateKeeperX (talk) 06:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

svg'ed, the world map image, please check to make sure I didn't miss anything. -- GateKeeperX (talk) 09:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing missed on the world map, but a few nit picks if that is allowed :) Can ..
  • cT patch on Australia and Africa be moved to the left a bit;
  • mE patch that is just east of S. America be moved to the left a bit;
  • mT patch that is just east of S. America be enlarged a bit?
Also, is it possible to get the edges a little fuzzy to give the impression these regions are approximate? Thanks for all your help, Ben (talk) 10:09, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]





Drawings in Nassak Diamond

Article(s): Nassak Diamond

Request: Clean up' perhaps trace the lines, make them straighter where appropriate, etc. -- Suntag 04:53, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Vectorized 2nd Image, Image:NassakDiamondPlate1904.svg -- GateKeeperX (talk) 07:15, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vectorized 1st Image -- GateKeeperX (talk) 07:44, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. If needed, there is more info at museumdiamonds.com. -- Suntag 16:19, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In the first image (the black and white), are you having any trouble seeing the white lines against the black backdrop? I can increase the line thickness to contrast more sharply if necessary. -- GateKeeperX (talk) 16:48, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It looks fine in Nassak Diamond. However, I think the thicker lines in the original drawing represented those lines closer to the viewer and the skinner lines are the ones you would see through the diamond (that appear on the hidden side). Can you mimic the different line thickness of the original drawing NassakDiamond1876 (make the forward lines thicker). Thanks. -- Suntag 20:26, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wings of a dragonfly

Article(s):

Request: I would like someone to improve these pictures so that I can submit them to the already well endorsed Dragonfly article. I guess the images need a bit of sharpening and slight colour corrections. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Graphist opinion:

Nassak Diamond copy.jpg

Article(s): Nassak Diamond

Request: Make it less grainy, improve, etc. -- Suntag 16:54, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: Am I allowed to reduce the size by 20-25% to improve the quality, because that will help? Anyway, edited.--Kamangir1214 (talk) 04:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Flag of the Kingdom of León

Article(s): Kingdom of Asturias, Kingdom of León, Kingdom of Castile, Battle of Uclés (1108), Crown of Castile.

Request: SVG please. You can get the lion from this COA: Also the white needs to be transparent. --SelfQ (talk) 18:14, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: I used the lion and background from the COA to create the SVG banner. I don't know how closely the background shape should match, so I didn't work with it very much. Tadpole9(talk • contribs) 00:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of the Umayyad Caliphate

Article(s): Battle of Tours, Umayyad Caliphate, Abbasid Caliphate, Flag of Lebanon, Barghawata, Rashidun Caliphate, Visigothic Kingdom, Template:Country data Umayyad Caliphate.

Request: SVG please. --SelfQ (talk) 18:14, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphist opinion: I can't see that image at all, somehow. Tadpole9(talk • contribs) 00:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Their flag was sheer white. Added. --Kamangir1214 (talk) 01:50, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]