He received a final warning for the nazi edit to my talk page and made no edits since them. If he continues to vandalize after that, please report to WP:AIV, I'm no admin and therefore can't block anybody. --Oxymoron8319:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC).[reply]
A quick note
Hello, I'm thebestkiano. You have probably come across me in your anti-vandalism work (I have many times!). This is a quick note to let you know that I am leaving Wikipedia due to being treated like sh*t my Admins. For details, see my talk page. Thanks for your help on Wikipedia, goodbye. ThebestkianoT|C22:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
About half a month ago, a user from IP 195.195.14.1 vandalised Huddersfield Town F.C.. I am a member of staff at Greenhead College and their account has now been blocked on our system. If you notice any further vandalism from this IP address, please don't hesitate to contact me and I'll see that their account is disabled. Regards ~~ [Jam][talk]16:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's true, variety is good. I'm just waiting for the day when someone blames their pet (real or imaginary) on their own vandalism edits and then finally I'll be able to say "Yes it must have been your unicorn that redirected the apple page to Weird Al and replaced all the images with smily faces". :D AngelOfSadness talk 18:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In all fairness for that excuse, my cat did walk across the keyboard once while I was editing an article. I removed the asinine additions she created before I saved. But what if she had done it while I was getting a drink and I failed to notice it until it was already saved?! :P KnowledgeOfSelf | talk19:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there. You're doing some great work recently. I've bumped into you reverting vandalism 5 times this evening, you always get there before I do! Keep up the good work. You might see me around! Lunchscale19:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wow these vandals are surely active today. My fingers are about to fall off lol. good job on what ur doing as well. I noticed you are dealing with vandals on ur page to go along with the other load you have. The Anti-Vandalism King20:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's because some anti vandalism bots aren't active at the moment. Sorry, I wasn't able to figure out what you want to say with the last sentence. --Oxymoron8320:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Latin School of Chicago
Latin School's new building was recently completed and opened. (It's no longer necessary to say that construction began recently.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.28.214 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 2 Nov 2007
I'm sorry for making that wrong change
I thought i was in the sandbox page... But that was on an other open IE sreen i had
My dearest apologize
Joey —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.29.5.109 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 2 Nov 2007
I can't believe that you've mistaken several other pages for the sandbox. Anyway, thanks for your note so I was able to investigate and revert the other changes you made. --Oxymoron8316:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Lradrama has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Modla has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
ups,i removed a thing from a text,sorre,didnt know that is prohibited to edit articles! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.6.42.243 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 4 Nov 2007
It isn't prohibited to edit pages, but it is prohibited to replace them with "heya!" for no good reason. And please sign your talk page contributions with ~~~~. --Oxymoron8317:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your reversion of my edit in the Porridge article.
The reason you left on my talk page was the following:
"When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page."
Odd that you didn't spot "Changed Gröd to Grøt. (Gröd is not Norwegian.)" in the history page.
And what could be controversial about correcting obvious faulty grammar? Ö isn't even a Norwegian letter.
I'll be courteous enough to let you redo your own reversion.
The reason for the revert was, as written at your talk page, that your edit removed [more than half of the] content from the article, probably accidentally. And your edit summary doesn't explain the removal, therefore my note was appropriate. --Oxymoron8314:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently I was a bit hasty in my reaction. Since I seem to be in the wrong, I apologise.
(ec - answering to your extended comment) No IP will be blocked for one disruptive edit (except in unusual circumstances). But if there will be more vandalism edits from this IP, a block would be appropriate to protect Wikipedia. The good news is: If you create an account, you are able to continue editing although that IP might be blocked. --Oxymoron8317:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Another RfA Spaming
Thank you for supporting me in my recent RFA which did not pass at (18/27/10). I will be sure to improve my editing skills and wait until someone nominates me next time. Thank you for you comments! Tiptoety00:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DerHexer would like to nominate you for adminship!
DerHexer would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact DerHexer to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Oxymoron83. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
This is the result of an ongoing dispute and I think the more people we get to comment, the better chance we'll have of resolving the issue once and for all. You're comments would be much appreciated. Cheers. Username nought12:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User 76.29.23.218
Thanks for reverting this user's vandalism.
If you notice his contributions, they are all vandalism.
I tried to request a block, but the process wasn't clear to me.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
This user has stopped vandalizing after the level3 warning, so no immediate action is necessary. If he continues to vandalize, you should give a final warning (templates can be found here); if he vandalizes afterwards again and is active at the moment you detect these edits, you can report to WP:AIV: click on the 'edit' link right to the 'user reported' headline and you'll find an example. Regards --Oxymoron8320:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Caffeine award
Slakr's Caffeine Award
For helping out during a time when everyone else seemed asleep, I award you some caffeine for your exceptional effort. I probably would have considered giving you crack, but then you might have start reverting contribs by random people, which probably would have been a bad thing. :P
Only 0.000267% of all registered accounts have this award at their talk page, I think we can nevertheless say that we are special :) --Oxymoron8320:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello!
I copy the code into my monobook css but I don't have the "vandal fighter" that I use into the spanish wiki! Can you help to install it? Thanks! --RoyFocker17:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
NHRHS2010 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hey! Loved that really nice edit count tool you cited [2]. Just an "odd" question, curious if it counts "deleted" edits or not (those made to pages that have been deleted), which would probably account for the discrepancy between
that count and my unofficial one. Heck of a lot better than the wannabe_kate! SkierRMH08:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty good for a sock ;)... I've been accused of being a bot before, so this is something new!! I just have to decide now who my alter ego is! The possibilities are endless ;0) SkierRMH00:11, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I considered not spamming talk pages but not saying "thanks" just isn't me. The support was remarkable and appreciated. I only hope that I am able to help a little on here. Please let me know if I can help you or equally if you find any of my actions questionable. Thanks & regards --Herbytalk thyme12:38, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you both, I think the promotion will be later (time of the transclusion to the main RfA page I think). I hope this won't turn the tight ;) --Oxymoron8313:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just wondering why you declined your previous RFAs as you were very qualified for adminship well before your current RFA started AFUSCO18:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion a candidate normally should be active at least half a year before becoming an admin at that wiki. And we will never find out if an earlier RfA would have been successful ;) --Oxymoron8320:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Icestorm815 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Congratulations on becoming an admin! Here's a smiley face to help when those times of frustration come. Don't ware out your keyboard and mouse too quickly with all those new buttons! Good luck! Icestorm815 (talk) 03:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted unsourced material from Husbands and Knives and this user rvted it 3 times, i gave him the warnings (which he deleted off his talk page) what can be done to people that keep adding unsourced material. Can i be blocked for 3RR for deleting unsourced material? Ctjf8317:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Asking for sources is reasonable. Nevertheless you shouldn't revert once more. I put another 3rr warning on Tuntis' talk page with the request to add the sources and will watch the situation for now. --Oxymoron8317:38, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a certain procedure to fallow when blocking? I've seen users block indef. on the first time and others that never do that, after extreme repeats, or is it just up to your discretion? Ctjf8301:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:BLOCK#Duration_of_blocks. It's not fully clear atm if this is a static ip, too less edits. To triple the lenght of the previous block is appropriate in this case. IPs are generally not indef blocked (excluding WP:OP). Again: The IP can be reblocked, if it will be back. --Oxymoron8301:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, better a 4im-warning; and adding "Vandalism directly after release of block" or something like that to the AIV report would be excellent. --Oxymoron8301:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Missing headline 2
Hey, I got a note from you mentioning that I had edited the page about H. L. Mencken. In fact, I have not even visited this page. This must be a problem with shared IP's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.181.12.116 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 19 Nov 2007
Unlikely, the first IP is from another provider. The second IP has made only 1 edit & received no warning, no action required at the moment; but thanks for watching. --Oxymoron8320:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You A Lot!
I was accessing wikipedia from school, and someone (Deathtotheinternet) deleted a page. I know who it is its a known hacker so you should consider blocking or freezing that account. Thank yo for lifting the ban, do you know of any ways to access Wikipedia from a school computer with a different IP then the rest of the school? It would be appreciated if you had any information. Again thank you for lifting the ban. One last question, is there anyway I could get into a "class" or training or anything to become an editor and fixer like you are for Wikipedia? I hate people like deathtotheinternet, its an extreme nusince(SP?).
Thank You Very Much,
CrazySain--CrazySainCrazySain 04:12, 19 November 2007 (EST)
any reason why i am the only one getting warning from you in this "edit war" ? discrimination??
!!!
71.99.128.239 (talk)
You disagree with 2 other editors and made the most reverts, that's why I warned you first. If this continues, I can act further. --Oxymoron8301:20, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
He is also a banned troll. He's been doing this since at least february, and has accumulated no less than 8 blocks on various IPs since then. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:13, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(ec)It all began with this incident back in february, for which (along with general incivility) 71.99.120.132 (talk·contribs) was blocked. My first encounter with this user was in September with 71.99.137.24 (talk·contribs). His contributions were marked by general incivility, and a penchant for edit warring in place of even the slightest amount of discussion. He was blocked twice for these actions. He hopped around several other IPs in the 71.99.xxx.xxx range from then until now, accumulating another 7 blocks for roughly identical edits. I refer to him as a banned troll because most admins who have seen my reports of him have blocked him on sight. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A link to that IP user page when reporting would be fine. As the long retention period at AIV has shown, I'm not the only admin who hasn't heard about that. --Oxymoron8301:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Veeramanidasan
Hi Oxy, this is regarding Veeramanidasan wikipage which was recently getting vandalize by a person. It seems like you declined my requests which is quite shocked to me. As i mention, the user did not provide enough justification and reference. Since the page is contributed for a Living Person, the biography that i added was also re-edited to a talk page sentence which is totally out of sence. I have advised the user on the wikipage talk not to violate futher on the edits after a few edit warning, i requested for a page protection and its been declined by you. Please advise how i should proceed futher. I do not want to start edit war with the user and hoping to come to a conclusion. Your advise is highly appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Killerserv (talk • contribs) 04:27, 20 Nov 2007
Not to start an edit war is a good idea. If you don't come to a conclusion at the discussion page, I advise to make a demand on WP:RFC or WP:RFM. I think you both are rational enough to resolve this problem without a page protection and an user block. And please sign your talk page contributions. --Oxymoron8304:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Really no problem. Also it would be nice if you could sign the warnings you give, so that we can easier see the time the warning has been given. Thanks --Oxymoron8322:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Protecting 'Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus'
Hi,
Can you explain on its talk page why you protected this article?
There is some edit warring going on, but not very heavy (for the standards of this article). Also I am a participant in a mediation case, but that concerns actually only the use of one source on this page, and is irrelevant to the present edit warring.
I've protected the article as an uninvolved admin due to the recent precipitance in reverting without prior discussion. A couple of editors are involved, you too. The page protection has been requested at WP:RFPP. Please add issues to be mediated to the mediation page or find consensus at the talk page. Thanks --Oxymoron8323:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Port Adelaide Football Club
You do not seem to understand what goes on on this site.
It is regularly edited by fans of the opposing team in Adelaide.
They spend considerable time trying to tarnish the tradition of Port Adelaide and making sure poor performances are highlighted.
Why is it neccesary to highlight the losing score of the 2007 grand final?
Why is there so much rubbish about the 2007 heritage round. This is one round that is played every year by all 16 clubs but is only highlighted on the Port site because the Crows fans want to take a cheap shot at Port.
In 2007 Port finished 2nd of 16 after finishing 12th the year before. This is an improvement rarely seen in AFL football.
However due to biased unfavorable editing, 2007 on Wikipedia basically carries on about a couple of old players views of the heritage round and the large loss in the grand final.
If you google other famous sporting events for the largest loss in the final you have to dig deep to find what the score was.
Googlr the AFL grand final and all you get is the myriad of posts by crows supporters.
Hello Steve, I understand your position, but you disagree with several other editors, so I protected the page for some days to cool things down a bit. I can see only 2 edits on the article's talk page from you; please try to find consensus there. After the protection has expired, you can edit the page again, but please don't continue to make the same changes without discussing first. --Oxymoron8301:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
there are bands featured on wikipedia, and we get deleted? I am sure you are used to deletion complaints aren't you? All that POWER. WOW SO glad I never did donate to this. Houngan (talk) 07:23, 21 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Houngan (talk • contribs) 07:20, 21 Nov 2007[reply]
right right right, hypocrisy - I would cite the examples of articles that do not comply with those guidelines being present, but that would be a waste of time. And don't you dare patronize me telling to sign pages any which way, do you understand?
Giusepe 415
Thanks for reverting the abuse on my editor review page! I regarded this as an entirely unacceptable personal attack / death threat, and have indef blocked accordingly. If there had been any sign of productive edits from the account before, I might have considered a shorter block, but he was clearly only here to cause trouble. Regards, BencherliteTalk08:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I did! Glad to hear that you were going for the block button too - as a new admin I haven't blocked for personal attacks before, let alone an attack on myself, so I'm pleased to hear that you would have done the same anyway. Thanks. BencherliteTalk08:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
excuse me why do you keep deleting my band's page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobbyhorses (talk • contribs) 16:27, 22 Nov 2007
hello
excuse me this is very confusing you keep deleting a page about my band that i am trying to put on here. are you doing this for your own amusement or what? please stop!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobbyhorses (talk • contribs) 16:34, 22 Nov 2007
Because you didn't mention in the article why this band is notable enough to have an article at Wikipedia. Some guidelines can be found here. And please sign your talk page contributions using ~~~~--Oxymoron8316:34, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
i havent even finished it yet! i was just checking to see if i was doing it correctly. at least let me finish the god damn page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobbyhorses (talk • contribs) 16:35, 22 Nov 2007
I'm not the only person who has deleted that article. If you post the same content over and over again, this will only lead to a block of your account. If you think that your band is notable (see the link above), you should finish the article first (with a sourced claim of notability) and afterwards click 'save'. Thanks --Oxymoron8316:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
well instead of just deleting it straight away, you could have at least sent a message or something letting me know where im going wrong. for a moderator you lot arent very helpful. it just seems like none of you have anything better to do other than racing each to see who can delete articles before anyone else does. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobbyhorses (talk • contribs) 16:46, 22 Nov 2007
You've already received such a message from NawlinWiki and didn't respond. Instead of asking someone about things that remained unclear, you are reposting the article within minutes despite further warnings. Please read WP:BAND now. --Oxymoron8316:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
cheers for 'helping' out someone who has only been on here for 5 minutes. i have no idea what is going on here on why you're picking on me it must be a sad hobby of yours to have a go at new people just because they dont quite know what theyre doing yet. fuck it. im coming for you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobbyhorses (talk • contribs) 16:59, 22 Nov 2007
I'm not picking on you. Now please follow the links at your talk page, the one I've given you here and accept my advice to sign your talk page contributions. Thanks --Oxymoron8317:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Vinxx socks
One last thing on, User:Vinxx appears to be the puppet master and was blocked yesterday but only for 72 hours [5]. This was before all of the socks. I just wanted to bring this to your attention to determine if the block should be extended. It does not matter to me, I was just patrolling new users, but I thought I would bring it to the attention of an admin. Regards.--12 Noon20:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I blocked as a 'slap on the wrist'. Edits like this are generally full of emotion, and I didn't want to appear biased. If the user is now using socks, however, perhaps a longer block is in order. I was hoping a 72 hour block would dissuade him or her from making charged edits again - obviously not! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 20:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've reviewed each of her/his edits (everywhere the same political POV, no talk page edits to find consensus) and — regarding the severity level of these changes — extended to 72 months. --Oxymoron8321:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, you've beaten me to the block. The tools are very useful, and due to vacations this week I use them very often. I hope my actions help Wikipedia a bit. I try to review my decisions (later watching what had happened afterwards) and am normally pleased, but some input from outside (best per mail) would also be much appreciated if one of my decisions has caught your eye. Cheers --Oxymoron8301:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I don't doubt that this page meets CSD-G7. But if there seems to be at least a some keepworthy content (which e.g. can be included into another article; or notability unclear), I don't delete that on my own account for the above mentioned reason. --Oxymoron8319:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps a hidden message advising people not to wikilink Maria Marten and William Corder, since both names redirect back to the Red Barn? If a hidden message were put in at the top, people would stop linking the two names. What do you think? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive'20:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for protecting my userpage. The prat who is harrasing me, and going the extra mile by creating bogus accounts like "cf35" or "cf37" might stop, although I doubt it, because I think the neanderthal is using a proxy.
I created that page because I was beginning a major rewrite of the Splicers page; I noted that in the creation notes. As such, the information contained in it would've been removed from the Splicers page, as having nothing to do with the expanded material. I would appreciate it if you could return it from deleted status until I finish my article on Splicers (the rpg), which will be in a publishable form tonight. ----Mr. Nexx (talk) 05:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You know, your being an admin is bad for my blocking average. Before you used to report vandals to WP:AIV and I blocked them quite happily - hence lots of blocks :-) ... Now not only are you not reporting vandals for me to block, you're blocking those that are reported before I can. I think that's rather mean ;-).
Hi - I saw you gave a short block to 172.167.243.224(talk·contribs·deleted contribs·page moves·block user·block log) just now for vandalism - I just looked at his edits and reverted more vandalism by him, and this appears to be the same user as GoMJ1234(talk·contribs·deleted contribs·page moves·block user·block log) who was blocked a few minutes ago for vandalizing the same articles as this IP just vandalized - one page he vandalized is User:Malik Shabazz - Malik Shabazz had warned GoMJ1234 about GoMJ1234's vandalism and he retaliated by vandalizing Malik's page; same thing for the IP. Personally, I'd recommend a longer block for the IP than 3 hours - it's clearly a vandalism-only editor. Just thought I'd bring the specifics to your attention. Tvoz|talk08:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I've seen that he used that other account before, that's why I've blocked although he didn't vandalize after the level4 warning. But it's an AOL-IP, that changes every some minutes; what means (if that WHOIS is updated), he/she will have another IP soon, and possibly another user who will have been assigned this IP will be blocked for nothing. --Oxymoron8308:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ah - I hadn't looked at the IP details. This is a recurring problem that we really need to find a solution for - the vandals get away with it because we don't want to cause collateral damage - I understand the logic of that, but it's frustrating. Thanks for the reply. Meanwhile, I have the pages he's vandalized on my watchlist, and won't be surprised if he attacks mine or yours as this is his pattern. Tvoz|talk08:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You recently removed ClubTropica from Wiki, I am in no way inflicted with ClubTropica nor care if it is promoted. I posted the FACTS and this was advertising only in your opinion, you did not give me time to state my reasoning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clubtropicawiki (talk • contribs) 12:39, 24 Nov 2007
The article was as promotional as it gets (example: "it's the perfect place to relax and we guarantee no cold weather or dreary rain!"). --Oxymoron8312:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No. First: No final warning given. Second it's a shared IP, that means the person who vandalized could be someone other. Third, we never block anyone to punish him/her. --Oxymoron8307:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Are you blocking me? Tech43 (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I apologize for my actions on this page, and that one. I have talked to the user, and have apologized. thanks for the help. sayonarra. Tech43 (talk) 07:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, this is the author of the Stupid Club article. I don't know how to give credit to sources, but I can tell you that the Stupid Club quote from Kurt Cobain's mother is mentioned in Heavier Than Heaven: A Biography of Kurt Cobain. If you could help me site it I'd be much appreciative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tehphoenixdown (talk • contribs) 07:10, 25 Nov 2007
Why must i have my name removed from december the 8th just because i'm not famous? are famous people all that matter in this world? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.182.34 (talk • contribs) 11:49, 25 Nov 2007
Only people who are notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia can be added to these lists. What do you think will happen if we allow everyone to put their name in there? --Oxymoron8311:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Missing headline 4
why do you deleted promobikes? aistis[at]masina.lt —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aistis (talk • contribs) 12:47, 25 Nov 2007
hi there. i just was viewing this article...about an actress in a james bond film and up the top it said "you have new messages" i had never seen that on the many articles i had viewed before that one...
it said to stop vandalising Club Penguin...the thing is, i dont know what Club Penguin is, ive never even heard of it, and i havent been onto their page.
Halo Oxymoron93: I am endeavouring to rename four pages but as there are already redirection pages with the names I would like to call them the "move" functionality does not work. If you could please be so gracious as to inform me how to initiate a transition that ensures the entire integrity of the page and its associated discourse are translated I would be most appreciative.
All glories to you are yours
B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs)14:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
please do not remove links about Flair Bartending, those are integrated part of the Flair Bartending History and they daily contribute to spread the word of flair. These links are NOT SPAM, we are working hard to contribute to Wikipedia in several articles as well as to create useful content in our websites about bartending. What do you know about Flair Bartending? If you know a little bit about it, and you have visited the links we post, you would not remove them because you will realize that those are the most interesting and visited sites about this unusual sport. Please do NOT remove links about Flair Bartending anymore...
Thanks for your note and for welcoming me to WIKIPEDIA. I did not copy the works or articles from other pages - I compiled and edited them. I did not say I authored them. The SSEAYP page was meant for information and reference not advertisement. But because it was deleted I felt I do not deserve to contribute or edit the SSEAYP Page. But again, thanks for your help and your comment. I deeply appreciate it. I apologize if I was wrong by adding my talk/s several times and so disappointed that I told of copying works of others although I just compiled them. Jbsantos 11-24-07 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbsantos (talk • contribs) 17:55, 25 Nov 2007
Apology accepted. You've copy&pasted complete sections from other websites, this is clearly a copyright violation. Please follow the links that you have on your talk page to learn more how to write good articles. Regards --Oxymoron8322:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
At least some appreciation for the work ;) I wonder why "Britney" vandalized my user space only 2 times, but this can change... --Oxymoron8300:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the deletion of User:Ludds/Friends UBX
"Thrust Vectoring"; What is the status of my November 25, 07 contribution?
November 26, 2007, 10:34pm
Hello Oxymoron83, Editor of
"Thrust Vectoring";
What is the status of my November 25, 07 contribution?
Please ignore my previous contributions on this subject that were a first-time attempts and let me know the status of the last one from November 25, which is inline with Wikipedia standards and instructions.
Just to be sure, I re-introduce it here-below, with just 2 minor corrections adding s to 'nozzle' and replacing the example B-2 with X-36.
Anticipating your response, I remain,
sincerely
Prof. Dr. Benjamin Gal-Or
Thanks Re: The Ship for SouthEast Asian Youth Program (SSEAYP)
Thanks for your note. I will try my very best to correct the page for the sake of the young people of SouthEast Asia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbsantos (talk • contribs) 01:41, 27 Nov 2007
On User talk:Bobo192, Oxymoron83 said: Thanks for searching for a clean version on Colorado Academy. I wasn't able to find one, and when I gave up I saw that you'd already reverted :)
Unfortunately it was the most recent clean version I could find, sometimes it's amazing how keen these editors can be to make loads of vandalistic edits at once. Sometimes it's easier simply to revert all IP edits at once. Bobo.01:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Help
Hey I have been having problems with this IP. The IP has been attacking me constantly while I have been off line and as so I have not been able to revert the attacks and report the IP properly. I was wondering if you could watch or block the IP because this has been going on for some time and has been escalating Rgoodermote11:46, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've blocked for 31 hours due to other personal attacks I've found in older contributions (looks like all of them were made by the same person). A longer block can be issued if he/she continues after another final warning. --Oxymoron8311:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, but I have to say that the IP is most likely going to continue for whatever reason, I didn't even warn the IP before the attacks. Rgoodermote13:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
U Dodged up me page
You dodgified my page.
Make sure it doesen't happen again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.48.1 (talk • contribs) 12:25, 28 Nov 2007
Hi oxymoron83. I created the page Thaddeus Griffin, who is peter Griffin's brother from the tv show family guy. I have a list of references about his family (one of the sections is a list) here. But! For some reason it is not allowing me to cite the info. Could you help me with citing his family members, and because I have them allhere it shouldn't take any longer than about 10 mins.
Take a look at the article; It contains a section about his family. A few of the members do not have a wikipedia page, but a bio on Family Guy's 'wikia' page; So, I wanted to put links (refs) about these members linking to the site with the charecters bio's on.(this is the site)
Basiclly it's probably the only site with his whole family on. even family guy's official site does'nt have any bio's, and without the citing, the article may be deleted.
I also wasn't able to find another source; but a reference to a Wikia won't help you in a deletion discussion (it's the same as if there were no source). Are you sure this character is notable at all? There has to be some real-world information. If you find sourced real world information, notability should be established, this is imo more important as to source the character list. --Oxymoron8314:33, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. There is a non-working template (commonscat| xxx ) near the end of the article. I'm not familiar with the use of templates; could you take a look and possibly fix it? Thanks. Dougz1 (talk) 22:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see, the template is producing the Wikimedia box. Told you I wasn't familiar with templates, lol. Sorry to send you on a wild goose chase. Dougz1 (talk) 23:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
66.118.242.7 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
