User talk:SmileToday

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Due to the large amount of work I recieve daily, I may not be active in editing as much. Messages left may not be notcied for some time, but will get a reply. Thank you. ---SmileToday

This user scored 800 on the Wikipediholic test.

vn-2

This user talk page has been vandalized 2 times.

excl

This editor is an exclusionist.

C-4

This user is an expert C programmer.

This is my talk page. Please start a new section for any new comments and remember to sign all messages with 4 tildes(~~~~). If the topic concerns me, I will reply here, and if it concerns you or an article, I will reply at your talk page and here unless otheriwse specified. Thank you and have a nice day☻. SmileToday

Note: Discussion Is Most Likely Fragmented, but if you prefer to keep discussion in one location, please let me know

Policies/Guidelines/Essays for this Page

Talk Page Guidelines * Stay Cool

Don't Bite the Newcomers * No Personal Attacks

Civility * Resolving Disputes

No Legal Threats * Assume Good Faith

Assume the Assumption of Good Faith

Welcome!

Hello, SmileToday, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Figma 22:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert on RuneScape

Thanks for reverting that stuff in RuneScape just now. (I was about to, but one of my programs was acting up and making me lag.) However, I just wanted to note that "vandalism" was a bit of a harsh term for User:The knowledge of god's edits, which I think were in good faith. So, just a reminder: Don't forget to assume good faith. Pyrospirit ^{Flames Fire} 23:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder, sometimes I do tend to get a little carried away. SmileToday☺(talk to me , My edits) 23:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you warned 67854678907 (talk • contribs) for vandalism, although that user only reverted vandalism by Sumo777 (talk • contribs) at about the same time. I've sorted it out, so don't worry. Sometimes the vandals start to swarm like that, and it gets very confusing. :-) CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 01:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you mean. I just got warned by an anti-vandalism bot for vandalizing a page. When I clicked on the diff link, I found that two users in a row had vandalized, and the second replaced the vandalism of the first with some nonsense. When I reverted using some JavaScript, it only reverted the edits by the one user, thus making it look like I added the vandalism that the first person added. What I really did was accidentally revert back to a version that had been vandalized even worse. >_< Confused? Me too. Pyrospirit ^{Flames Fire} 02:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see I'm not the only one that reverts to vandalism happen to. Well, accidents happen, and the only thing to do is to move on. (I'm supposed to be on break but I couldn't stay away) SmileToday☺(talk to me , My edits) 19:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ricy

Copied from User_talk:Academic Challenger:

I just thought I would let you know that the User:Ricy made those last 2 vandalism edits a day before final warnings were added, and that Ricy was not given a warning that they could be blocked before today. SmileToday☺(talk to me , My edits) 20:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, but I felt that his edits clearly showed that he was an acount created only for vandalism. Academic Challenger 20:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the quick reply. SmileToday☺(talk to me , My edits) 20:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Minor Edits

I'll set that In my pref- because I've got a ton more to do. Thanks for catching that. Regards, Razorclaw 21:17, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Thanx for restoring my userpage from its vandalism. «razorclaw» 21:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome! :) SmileToday☺(talk to me , My edits) 21:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me.

I check out what's going on. Thanks for letting me know. Regards, «razorclaw» 22:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :-) SmileToday☺(talk to me , My edits) 00:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

98E

Please do not perform edits for blocked users in the future. I realize you were trying to be helpful but blocks are put in place for a reason. Picaroon (Talk) 22:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know that. SmileToday☺(talk to me , My edits) 23:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Substitutions

Copied from User_talk:FeralDruid:

Hi, and please remember to always substitute all user warning templates with a subst: after the opening brackets ( {{ ). If you have any questions, please contact me. Thanks! SmileToday☺(talk to me , My edits) 19:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You just updated my talk page, commenting on using substitutions. What was this edit in regards to? FeralDruid 19:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from User_talk:FeralDruid:

Basically, when you warn a user for vandalizing, blanking, (etc), you usually warn them with a message like {{uw-vandalism1}}, or something like that. What you should do, is you should usually put a Subst: right after the {{ of the template {{uw-vandalism1}} so that it looks like {{subst:Uw-vandalism1}}. This helps users see the current version of the message and not a dynamic one. It is a problem because there are thousands (possibly more) of these messages added a day, and editing the page Template:uw-vandalism1 would change all of the {{uw-vandalism1}}'s, which uses a lot of server resources. Substituting them with subst: helps because it keeps the version static. If you have any other questions, please ask again on my talk page, and I will try to explain further or redirect you to some written information. Thanks! SmileToday☺(talk to me , My edits) 19:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Misc

Yes the ip is me, but I really was messing around and there is no need to undo your edits. The external link "crash-ie.html" I don't know if it does what it says or not, I just have it up there. I'm considering taking the user message down because I'm bored with it and its unattractive. Thanks for keeping an eeeeeyyyyyyeeeee! on my userspace. Regards, «razorclaw» 21:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for testing. I'll remove it. Regards, «razorclaw» 22:39, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

I'm glad you did this after I was done testing my css. :P

Put this into your User:SmileToday/monobook.css:

.usermessage {

  background-color: #dcdcdc;
  border: 1px solid #7b68ee;
  color: #696969;
  font-weight: normal;
  font-size:1;   
  margin: 2em 0em 1em 0em;
  padding: 0.5em 1em;
  vertical-align: middle;
  -moz-border-radius-topleft: 1em; 
  -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 1em;
  -moz-border-radius-topright: 1em; 
  -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 1em;
  text-align: center;

}

ctlr + F5 then ask me to leave you a message.

Regards, R⇦T⇨C 21:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's looks great, now new messages won't come as such a shock. Thanks, have a nice day. SmileToday☺(talk to me , My edits) 20:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What it does is make the user message bar light gray and the border a nice light blue. The text is silver and the links are blue. The message is not in bold and the corners are rounded. I'm better at css than at js. Regards, R⇦T⇨C 21:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jimmmmm Portrait.jpg

Thanks for adding {{db-i4}} to Image:Jimmmmm Portrait.jpg. Please realize that it is in both Category:Images with unknown copyright status as of 9 May 2007 and Category:Images with unknown source as of 9 May 2007. Administrators work through those dated categories as quickly as we can, but there is frequently a backlog of a couple days to more than a week. ~ Bigr Tex 22:50, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Your edit to List of Warriors characters

Thanks for being honest with me, SmileToday. I did intend on doing good to the pages, but the pages were just being abused so much that I thought I had no choice. I don't get ALL of the functions and rules of Wikipedia YET, but I understand what you're saying. I'll see to requesting that the page be semi-locked for a period of time. Sorry if I've caused any trouble with you or anyone else. Thanks again, Spottedstar 19:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for addressing the IP who vandalised my userpage. It was helpful. ~Crowstar~ 14:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, P.S... Thanks for being nice. Keep editing!

~Crowstar~ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

~Crowstar~ 16:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sure thing

ill have it up in a hour or two let me reread it and ill expand it!TheManWhoLaughs 23:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Pear

Sorry about editing the comments on Talk:Pear, the comment in question regarding apple being in the Pyrus genus in the article was mine, which I forgot to sign. Bumper12 18:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

look it up

the article "Nicanor Fulgencio" was a joke my friend made online, its my name. look it up, noone of that name was ever a sicilian crime boss.....

Thank You

Hey, this is just a big thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page. Those darn vandals are too much sometimes.Gan fon 20:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Barnstar

Thanks very much for the barnstar! It was quite unexpected, but quite welcome as well. :-) Hersfold ^(talk/work) 21:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary + minor edits.

Reply: I will do my best, though I have never misused the minor edit option in the way that is implied Dapi89 21:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Just realised, ignore this. Confused the message with the template textDapi89 16:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: [1]

I've got WerdnaBot/Shadowbot3 set for archiving once a week. What is the amount of time I need to set it for? BTW, I lost a few pages due to my delete-happy typing. I was just trying to get a few of those pages back. Regards, Razorclaw (talk · contribs) 19:50, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Category:Images with no fair use rationale - Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline Regards, Razorclaw (talk · contribs) 20:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DC Meetup notice

Greetings. There is going to be a Washington DC Wikipedia meetup on next Saturday, July 21st at 5pm in DC. Since you are listed in Category:Wikipedians_in_Delaware, I thought I'd invite you to come. I'm sorry about the short notice for the meeting. Hopefully we'll do somewhat better in that regard next time. If you can't come but want to make sure that you are informed of future meetings be sure to list yourself under "but let me know about future events", and if you don't want to get any future direct notices \(like this one\), you can list yourself under "I'm not interested in attending any others either" on the DC meetup page.--Gmaxwell 22:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey those claims i made about george bush are real...! i know him...!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarim123 (talk • contribs) 00:53, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks a lot for the reply Chloejr 09:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Skydive westernport

Sorry about putting the AfD tag over your speedy tag. I had tagged it for speedy deletion before (and had it deleted), but I want to get consensus on its deletion so if keeps coming up, it can be deleted as recreation of deleted material. Cheers, Mattinbgn\^talk 01:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Madden

The last time I checked, Josh Madden is a fictional character on a daytime soap opera. He is not a living person. As far as the unreferenced or controversial nature of his statutory rape of another fictional character, you have me baffled. Aren't half the things that soap characters do fictional? I really don't understand your problem with the edit. 74.95.182.169 18:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]