Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 July 4

< July 3	July 5 >

July 4

Image:How I Learnt to Stop Worrying.jpg

this image is clearly an album cover, and I doubt it was released into the public domain. --Haemo 04:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC) The photgraph of Dwarkanath Ganguly was published in The Bethune School and College Centenary Volume, published in 1949 to commemorate the centenary of the institution. It did not have any copyright. I have a copy of the publication. Moreover, Dwarkanath Ganguly died in 1898, which was more than 100 years ago. - P.K.Niyogi 00:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Heliogracie.gif

no sign that the source website released this under the gfdl ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 01:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gracie_Family.jpg

no sign that the source website released this under the gfdl ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 01:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:John_Hillcoat_(footballer).jpg

no evidence for GNU Bleh999 01:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Guildview.PNG

Webshots not automaticly PD ShakespeareFan00 09:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MCFCAirport.jpg

newspaper scan (C) - presumably with newspaper ShakespeareFan00 10:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Franco_offside.jpg

No source has been provided, outside of "self" in the GFDL-self tag. ~~The uploader is 24 years old (per his user page) and the image was taken 28 years ago.~~ Also the cropping and framing of the image suggests that the image was likely used on a webpage. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 11:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image was taken three years ago, in a game for the 2005 Mexican semi-finals! It shows a player in offside position. It is outrageous to claim that the image was taken 28 years ago! Who came up with this, anyway? Hari Seldon 15:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 28 years is an my extrapolation. I assumed that "Clásico 79" refered to 1979 - my apologies. I still question with the corner cropped off and the black frameing that this is still your own image and not used on a website. While I know its not a big issue here at PUI, the image was and still remains orphaned.--User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WWAeurobelt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Claims GFDL, but I doubt the WWA have released the belt design... ShakespeareFan00 11:45, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:4-9 v2.jpg

listed as being the property of the creator, but comments clearly show that it was copyrighted for a band, even if the uploader is the photographer --Haemo 04:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the uploader is the photographer he owns the copyright unless it was a 'work for hire', specifically defined in a contract before the photograph was taken, and not all countries recognize such a concept. Bleh999 12:44, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dwarkanath_Ganguly.jpg

Listed under GFDL, but source/copyright cannot be verified. Videmus Omnia 00:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:507287_356x237.jpg

No evidence that rhapsody.com has released the image into the public domain, and given the history of the image, I'm not so sure about the licensing unless we can better verify it. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 01:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader keeps deleting notices from the images and changing the license from PD self to GNU to copyrighted fair use, I think this image has already been deleted several times. Bleh999 04:34, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Paul-barresi2jpg.jpg

No source given, no verification of PD-release. Videmus Omnia 02:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader says "provided by subject" but it is missing a OTRS ticket, maybe the uploader can provide it Bleh999 04:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Humus with hania.jpg

Clearly impossible for anyone to have taken this image freely unless they were there in person, which I doubt is possible given the circumstances of Johnston's kidnapping and release. This image is likely taken from a TV grab or press report. – Chacor 14:04, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have been told that the above image (that you tagged) is from here (see my talk page).

Image:Reflexz.gif

Webshot ShakespeareFan00 14:20, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forest.ogg

[this listing not completed by User:ShakespeareFan00]

Hello,

I have uploaded this music sample on WP but it says it is unfree. I want to tell that this music sample has been made by me. It is my own work and it is only available for Wikipedia articles. Thanks, Sgt. Pepper's * | Talk with the Sergent | on 16:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia-only is problematic, If it's your own work a CC-SA or GFDL type release would be preferable. ShakespeareFan00 19:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Metallica lisbon2007.jpg

[this listing not completed by User:ShakespeareFan00]

They are available on my flickr website http://www.flickr.com/photos/marioguilherme like all the others I upload to wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mariogui (talk • contribs). Note: this was moved from Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/NewListings. howcheng {chat} 18:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Although the uploader has them as "all rights reserved" on flickr, if they are his images then he has the right to release them on wikipedia. There is a problem, however, as they contain watermarks which aren't allowed. Madmedea 19:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So we need to know if the photographer owns the rights to the photos or if he was commissioned by Media Capital Radio whether they own the rights - as the current situation is contradictory. Madmedea 10:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HM.jpg

no source, no proof that uploader owns copyright ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 18:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bibigaytanbikini.jpg

likely copyvio After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 18:50, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bibigaytancollage.JPG

copyvio collage of multiple images After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 19:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gerard_Way_in_2006.jpg

Uploader says he took the picture himself, but it's quite obviously scanned from a magazine article (Entertainment weekly 37 if you check the lower right corner). Sherool (talk) 20:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kodak-style CAP code on film edge.jpg

Copyright holder unclear, see talk page. Current license is for Wikipedia use only. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 21:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BMW 803.jpg

Used by permission only, replaceable. The object is available at the Deutsches Museum, and photography is allowed within the museum. See [1], which states "The use of cameras (still and video) is permitted for private purposes." —Remember the dot ^(talk) 21:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not used by permission, permission granted to use as we see fit. Why did you believe otherwise? Maury 21:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no indication that the permission to use this image extends to 3rd parties. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 21:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of indication, it's freely distributable. All of the images on the AESH site, at least the ones I have seen, are free to distributed. But don't believe me, just ask Richard, there's a mailto on the site here.

Image:Fusor running.jpg

Used only by permission, does not qualify as fair use. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 21:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]