User talk:Battleofalma

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Battleofalma! Thank you for your contributions. I am KTC and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! KTC (talk) 15:32, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Scotty has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Scotty was changed by Battleofalma (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.984855 on 2014-02-10T10:40:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal_acquaintances

Hi, if you join the Personal acquaintances project, I'll be glad to verify you... Ter-burg (talk) 08:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WP:Personal acquaintances

This is a confirmed main account and not a sock puppet.
(→ Verify - info)
→ I have met this user, verify!

Hello Battleofalma, nice to have met you in real life! If you would like to spread the word on your user page, you can add {{User Personal acquaintances}}. To check for other people you have already met and are registered, too, please go to tools.wmflabs.org/pb/beta/users. --.js (talk) 01:28, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Meow

I didn't know you were interested in military history lol. Shiningroad (talk) 22:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing sends me to sleep better than Lawrence Olivier talking about German forces launching Operation Barbarossa, over grainy black and white footage of men riding on the back of trucks or operating artillery.--Battleofalma (talk) 09:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 00:34, Thursday, October 31, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited London Fields Brewery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hackney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, will fix. --Battleofalma (talk) 11:29, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for London Fields Brewery

On 22 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article London Fields Brewery, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that when it opened in 2011, London Fields Brewery was the first commercial brewery to be opened in Hackney since the 19th century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/London Fields Brewery. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Battleofalma. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Wikimania Jury Questions - Important.
Message added 02:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Go Phightins! 02:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Russian criminal tattoos

Hello! Your submission of Russian criminal tattoos at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ Rob^Talk 12:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Russian criminal tattoos

On 17 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Russian criminal tattoos, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that just wearing an "unearned" criminal tattoo (pictured) in a Russian prison could lead to beatings or murder by other inmates? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Russian criminal tattoos. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Russian criminal tattoos

Hi,

I have seen your article on Russian underworld tattoos. If you are a non-native Russian speaker (and I guess you are one), this is a very good attempt. I would say surprisingly very good. Still, as a native Russian who have read about and seen "the material" alive many times, I see some inconsistencies and minor mistakes, so I will try to correct them. BTW, the Russian criminal tattoo motifs are oftentimes intervowen with those of sailors and soldiers. Also, the Soviet gangster culture heavily borrowed from Germans, Jews, Georgians, Armenians, Romanis, Asians, etc.

Best regards, Lamro (talk) 06:50, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I tried my best (I'm not a Russian speaker at all), but if you can help at all with the Cyrillic translations of certain words that would be great. The research was mostly taken from four books which are compilations from these writers Danzig Baldaev (a former prison guard) and some other criminologists and ethnographers.

Some of the sources and accounts are slightly contradictory, and the meanings changed over time. I tried to keep the article historic, as the "golden era" of these tattoos seems to be late 1930s to the 1960s. After that the Vory v Zakone structure breaks down and the tattoos have less meaning and consistency.

If you have any other good sources for this please let me know, but I assume a lot of them are in Russian.Battleofalma (talk) 09:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the Baldayev's book is considered to be a fundamental reference book and a prime source on this theme. Many other sources copy his research and borrow drawings from his book. I don't know whether the book is available in English, but if you use it as a source, that is, I guess, the best option available. Baldayev was a high-profile officer (a one-star general as far as I remember -- and that was quite a rank) whithin the Soviet penetentiary and law-enforcement system, so his research is comprehensive and is based on his real-life experience and passion. I guess his research was classified for years and was used to train junior police officers. It was initially published in the early 1990s as I remember. I will check the Russian spellings and add some other inputs, as I like the article.

Lamro (talk) 10:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Personal acquaintances: you are confirmed!

Hello Battleofalma, You are now confirmed! Welcome!

You can add this box to your userpage: {{User:Romaine/Persönliche Bekanntschaften/box}} This works on de-wiki, en-wiki, fr-wiki, nl-wiki, Commons, Meta, Wikidata, WMBE-wiki, WMNL-wiki and can be requested on other wiki's.
The list of English participants is on Wikipedia:Personal acquaintances/Participants.
- To stay informed, add this page to your watchlist.
For a complete overview of all participants, see here.
You can confirm others at: this page.

Romaine (talk) 14:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Architecturalassociationeditathon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 09:29, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Given your background, you jolly well ought to know that a page like that goes in the Wikipedia: namespace. And you do not use external link format for wikilinks. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:36, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help.--Battleofalma (talk) 10:46, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Project WP:Personal acquaintances confirmations

auf Deutsch | Česky | in het Nederlands

Hello Battleofalma!
You were confirmed for the third time a few months ago. Thus you have enough confirmations to certify other people which you know personally. You can look up your obtained confirmations here. If you have any questions then ask them there. The full list of participants is here - you will know a lot of them! Best regards –.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Louisa de Rothschild

Hello Battleofalma,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Louisa de Rothschild for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 19:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 14 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Hibo Wardere page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Battleofalma. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rose Evansky

The article Rose Evansky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

insufficient evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

famousbirthdays.com is not a reliable source

Hi Battleofalma . I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 19:34, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Forests of Sweden

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.borealforest.org/world/world_sweden.htm. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Diannaa, thanks, have rewritten again. Would argue that it's sufficiently different from original source material now.Battleofalma (talk) 14:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing that. I've done some further re-writing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please support the Sustainability Initiative!

Hi, Battleofalma! Please allow me to follow up on a project that was discussed at the Wikimedia Conference in Berlin a couple of weeks ago:

I am writing you to ask for your support for the Sustainability Initiative, which aims at reducing the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement. Over the past two years, more than 250 Wikipedians from all over the world have come together to push the Wikimedia movement towards greater sustainability.

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has recently passed a resolution stating that the Foundation is committed to seeking ways to reduce the impact of its activities on the environment. Now, we are working with the Wikimedia Foundation staff to have all Wikimedia servers run on renewable energy by 2019.

In order to demonstrate that this is an issue that the community really cares about, I would like to ask you to sign the project page as well. Thank you! --Gnom (talk) 15:16, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Battleofalma. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red focus on the British Isles

I thought you might be interested to know that Wikipedia:Women in Red will be focusing on the British Isles from 1 to 31 January 2018. Please feel free to add red links on British women and/or their works on the meetup page or let me know of any pertinent lists on my talk page. Below is the invitation we will be sending shortly to WiR members and participants. Please feel free to forward it to anyone you think might be interested, including your WMUK colleagues.--Ipigott (talk) 08:28, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January highlights

		Welcome to Women in Red's January 2018 worldwide online editathons. New: "Prisoners" New: "Fashion designers" New: "Geofocus: Great Britain and Ireland" Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 08:28, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Telgraf (Kurdish newspaper)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Telgraf (Kurdish newspaper), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Boleyn (talk) 17:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. If you post an article it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Your only reference in your original post was the newspaper itself, clearly not an independent third-party source. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls; your formatting was correct.
Your entire text was Telgraf is a Kurdish language newspaper based in London.. There is nothing there to indicate that the newspaper meets the notability criteria linked above. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the verified circulation, number of employees, turnover or profits.
the paper is notable for being the first and only Kurdish and Turkish language newspaper in the UK no independent source to support that claim, Dogus is connected to the publication. Also, that isn't enough. For all we know, it may sell 10 copies, which wouldn't make it notable even if the claim was true. it is important to the Kurdish diaspora and its content is used elsewhere; that's as may be, but however worthy it is, the article must meet our criteria.
the version I deleted as spam was not the version that existed after your last edit. Much additional text was added by Nisêbîn, spamming on behalf of the publication, eg We provide information on political, social, cultural, education, health and lifestyle matters that may impact their lives. We hope to...
there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to affiliated sites.
If you also have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Battleofalma. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Battleofalma|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read this important guidance. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Abdullah Öcalan were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. JesseRafe (talk) 18:17, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, my mistake. Battleofalma (talk) 11:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

A kitten for you!A kitten for you!A kitten for you!A kitten for you!A kitten for you!A kitten for you!A kitten for you!A kitten for you!A kitten for you!

GreenBlackViolet (talk) 18:54, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move vs copy-paste

There's a small problem with copy-pasting a draft article from user space into article space, as you did with User:Delphine Dallison/Tep Vanny and Tep Vanny. The text copy doesn't carry over the edit history from the draft, so it breaches our requirements for attribution. There's more detail at WP:CUTPASTE. I've commented at WP:ANI #Sort of copy-and-paste move and suggested deleting the article and letting Delphine move the draft when she's ready. That would lose your last couple of edits to the article you pasted, but you could easily re-do them in Delphine's draft. It's possible that an admin will simply do a history merge, and maybe that will be ok, but it's always best to let article creators move their own work into mainspace – it's a rewarding part of the experience! Cheers --RexxS (talk) 20:06, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, forgot about the attribution. Thanks. Battleofalma (talk) 20:49, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Parliamentary Approval for Military Action has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Parliamentary Approval for Military Action. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 05:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UK parliamentary approval for military action has been accepted

UK parliamentary approval for military action, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:51, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Nan Ino Cooper) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Nan Ino Cooper, Battleofalma!

Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Very nice job on the article, keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GLAM Bush Theater

Hi! I also wanted to let you know that I can be pinged if you have any editors participating in the editathon that are having trouble referencing their articles. I have access to a lot of databases behind paywalls and I'm happy to help. I'm also happy to do copyedit and cleanup. Just make sure people post on my talk page or ping me so I know to take a look. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, we managed to create one good article between the 4 of us, Natasha Gordon. Battleofalma (talk) 11:00, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creating articles with no content/references when there are drafts written by others

Hey. I've noticed that a lot of the articles you created were created with no content or references (e.g. Polly Neate vs Draft:Polly Neate, Nan Ino Cooper vs Draft:Nan ino cooper), when others had already created substantial drafts for the same subject. If you spot a draft that is ready for the mainspace, you can just move it to the main space rather than creating blank articles and waiting for the contents from the draft to be copied over. Bennv3771 (talk) 05:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-and-pasting other editors' drafts to create your own articles like Feminist Internet (collective) vs Draft:The Feminist Internet (collective) is a serious copyright violation. In the future, please either write the article on your own or move other editors' drafts to the mainspace instead of re-creating it. Bennv3771 (talk) 05:37, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you came across this because you were blanking my Sabrina (graphic novel) article and redirecting to your version instead of just building up the existing article with copy from your draft, which I feel somewhat blunts your point about respecting other users' contributions and their right to be credited. But back to your original point, thanks, I understand that and its been discussed. These copy/paste jobs were done with consent at events due to new editors being unable to create new pages. Unfortunately the restriction of permissions for new editors means they cannot create without assistance. Battleofalma (talk) 10:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I turned Sabrina (graphic novel) into a redirect rather than requesting a histmerge as I did for the other articles as the "comics" disambiguator should be used anyway (WP:NCCDAB) and there was nothing new in Sabrina (graphic novel) to merge that didn't already exist in the draft. If you'll like to request a histmerge, go ahead. It's good to know the copy and pastes were done with permissions from the authors, but wouldn't it be more appropriate and inline with policy to just move the articles to the mainspace for them? Bennv3771 (talk) 10:50, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It included two categories not included in the current page as well as information about a publisher, so regardless of how small, it did have content that wasn't in your draft. Not sure it needed a new title. Largely because Sabrina is a standalone graphic novel and not a collected set of comics so the title is somewhat misleading and implies that it is a series. Also (WP:NCCDAB) doesn't actually mandate "(comics)" over "(graphic novel)". Battleofalma (talk) 11:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NCCDAB doesn't mandate it but it does recommend it. Neither of the categories apply since the diffusing subcategory of the "Graphic novels" category was already included and the draft was not a stub. Still, I'll request a histmerge. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Um no need to thank me... lol I know I probably made your day less pleasant. Still, I hope there's no hard feelings. The histmerge has been requested. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:22, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, no it's fine. It's just a bit frustrating to see (even a small amount) of work you've done supplanted by someone else's first thing in the morning. Though I appreciate we're working with the same goal and the article you've written is very good. Battleofalma (talk) 11:24, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The histmerge was declined due to overlapping edits. I have however nominated Sabrina for DYK and would be happy to add you as a co-nominator if you so wish. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:36, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Happy with that. Battleofalma (talk) 16:07, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sabrina (comics)

On 18 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sabrina (comics), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sabrina, a critique of the modern "fake news" era, is the first graphic novel to be longlisted for the Booker Prize? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sabrina (comics). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sabrina (comics)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Battleofalma. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you for the help today!

Jamierhodes (talk) 23:33, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User rights grant

I revoked your grant to Wikimedia Österreich as the user account is not permitted under policies on the English Wikipedia. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, which policies? I understand that this account is de facto single user. But it's ok, there's a better solution I think. Battleofalma (talk) 09:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thiago Silva, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:46, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

replyto:Mattythewhite, restored with wikilink to article. No need for citation as self-evident. Battleofalma (talk) 12:33, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Highland clearances reversion

I reverted your edit[1] on Highland clearances. The concept that some of those evicted were squatters is not widely understood by some readers and therefore, to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia, needs a brief reinforcing note of explanation. This concept is well supported by the references to the article. Please discuss on the article talk page if you disagree.ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 11:27, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ThoughtIdRetired: Thanks for notifiying me. The issue is that this note does not represent a Neutral Point of View: Noting that some Highlanders had "no right to be there in the first place" assumes a position on the side of the lawmakers and landowners and that of private property rights over common property rights. This somewhat misses the point of the whole article.

It would be more accurate to at least amend to "no legal rights" so I may proceed as such. Battleofalma (talk) 12:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You differentiate between "legal right" and "common property rights". By the latter, I presume you are referring to the principle of dùthchas. This clan duty/obligation is commonly superficially treated. However, it is clear that the right of clan members to occupy clan lands is more limited than most believe - it was a right to some land somewhere in the clan lands, but not a specific piece of land. Furthermore, some squatters were not clan members and some were those who had been evicted from elsewhere, by the same landlord or by other landlords. I fail to understand how any explanatory note of what constitutes a "squatter" is (a) contrary to the facts or (b) not of assistance to the user of this encyclopedia. I appreciate that for many, there is a presumption that the highland landlord should be viewed as an evil tyrant and it is wrong to do anything that hints at seeing things from their point of view. However, that is the language of the books sold in quantities to American tourists in Highland gift shops. The academic studies are much more balanced (and constitute the majority of the references on this article). It is this academic balance that this article strives to maintain. Deletion of this explanatory note would suggest an ambition to move away from the point of balance found in academic work.

It would very much complicate matters to substitute "legal right" for "right" as that would confuse the issue with the significant proportion of tenants who had no legal lease of their holding, yet were rent-paying tenants of the estate. Many of these tenants refused leases as they felt this removed their rights under dùthchas - of course, we can see now that they were misguided in this as the landlords had abandoned that principle before the tenants fully understood that it had gone. Nevertheless, they were recognised as tenants by the landlords.

I am very aware that I have cited no particular references to support what I say here. That is because this is a distillation of the entire reference base of the article.ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 13:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"I appreciate that for many, there is a presumption that the highland landlord should be viewed as an evil tyrant and it is wrong to do anything that hints at seeing things from their point of view. However, that is the language of the books sold in quantities to American tourists in Highland gift shops" - Really no need for this.

To clarify, on which basis did squatters not have the right to be on the land? The purpose of the sentence "not everyone who was evicted was a rent-paying tenant. Some had no right to be there in the first place." is not to explain what constitutes a squatter because it does not do that, but to explain that not all evictees were tenants. Once this has been explained ("not everyone who was evicted was a rent-paying tenant") any commentary on their "right to be there in the first place" is extraneous and hardly represents a "point of balance found in academic work". Battleofalma (talk) 12:20, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The form of words used is actually very close to something that is in a work written by a historian working in this field. (I often find that a defect of my editing is copying text from sources too closely and then having to revise to avoid plagiarisation.) In looking for explanation of the term "squatter", the problem is that Squatter is written with current events in mind and - with not everyone having an understanding of the term - some clarification may be needed. There are, of course, instances of people who may have permission to occupy land without paying rent - for instance in lieu of pension. I think, also, that any in depth study of the relationship between tenant and landlord in the Highlands shows that some tenants were not at all averse to taking advantage of their remoteness from any control of their activities. Whist we might all be aware of the lovely quote: "I am ashamed to confess it now that I trembled more before the factor than I did before the Lord of Lords".^[1]^: 218 - there were residents of the Highlands who definitely broke the rules. Consider the number who were caught poaching or running unlicensed whisky stills (1,000 illegal stills confiscated in 1782). In achieving a balance, it is important not to fall into the trap of presuming that the Highlander was some innocent victim of everything that happened. Some (obviously not the majority) were taking advantage at times. That is what "had no right to be there" is intended to convey. It is a serious attempt to retain balance.

I acknowledge that my remark about the huge quantity of poor quality books on the Highland clearances may have been unnecessary in making my point to you. However, if you wish to see serious academics make exactly the same sort of remark, see the introduction written by Tom Devine to his The Scottish Clearances: A History of the Dispossessed, 1600-1900 - he really lays into the misunderstandings of Americans obsessed with a supposed Highland ancestry (pg 11 ridicules a Texan lady who was very upset to discover that her Scottish ancestors came from the Lowlands - somewhat unfair, I thought). And, there is a lot more from Devine in this theme. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 13:12, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're mistaking criticism of the neutrality of wording on Wikipedia for being a purveyor of "electronic graffiti” posted on the web by a “worldwide network of Highland sympathisers” perhaps.^[2] I think we're in furious agreement over some things in that I do not think the clearances were a genocide, but I think you're taking Devine's and Richards' theses on the clearances as the only views worth hearing. I'm sure someone like John Prebble's work is anathema to you but it is on the current reading lists on the subject of at least one Scottish university and as such represents a significant point of view.^[3] Also as to "I am very aware that I have cited no particular references to support what I say here. That is because this is a distillation of the entire reference base of the article", beware of the editorialising nature of synthesis. Battleofalma (talk) 16:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I note your comments. If you criticise (perhaps rightly) the reliance I place on Richards and Devine's work - who else do you propose as reliable sources from the various academics who have written on the subject? I have done my best to access others (Robert Dodgshon is a useful example), but the problem is that Richards and Devine have done a lot of the basic research on the subject and Devine is a prolific writer. James Hunter is a counterbalance - if only from an emotional point of view. Unfortunately he has a track record of putting forward theses that are demolished by others. A good example of this is the way he picked evidence of badly behaving landlords during the Highland potato famine and extrapolated that into all the landlords acting in this way (put forward in The Making of the Crofting Community). Then Devine published his detailed study of the Highland potato famine (The Great Highland Famine, etc. ) in which he gave detailed and irrefutable evidence of the incorrectness of Hunter's account, using a virtually complete selection of sources. Hunter goes so far as to acknowledge this in preface of the second edition of The Making of the Crofting Community - and I note that this preface is brought to the attention of students in the reading list that you cite (though for different reasons). There is further reason to question some of Hunter's work as he is now being challenged on his views about the origins of the Crofter's war - see The Invention of the Crofting Community: Scottish History’s Elision of Indigenous Identity, Ideology and Agency in Accounts of Land Struggle in the Modern Gàidhealtachd The Scottish Historical Review, Volume XCVIII,1: No. 246: April 2019, 71–102 DOI: 10.3366/shr.2019.0380. To list other notable writers of whom one needs to be cautious, something like Bumsted's The People's Clearance comes to mind, (a work which was somewhat adversely reviewed by Eric Richards in SHR).

You mention Prebble being in the reading list of a university course. If you read the course summary, you will see why. There are other works in the same list that are probably there for the student to criticise, rather than empathise with. If you read a lot of Richards' work (especially after he had been in various teaching posts for a while), he sometimes has a somewhat difficult style in which he mixes ideas he does not support with his own - so one needs to pay attention to pull out the arguments he is making. It is all about teaching students to be historians rather than teaching them history. Looking at WP:RS and WP:HISTRS I think one would be entitled to suggest that Prebble is not a reliable source due to (1) not being written by an academic historian and (2) being substantially out of date, with the vast preponderance of writing on the subject postdating its publication. (Of course there are shades of grey in the matter of source selection.) Without doubt, Prebble is important, but he is still not a reliable source. That is why this work appears in the Further Reading section of the article. (Yes, the Further Reading section does not follow the style guide rules for this, but it seemed appropriate for that rule to be broken in this case - to give the reader a balanced reading list - it has some similarities to the university reading list you cite.)

Looking to other, less well-known academics, once could conclude that many regard the clearances as a largely completed task - so we find, for instance, Annie Tindley writing about the post-clearance period (as does Ewan Cameron in his Recovering from the Clearances) - but such historians appear to me (and, of course, I may be wrong) to accept the Richards/Devine view as the consensus when they embark on their various projects.

I note your remark about synthesis. It is a continual problem with Wikipedia that if an editor immerses themselves in a subject, they are in the strong position of being able to summarise, but the weak position of then struggling to pull together all the references that support that viewpoint. I am the first to challenge another editor for a reference - hence what was intended as a somewhat confessional apology for the lack of sources.

Sorry to ramble on at such length. Yes it may well be that "legal right" would be a better form of words - I have possibly spent too much time arguing with editors who have have more cultural anger than historical understanding on this subject. You must excuse a slight hint of burn-out. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 22:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Devine, T M (1994). Clanship to Crofters' War: The social transformation of the Scottish Highlands (2013 ed.). Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-9076-9.
^ "Cruelty, Grievance, Denial". www.drb.ie. Retrieved 15 August 2019.
^ "The Highland Clearances". rl.talis.com. Retrieved 15 August 2019.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Battleofalma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

blocked erroneously because I let another user login on my device at an event to check his user status. Said user, User:Burne-Jones appears to have been erroneously blocked for sockpuppetry despite having no connection to the blocked account or any mention in its SPI

Decline reason:

I don't see any indication this account is blocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Birgit Maass. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Check draft

Hi, can you look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Gulgreenslade/sandbox. Gulgreenslade (talk) 16:33, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, LGB Alliance

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, LGB Alliance. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Draft:LGB Alliance. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Draft:LGB Alliance. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at [[Talk:Draft:LGB Alliance|the article's talk page]].

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Elizium23 (talk) 20:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of LGB Alliance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LGB Alliance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LGB Alliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Elizium23 (talk) 20:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welsh Women Rugby union articles

Hi there, I have moved your recent creation on Wales Women international rugby union players to draft space as they all currently fail WP:GNG at the moment and need more sourcing to show they pass GNG. They all fail WP:NRU as Wales Women haven't played in a World Cup semi-final since 1994 and only players that have played at that level or above are deemed notable under the guidelines. Many thanks. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 12:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rugbyfan22, I read "A women's national team" in the institutional sense. i.e Wales as a nation have competed at a high level regardless of current performance so being in the Wales squad for a major international competition would confer notability. The criteria feel very narrow by comparison with the men's game.

Are we limiting women's rugby notability to those that actually played in a semi-final and later games, or were in the squad for the competition but may not have played in the last two/three games? Battleofalma (talk) 14:15, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of women's notability theres an expanded section here. To pass NRU a women's international would have had to played in the semi-finals or the final of a World Cup (or in an Olympic or Commonwealth Games Sevens tournament), so not just being in the squad. Obviously if they can be shown to pass GNG then they're also notable, and some of them may well do. A number of current England Women's players recently created passed as they had enough sourcing to pass GNG. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 15:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/1985 MOVE bombing at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 19:14, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Niamh Terry

Hello, Battleofalma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Niamh Terry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.