Jump to content

User talk:98Tigerius

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user helped "List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023)" become a featured list on May 17, 2023.
This user has autoconfirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has autopatrolled rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user uses RedWarn for the quickest vandalism reverts in the west (yee-haw!)
This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2.98.155.255 (talk) at 12:54, 4 August 2024 (→‎Greeting: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Committed identity: c95a739811fb004d63ac532409a62fe88d1b488ecd2ee6761396a60b590c81b0ba0b96c5eb0b9d2232bd45c418630dc425d48ffdb8067d83b9aacf367706384e is a SHA-256 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi 98Tigerius, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 09:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023)

Congratulations, 98Tigerius! The list you nominated, List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

mip

Hey, i never saw it done anywhere and don't see the benefit of doing so. Time is given and people can see if it is going on. Kante4 (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check the pdf i added for the combined ranking, it's a different one. Kante4 (talk) 21:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alright I reverted it back. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 21:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversions of my edits

Judging by your edit summaries, it seems that you objected to my edits solely because they had no edit summaries. Am I understanding that correctly? If so, then please consult WP:Reverting and WP:Revert only when necessary; specifically, the former states "Do not revert an otherwise good edit solely because an editor used a poor edit summary...", and the latter states "Do not revert an edit as a means of showing your disapproval of the edit summary." If you disagreed with the edits themselves, then please consult WP:SDNONE, which provides Alpine skiing at the 1960 Winter Olympics – Men's downhill as an article which merits the short description "none". — LucasBrown 22:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SDNONE stated "..but some article titles are sufficiently detailed that an additional short description would not be helpful, e.g., Alpine skiing at the 1960 Winter Olympics – Men's downhill."
I bolded the words "would not be helpful" so I guess you're the one who don't understand what SDNONE means and the provided article link don't have a sd. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 22:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That article does in fact have a short description: the very first line of the source is "{{Short description|none}}". The very next sentence of WP:SDNONE after the one you quoted is "In those cases, {{Short description|none}} should be used to add the article to Category:Articles with short description." — LucasBrown 22:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for the confusion I'm restoring now your revisions. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 04:03, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Uinyeo Dae Jang Geum

Hello, 98Tigerius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Uinyeo Dae Jang Geum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Netflix original programming

I already explained to you why I moved the reference – I moved it to the later premiere date to avoid broken references in the future when they are deleted when the show premieres. Why did you revert my edit again? – Nisf (talk) 12:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing broken in the reference and as you've said it can be moved to the later date when second season premieres. And as what I put in my first revert summary – WP:AINT 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 13:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greeting

Hi there I just wanted to say I’m a big admirer of your work on here and thought I might take the opportunity to express my being a fan of your work and wanted to ask u something 2.98.155.255 (talk) 10:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's interesting of you, but what do you want to ask? 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 10:50, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Say if there was a dispute over an actor being in a show would IMDb be good for proving someone was in a show once the show was out or would credits be better for prove sorry odd question 2.98.155.255 (talk) 12:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:98Tigerius&oldid=1238543809"