Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sumanuil (talk | contribs) at 08:48, 16 July 2024 (→‎Ramesh Narayan: Requesting semi-protection of Ramesh Narayan.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Reason: There is persistent edit warring over the page right now with me and another user. -- While looking for other suitable things to do beside edit war over the page now I'm trying to look at other options I should've done from the start -- such as RFPP. Seeking to have page protected until this can conclude. Noorullah (talk) 02:58, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Not gonna give a straight no here, but will advice you two to seek a third opinion, and that page protection is not necessary or now. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:44, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:58, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ECP they're obvious.197.2.26.194 (talk) 09:18, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Protected only four of the aforementioned articles, focusing on those which saw disruptive edits by non-EC accounts. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:54, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Adding another response for the bot. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:23, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extended confirmed protect it, per general sanctions of U. S. politics past 1992, because he is Trump’s running mate. Semi protection isn’t enough. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 19:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I'm sure the article will eventually need to be ECP in the future, as we close in the election, but I don't see the need right now. Since I initially semi-protected it, I'll let another administrator respond to this request. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:45, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok 24.115.255.37 (talk) 22:27, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I agree with Isabelle Belato. If the level of disruption significantly increases, someone can make a new request and we will reevaluate whether it's needed. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:15, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Seeking temporary protection as a result of IP Vandalism WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 04:02, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:22, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated false edit on the cast table by an IP. IronMaximus (talk) 08:04, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently he did something unseemly, and now a bunch of IPs have got it into their heads that vandalizing this article will have some effect in regards to that. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 08:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]