Talk:Hypericum minutum/GA1
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Fritzmann2002 (talk · contribs) 01:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 13:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
This looks an interesting article and, on a cursory glance, it looks as it is is close to meeting the Good Article criteria. I will start a review shortly. simongraham (talk) 13:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Simon, as a note I will be travelling this weekend but should have plenty of time to respond to any fixes on Monday at the latest. Fritzmann (message me) 14:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the note, Fritzmann. I hope you have safe travels. I will start with some general comments.
Comments
- Overall, the standard of the article is high.
- It is of short, but adequate length, with 956 words of readable prose.
- The lead is reasonable given the length of the article at 120 words.
- Authorship is 98,2% from the nominator.
- It is currently assessed as a B class article.
Assessment
The six good article criteria:
- It is reasonable well written.
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
- Suggest some of the terms are quite advanced and may not be understandable to a general reader. For example, "specific epithet" could be replaced by "name of the species" and maybe explain what vittae are in the first instance.
- The phrase "The leaf is a wide oval shape to almost circular" could be reworded to become more clear. How about "The leaf is a wide oval that is nearly a circle".
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
