Talk:Rumford Medal

This list is a current featured list candidate. A featured list should exemplify Wikipedia's very best work, and is therefore expected to meet several criteria.
Please feel free to leave comments.
After the list has been promoted or archived, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{Article history}} template when the FLC closes.

Rumford Medal (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 27 June 2024 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Rumford Medal is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 10, 2009	Featured list candidate	Promoted
March 21, 2022	Featured list removal candidate	Demoted

Current status: Former featured list

"No Award"

What is the purpose of having rows with "No Award" in them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rfwebster (talk • contribs) 19:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rayleigh

The 1920 award was given not to John Strutt (3rd Baron Rayleigh) who died in 1919, but to his son, Robert Strutt (4th Baron Rayleigh). This can be proved by his biography (see page 505). --80.94.164.195 (talk) 12:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct, I've changed it in the article. Despite being a featured list I don't think enough research was done here. Hence when the RS society stated that it was Baron Rayleigh that received the award, no attempt was made to find out which it was. Benea (talk) 15:18, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fresnel

Quite a lot of sources, some of them quite reputable, give the year of Fresnel's award as 1827, shortly before his death. Some even specifiy the month before his death. Some other sources, including the RS itself, have the award in 1824. This would fit with the tradition of the award made every other year, since even with years with no awards, 1827 would be out of sequence. This discrepancy is unusual. Given that there is so little information on the background of the award, which might cast some light on the history of this, I'm surprised to see this is a featured article/list. The majority seems to come from the RS website, which is no doubt reputable. But with the statement 'The Rumford Medal is awarded biennially (in even years)', can we safely extrapolate and say that this was always the case? Benea (talk) 17:47, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Rumford Medal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]