Jump to content

User talk:Salfanto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Serial Number 54129 (talk | contribs) at 10:11, 20 April 2024 (→Introduction to contentious topics: ib ds alert). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tsing Dao Submachine Gun (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:GNG, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 02:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Salfanto! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Loafiewa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Type 100 submachine gun, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 20:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I just had trouble citing my source. If your wondering my source is this: Jowett, Philip S. (2002). Japanese Army 1931-1945, Part 1. Men-at-Arms. 362. Osprey Publishing. p. 40. ISBN 1-84176-353-5. Salfanto (talk) 13:34, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to North African campaign, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Note: Additionally, before editing articles, please confine any test editing to your sandbox. Thank you - wolf 20:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for the tips Salfanto (talk) 21:31, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tsing Dao Submachine Gun

Information icon Hello, Salfanto. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tsing Dao Submachine Gun, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tsing Dao Submachine Gun

Hello, Salfanto. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tsing Dao Submachine Gun".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Prolog (talk) 20:51, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Russo-Ukrainian war. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please note that only extended-confirmed users are allowed to make edits related to the Russo-Ukrainian War (WP:GS/RUSUKR). Additionally, your source failed verification. Sources need to directly support the content being added. Prolog (talk) 20:51, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at OTs-12 Tiss, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 17:14, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's just an appearance in a video game. Would I have to cite the game's website? Salfanto (talk) 17:23, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As per MOS:POPCULT, you would have to cite a reliable secondary source. Loafiewa (talk) 17:26, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ok Salfanto (talk) 17:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can I cite a video of gameplay for OTS-12? Salfanto (talk) 17:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That would be an example of a primary source. Loafiewa (talk) 17:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I'll add a source for the owen gun in german hands also known as the Maschinenpistole 752(e). Does this one work?
https://www.axishistory.com/various/138equipment/equipment/4257-fremden-geraet-captured-small-arms Salfanto (talk) 23:45, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
again sorry for not citing right away Salfanto (talk) 23:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not really sure why you'd say that, seeing as you just made a string of unsourced edits. Verifiability is a core content policy - if you are going to add content, it is expected that you also add reliable sources to corroborate it. Loafiewa (talk) 20:14, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ok 👍 Salfanto (talk) 21:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

7th Battalion Arei

Hello, 7th Battalion Arei is part of the 253rd Defense Battalion of the 129th Brigade. Its not a separate unit. It was before it joined with the brigade. They use the term battalion, but its strength is unknown. It also makes it strange to have a battalion within a battalion. Most likely they have more freedom, but are administratively attached to 253rd. Your addition to the article should be worded better a little to avoid confusion. Thank you for adding references and improving article. Ceriy (talk) 15:52, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! I'll fix up my article to improve it. Any suggestions on how to improve it? Salfanto (talk) 17:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Neskuchne for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Neskuchne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Neskuchne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 12:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

anything i can do to prevent the article from being deleted? Salfanto (talk) 13:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Type 26 revolver has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Loafiewa (talk) 16:07, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sorry Salfanto (talk) 16:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Combat Vehicle 90. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. No mention of Russia being an evaluation user in WP:RS. TylerBurden (talk) 21:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from War crimes in the Russian invasion of Ukraine into Georgian Legion (Ukraine). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:04, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Ill be sure to do that with future edits that require copying Salfanto (talk) 00:48, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

25th CAA large emblem

Is the current image with empty shield a placeholder? Thanks, RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 17:22, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No its the actual current emblem. I got it from the website globalsecurity.org and it's a reliable source for military matters Salfanto (talk) 18:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The consensus at WP:GLOBALSECURITY is that it is not reliable. How do you know their image wasn’t a placeholder? Reverting. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 19:07, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Great emblem of the 25th Combined Arms Army.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Great emblem of the 25th Combined Arms Army.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to War crimes in the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Prolog (talk) 12:53, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at M1 carbine. You have been told about the verifiability policy plenty of times now. Continuing to add unsourced claims, conjecture, and OR as you have done at this point can only be viewed as disruption. Loafiewa (talk) 17:45, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The line "On 26 October 1944, in response to the Germans' widespread use of automatic weapons, especially the Sturmgewehr 44 assault rifle, the select-fire M2 carbine was introduced, along with a new 30-round magazine." is taken from the "Selective-fire version" on the M1 carbine article which someone else had added. I added it to the M2 section to try and help give context. I hope that clears things up Salfanto (talk) 17:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not really, verifiability is not conditional, see WP:BURDEN. Loafiewa (talk) 21:28, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Perry High School shooting, you may be blocked from editing. ––FormalDude (talk) 23:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Tokmak

Why did you put this article in here, when according to the Afd Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Tokmak the battle didn't take place? scope_creepTalk 18:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sorry I didnt see that Salfanto (talk) 19:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Ukrainian officials dismissed during the 2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Ukrainian officials dismissed during the 2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ukrainian officials dismissed during the 2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 11:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2nd Light Mechanized Division (France), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as ETVS submachine gun. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 16:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for the persistent addition of unsourced content. This addition is especially egregious, since the edit summary reads added sources, yet no sources (WP:RS) were added whatsoever. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  El_C 01:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glory to the Heroes (video game) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Glory to the Heroes (video game). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~ A412 talk! 08:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'll add more sources and then submit the draft for review Salfanto (talk) 11:46, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just submitted the draft for review. It has a total of 24 sources Salfanto (talk) 00:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glory to the Heroes (video game) (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Scope creep were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Article is a mess and is unfit to be reviewed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
scope_creepTalk 00:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Salfanto. Thank you for your work on Eagle 7 (tank). Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The tank battle is already covered in some detail in Battle of Cologne (1945)#Battle, which raises the question of whether a merge there might help to consolidate the material. That might be better for readers, although I agree that the belated award of the Bronze Star to the crew might read awkwardly there.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 22:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the Eagle 7 article could have more information on the crew. Also an image of the tank would greatly help Salfanto (talk) 16:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andriy Nikolaychuk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andriy Nikolaychuk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andriy Nikolaychuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  01:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emblem of the Polish volunteer corps.webp

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emblem of the Polish volunteer corps.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DAILYKOS

Hi!

You may not be aware that there’s a global consensus that Daily Kos should generally be avoided as a source, especially for controversial political topics where better sources are available. As an activism blog that publishes user-generated content with a progressive point of view, many editors consider Daily Kos to inappropriately blur news reporting and opinion.

Regardless, please don’t add it to CTOP articles as you did here and especially don’t mark it as minor.

Cheers, RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 09:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glory to the Heroes (video game) (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Skyshifter were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
All sources are either primary or aren't reliable/are of unknown reliability. Article lacks reliable sources with significant coverage.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Skyshiftertalk 13:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of the Tendra Spit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of the Tendra Spit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Tendra Spit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Super Ψ Dro 00:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is that article being nominated for deletion? Salfanto (talk) 02:10, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Skadovsk polling center bombing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skadovsk polling center bombing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skadovsk polling center bombing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Super Ψ Dro 00:47, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Niche Gamer moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Niche Gamer. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 5th Kresowa Infantry Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian Campaign.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glory to the Heroes (video game) (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
This submission appears to be taken from https://indiecup.net/ukraine/participants/glory-to-the-heroes/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. —Sirdog (talk) 08:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tsar (tank) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tsar (tank) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsar (tank) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Loafiewa (talk) 00:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glory to the Heroes (video game) (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NegativeMP1 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This game unfortunately does not appear to meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines, with the reliability of sources in use here being questionable. I do, however, see a decent chance this game becomes notable later on, likely on release. But that's not now. I recommend taking a look at WP:VG/S for a list of reliable sources, plus WP:RSP for reliable sources in general.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
λ NegativeMP1 14:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPathtalk 06:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox alert

Information icon You have recently made edits related to discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. This is a standard message to inform you that discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. ——Serial Number 54129 10:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Cinderella157 (talk) 03:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Salfanto&oldid=1219869701"