Jump to content

Talk:Jacinda Ardern

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HiLo48 (talk | contribs) at 02:19, 16 March 2024 (Biased article, reads like propaganda: Sources?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former good articleJacinda Ardern was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 1, 2021Good article nomineeListed
May 4, 2021Good article reassessmentDelisted
In the newsNews items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on October 20, 2017, October 17, 2020, and January 20, 2023.
Current status: Delisted good article

Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2023

change "per cent" to "percent" 2806:2F0:5140:16C:58AF:4F8C:5714:22B6 (talk) 23:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Either "per cent" or "percent" can be used depending on the national variety of English, according to MOS:PERCENT. Although New Zealanders understand and use both forms, "per cent" is the form used by the Heinemann New Zealand Dictionary (1979 edition).-gadfium 00:42, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biased article, reads like propaganda

The article is not neutral or unbiased and reads like propaganda in favour of Ardern. I don't think it shows how unpopular she was and how many of her policies were heavily disliked domestically. 152.37.85.94 (talk) 02:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide reliable sources to support your claim? HiLo48 (talk) 02:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]