User talk:Yoshi24517

This is Yoshi24517's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11: 7 days

Yoshi24517 is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

Please note: I live on the West Coast of the United States. I may not see your message due to time zones. In which case, I will respond as soon as I can. Thanks!
Current time at my location: 3:02 am, September 14, 2024 PDT [refresh]

Please remember to stay civil when contacting me, otherwise your message may be ignored and reverted. As a gentle reminder to experienced editors contacting me, please remember WP:DTTR. I know about the opposite part of this essay, but as such, I prefer to not be templated. Thanks.

If you came here because I reverted your unsourced change, please cite your sources in the page or article you edited, bringing them here doesn't help very much.
Please place new messages at the bottom of the page. To start a new section, click the New section/Add topic button at the top of the page.

All sections are automatically archived by a bot (Lowercase sigmabot III) automatically after 7 days of inactivity.

Current Status: Very Busy
-Status updated as of Saturday, September 14, 2024 at 10:02 UTC.

60s

Please mind your language. I believe it is not wrong at all at what I did. In fact, if I had my way, I would reedit all the years. You guys say 1001-2000 is the 2nd millennium and 1901-2000 is the 20th century. Then why do we need to make things inconsistent by adding a pop-culture created decade in the form of 1960-1969 when it is actually 1961-1970. 136.54.56.86 (talk) 17:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because 1960s is anything that is 196X, hence the 60s. 1970 doesn't belong there, does it? Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your argument is completely based on pop culture hogwash and not at all convincing. When we say 16th century or even 1500s, people still say 1501-1600. 136.54.56.86 (talk) 20:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

a user you have warned

carries on vandalizing: The user name is Helloguyamigos. --2003:6:33AE:3D55:29DC:E859:2ED3:80BF (talk) 06:24, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hey sorry about the Dans Mon Esprit Tout Divague is it ok if i add real info

sorry Hjhgbnuhvbyhbn (talk) 21:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your post on my talkpage:

You wrote that I removed content without adequately explaining why and then explained how to use the edit summary, but I did write something in that summary, I wrote this: "This is in the infobox and completely pointless to have in the lead section" What's inadequate about that? The information removed was just a post code and area code which is completely unnecessary to have in the lead section. That information is also in the side infobox so why duplicate it? 86.8.114.154 (talk) 23:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit that I had reverted did not contain an edit summary. That's all. Sorry to confuse you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 23:19, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Clementchristi (13:13, 9 February 2024)

Hello Why my article is not published. After the publishing only my co - members can help to me add more edits and content. Now when I am searching on google the article is not at there --Clementchristi (talk) 13:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Clementchristi,

After taking a look at your contributions, it seems you created your sandbox page, but did not paste your content there. It seems you put some of it on your user talk page, which is not where that should go, it should go in your sandbox. Upon a closer inspection, it looks like you made edits to a sandbox which is a subpage of your user talk page, which is not where that goes either. The correct sandbox page for you is User:Clementchristi/sandbox. Hope this helps! Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you put this article on Wikipedia.then later I can do edits and add pictures . Thank you.

Because now there is no option to add articles in sandbox Clementchristi (talk) 01:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clementchristi, please do not paste your article here, this is not where it goes. If you are still working on your article, your best bet is to put it in your sandbox, so you can continue working on it. If we were to put it in mainspace, it would most likely get deleted. You should only publish an article to mainspace once it is fully ready. I will attempt to assist in getting everything in the correct spot for you to work on. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 01:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have copy pasted your article text from your user talk page into your sandbox. You should work on your article there instead. I gave it a quick look, and I'm sorry to say, it is no where near ready to be published to article space. It needs references more than anything, and the formatting is a little whack. I would suggest you work on it more before trying to publish it. Hope this helps, and happy editing. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 02:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Clementchristi, I second what Yoshi has said to you above. Please work on the article some more before making any attempts to publish it, and in future, please only work on the article in your sandbox. You also mention that you'd like "co-members" to help you contribute to the article - if you are working as part of a group of colleagues, please take the time to read WP:MEAT and WP:CANVASS. I hope I have been able to assist you - please don't hesitate to ask if you have any further questions. Best, Patient Zero^talk 03:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted?

I've give a source to what I said fa handbook mate Writergg24 (talk) 22:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Community shield what's the wrong in it I've put fa handbook Writergg24 (talk) 22:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC) -Merged sections. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 23:07, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find anything in the source that you provided that explains your changes in content. Also, you did not explain the removal of the part of the lead that references the UEFA. While I can't speak for Yoshi, I would guess that this is the reason why your changes were reverted. GrayStorm^{Talk Contributions} 23:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you may not find it if you didn't read the fa handbook

a former writer wrote super cup based on talksport and clips of matches which kind of source is that @GrayStorm Writergg24 (talk) 15:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I used the source you provided for the handbook, looked at the page you provided, and did not find the definition you described. GrayStorm^{Talk Contributions} 15:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've corrected it now to yoshi page 271 appendix section Writergg24 (talk) 16:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While it does define the community shield as a friendly match, it does not say that is is not recognized as a super cup, and that was also a part of your edits, removing the part where it is recognized as a super cup. GrayStorm^{Talk Contributions} 16:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't recognized as a super cup the source in the article is clips of matches never did the fa say it's super cup or official trophy Writergg24 (talk) 17:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was in the middle of replying, but kept getting edit conflicted. I'm merging your sections. Please stay in one section. You are not providing sources. Just saying "fa handbook page 274" is not a source. Please see WP:REFB on how to cite. In addition, you are deleting content without explaining why, as I've told you a couple of times in edit summaries, and on the warnings I left you on your talk page. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 22:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What you mean not source fa handbook is by the fa itself it stated the definition of friendly trophy in it

G - APPENDICES - page 271

APPENDIX I: DEFINITIONS@Yoshi24517

@ Writergg24 (talk) 15:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zaquezipe edits on Colombia's page

Hi Yoshi, I wanted to bring to your attention user Zaquezipe who insists on editing Colombia's page even though people differ from his standpoint.

He has a thing for overestimating the percentage of minority peoples and claims the country has some sort of prosecution policy going on against them with no actual proof to back up such claims.

Please help us resolve this, I think he might want to create a page where everyone can discuss and share their point of view and not edit as he wishes. Also, I've noticed the ethnic subsection now is too large, the article is not exclusively about Colombia's ethnic breakdown. Thank you. Dougwash (talk) 22:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do, it is a historic fact in all Latin American countries, I am not sure why you want to paint it as if nothing bad is going on within the country. I am just trying to add an estimation based off of numbers within the pages themselves! Zaquezipe (talk) 23:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And in fact, I can provide many cites that support my claim. Zaquezipe (talk) 23:07, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]