Jump to content

Talk:Gu Kailai

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 09:39, 10 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

"Horus L. Kai"

[edit]

Can someone provide a source that she was indeed known by this somewhat strange-sounding name? Colipon+(Talk) 01:28, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wall Street Journal, among others:[1]. Homunculus (duihua) 01:45, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Xinhua is not a reliable source

[edit]

I don't think Xinhua should be cited as a source for a statement that is written as fact. So I'm going to change the text added by Addrigon and BrightStarSky today. Klortho (talk) 02:30, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. I'm not really sure how to handle this issue. In general, per the WP:BLPCRIME, there's no problem stating that someone has admitted to and/or been convicted of a crime. But under the circumstance that there are a lot of unanswered questions in this case, and that the admission may have been elicited in a manner that would not hold up under a more....developed legal system, I think qualifiers are certainly in order here. Homunculus (duihua) 04:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
By this standard, nothing printed in the Washington Post should be admitted, either. Xinhua is at least as reputable as any boot-licking toady US newspaper ... :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.151.231.51 (talk) 07:33, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gu's surname

[edit]

I'm actually curious about why her name would be rendered as "Bo Gu Kailai" - it is probably more absurd as it appears to be. In China (or at least Mainland China), a married women pretty much never switches to her husband's surname upon marriage. Indeed, she was never known as "Bo Gu Kailai" before this incident; Calling her "Bo Gu Kailai" would be about as absurd as, say, calling Michelle Obama "Michelle-Barack Obama". Despite this, no explanations have been given so far. All we have are mere speculations, and I think they should be presented as such. Blodance the Seeker 21:35, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that this is quite unusual. Are you referring to this rendering appearing in the infobox, or in the article body? If the latter, it seems to be contextualized fairly well there. Homunculus (duihua) 01:11, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In the article. I have already changed the wording, just put my rationale here in case someone disagrees. :) Blodance the Seeker 19:15, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Aha, I see. In that case, well done. Should we take the alternate name out of the infobox, or leave it there? On another note, I've had a couple general BLP concerns about this page, and was wondering if you had any thoughts. I mention one of my concerns above — that is, I have a vague sense of unease about declaring Gu a convicted murdered, given that the legal proceedings were...unusual. There remain many unanswered questions, as well as a fair bit of reliably published speculation that she may have been a scapegoat. I've also been unsure of how to handle the (also reliably published, and probably notable) suspicions that the woman who stood trial may have been a stand-in. Wikipedia is generally not a forum for speculation, but there may be a way to address this appropriately, without verging on tabloid narratives. Your thoughts? Homunculus (duihua) 21:52, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say leave the alternate name in. As for your concern - as.. uh.. controversial as the legal proceedings may be, she is still convicted of murder in an official court, so I see no problem in stating that "Gu was convicted of murder" as this is merely a fact. We do need to avoid statements like "Gu is a murderer", though. About the "body double" claim - this is basically claiming that "the woman you thought was Gu, was not actually Gu", and I think it definitely meets the definition of an exceptional claim that requires exceptional sources. And that should be more than Internet rumors and claims from unnamed "experts". As such, I would recommend that it be removed until we can find more reliable sources covering this topic. Blodance the Seeker 07:35, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the body double—I think the recent edits to this section have done a decent job of presenting the issue. It is certainly not our place to assert that the woman who stood trial was not Gu, but we can say that this topic became a subject of speculation, and offer the cited opinions of experts on both sides. The existence of this speculation did received coverage from exceptional sources, among them the BBC, the Atlantic Wire, the Financial Times, etc. I do have a slight concern about the sentence stating that the practice of employing body doubles in common in China, though; this is true, and several sources contextualize the claims this way, but at the same time it seems that it just serves to bias the reader towards a certain conclusion. Homunculus (duihua) 21:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, about the ding zui sentence, as you say the sources also note this phenomenon in this context, so we probably should as well. Probably it helps explain why the Chinese public would even consider the idea that the woman in court was a double in the first place; the idea is sufficiently outlandish that it would likely not otherwise occur to readers. Although I doubt that anyone would think that in this case a double could be used without the authorities knowing of it, which seems to be the point of ding zui in other cases.  Sandstein  22:43, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thanks for weighing in. I'm satisfied that this conforms to WP:BLP if you are. The bigger task ahead on this article would seem to be fleshing out the other aspects of her life, lest we end up with a structural imbalance. This article an excellent source, and I'm sure many more are available now. Homunculus (duihua) 04:24, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mail Scam

[edit]

Warning: The name and a reference to this WP page is currently being used in what is apparently an email scam --80.149.71.210 (talk) 13:51, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gu Kailai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gu Kailai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gu_Kailai&oldid=1205742942"