Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese threat theory

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This could be a violation of WP:NOTESSAY and is worth a discussion. Amigao (talk) 03:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep no sufficient policy-based argument has been made. Buckshot06 (talk) 06:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Politics, Economics, and China. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Article could use some work, but the first few sources cited suggest this is a subject that has broad recognition and thus passes WP:GNG.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Extensive independent, significant coverage from leading media outlets, including Reuters, New York Times, Al Jazeera, The Times, The Times of India, as well as a plethora of primary academic work on the topic. Owen× ☎ 20:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It appears notable, doesn't look bad enough that deletion is the best option. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 00:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This seems to be a WikiEd article so pinging the prof: @Piotrus:. Also seems to be at least partially a translated article from zh. Jumpytoo Talk 05:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is not exclusively a WP:NOTESSAY violation to warrent an AfD 𐩘 Datapass ^{talk ⌇ contribs} 08:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]