Jump to content

Talk:Random-access memory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wtshymanski (talk | contribs) at 17:01, 28 April 2023 (rv v Undid revision 1150350782 by 39.57.33.173 (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconComputing C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconTechnology C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

History of term "RAM"

This article does not answer a couple rather basic questions:

  • When and where and by whom was the term "random access memory" in RAM coined?
  • Why did it stick, even though, as Prof Tanenbaum writes in his book Structured Computer Organization: The memories we have studied so far can all be read and written. Such memories are called RAMs (Random Access Memories), which is a misnomer because all memory chips are randomly accessible, but the term is too well established to get rid of now.

CapnZapp (talk) 16:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another meaning?

I've found a usage where it seems to mean something not matching what I've read in this article. It seems like the following are examples of random access memory as used there:

  • A queue
  • A tape
  • At least two registers that can store arbitrary natural numbers that you can increment and try to decrement, receiving feedback on whether that was successful.

This includes two stacks (which can be used as a tape or as registers), but not one stack. Orisphera2 (talk) 17:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]