User talk:DreamingLady

Welcome!

Hello, DreamingLady, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Just H 18:56, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it cool, keep it fresh

Hi DreamingLady,

I've noticed in (some of) your latest edits there seems to be a bit of a frustration boiling up. Though I can wholeheartedly understand the frustration that Wiki-ing sometimes brings with it, I find it best to stay cool. It's taken me some time to figure it out, yet I gladly pass it on as advice.

Feel free to let me know if you've got any comments ;-)

Happy editting

JackSparrow Ninja 22:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I'm new to wikipedia, so I'm not sure if this is the way to talk to other users. Nevertheless, you'll probably see it anyway. :) Actually, it's not like I'm angry or anything, I just wished people wouldn't act so fanboyish. I mean, "Ralis looks like Komali????" Seriously, they are making that up to fit their prefered version of the Rito-Zora thing. But I'm more sarcastic about it than anything else, and I'm sarcastic 24/7. So it doesn't really mean much. one of the only two reasons I joined Wikipedia is to stop this kind of fanboy vandalism. So, yeah, I pretty much can't stand this stuff, but I don't let it get to me even though it appears I do.

BTW. The other reason I joined is to make proper pages for games that deserve it, but don't have a big enough group of fans. At the moment, I'm working on Geist, but I have a bit of trouble with the reception section. Do you have any clue if and where I can find sales charts for not-overhyped games?DreamingLady 23:11, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thar,

I can understand ;-)

I'm glad to hear you're ok. Yet, better to be safe then sorry right? And it can never hurt to say hi to anyone. (when dealing with normal people that is =p)

http://www.vgcharts.org is often good on video game sales, though as they state themselves, they're not flawless. Just keep that in mind.

As for Geist, that's a good one. I wouldn't know one. I'll look for it, though I think it's gonna be a though one and you might not get any further then one early press release, if at all.

Keep me updated on it if you like, and feel free to ask me anything anytime.

Cheers JackSparrow Ninja 23:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geist

Hey DreamingLady,

If you'd like, I can help out with GA'ing Geist. If you could use some help, just tell me what you need me to do.

JackSparrow Ninja 21:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it worth it to mention who did what in creating this game? Some game pages have a Voice Cast section, but I don't get why only the voice actors and the people who already have a big name should be mentioned. Is there a particular reason why no other pages have credits section (some rule on Wikipedia I don't know of?) or is it just a matter of choice and am I free to add it?

It is a matter of choice, and you are more then free to add it. If you want, there is no one stopping you from adding in everyone. The only reason it's not done, is because it's a lot of work.

When is it a good idea to split the character section? Or any section that is practically a list (weapons, enemies, characters, locations).

In the case of Geist, just keep it short. Single game character articles are usually deleted, because WP is not a gamesguide. That's the most important thing to remember too, don't write it as if a games guide.

Is there a criteria for who's opinions (reviews) count and if so, what?

Not a set case of criteria, and if it's a less reviewed game, or there is a very good outstanding one, you can add it, but my advice would be to go by The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess#Reception. Like I said, if there's a real good one, be bold and add it.

Any general advice on good places to find info is nice. Or a place that has audio samples or scanned manuals of games.

Audio samples are dangerous, because of copyright. I'm not sure how those work. Scans the same.

Any idea what kind of sections I could add or which one(s) really need improvement (Reception?)? If not GA status improvement, then what sections would need for FA status improvement.

I'm gonna take a good look at it this weekend, and I'll let you know =)

Sorry for the wait. I've been a bit busy lately.

Hope this helps for now! I'll get back to you soon.

JackSparrow Ninja 04:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pathways Pic

Hey, thanks for getting my pic of Pathways Into Darkness back up where it belongs. I owe you one. White_Bishop 15:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Geist (video game)

The article Geist (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed , see Talk:Article for eventual comments about the article. Good luck in future nominations. Funpika 23:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geist

Sorry. I didn't pay attention at the username, that's why I put "some guy". OK, it was only twice at the GAC, but was in such a short time, and already had a "GA failed" before, that's why I joked.

I put it in the CVG assessment to help, since you were doing a huge effort at the article, and an external view other than the GA people would give some ideas for improvement. And congrats for the approval. igordebraga ≠ 14:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FPA

Isn't the Metroid Prime games listed as first-person adventures? FMF|contact 00:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zelda:TP Gerudo theory

You asked: "You mean the Gerudo Mesa where the portal to Midna's world is located? Think about that before you put that theory back on the page."

Yes I meant that, anything wrong with it? I didn't put it as a fact, but as a theory, just to spark some discussion between people. Since I didn't present it as a fact I have no idea why you decided to delete it... I'm not the first to speculate of such theory, as I researched on some forums beforehand. Explain why it can't be in the page. If things such as speculation aren't allowed in the articles (even though I've seen a lot of them around and not being removed) then forget what I wrote. Thanks. Pedrovsk 14:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Game manuals

Hi DreamingLady,

I found the website I was looking for/thinking of for you, that has game manual scans:
replacementdocs.com or easier to remember:
gamemanuals.net

Hope it helps. And great work on your articles so far :D

cheers JackSparrow Ninja 22:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The CVG Barnstar
		Given to DreamingLady for her amazing work on Lady Sia! --PresN 04:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I looked back at Lady Sia, to see what had happened after I had assessed it, and saw what an amazing job you've been doing there over the last few weeks. You've singlehandedly turned it from a small stub to an almost GA-class article, and if that doesn't deserve a barnstar, I don't know what does. --PresN 04:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool Cookie Award

Congratulations!
You have been awarded the official JackSparrow Ninja's Cool Cookie Award.

Your work on making articles in video games into Good Articles and Featured Articles is very impressive. In just a short time, you have developed yourself amazingly, with great article contributions and vandalism fighting. You are an excellent Wikipedia editor and I am proud to edit with you.

JackSparrow Ninja 01:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VGCharts

Make sure you do not use VGCharts as a source, thank you. - A Link to the Past (talk) 16:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Masks from The Legend of Zelda series

An editor has nominated Masks from The Legend of Zelda series, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masks from The Legend of Zelda series and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:PSO-Eps3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:PSO-Eps3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Geist,HC.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Geist,HC.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 21:03, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Geist1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Geist1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geist,Cord.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Geist,Cord.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geist,Monster.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Geist,Monster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:54, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geist,Gigi.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Geist,Gigi.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 19:55, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:LadySia4.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:LadySia4.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:28, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hamtaro-RRbox.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hamtaro-RRbox.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Edge magazine

Unfortunately I never possessed the physical copy, so it was probably that it had a higher resolution version at some point. Right now it doesn't seem like there's any way to confirm that's true unless you can track down the magazine itself somehow.--_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Captain Morgane and the Golden Turtle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DreamingLady. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DreamingLady. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DreamingLady. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DreamingLady. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RFX Interactive for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RFX Interactive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RFX Interactive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lordtobi (✉) 20:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]