Jump to content

Talk:Jacinda Ardern

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tallard (talk | contribs) at 05:40, 2 February 2023 (Lede is way too long: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former good articleJacinda Ardern was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 1, 2021Good article nomineeListed
May 4, 2021Good article reassessmentDelisted
In the newsNews items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on October 20, 2017, October 17, 2020, and January 20, 2023.
Current status: Delisted good article

Template:Vital article

“Monarchs”

Is there a reason the info-box lists “Monarchs” but not “Deputies” or “Governors-General”? Surely it should be consistently in the singular. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jekrox (talkcontribs) 06:33, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it should be consistent, I have had a look on other PM’s wikis and there is a mixture of approaches (some pluralised for multiples, others not), but from a review of the others I think it looks best, requires the least upkeep, and still reads ok to keep it in the singular. Feel free to disagree and/or revert if you can come up with better reasons than mine Cbe46 (talk) 18:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with both editors and their reasons above, and I would add that using plural can give the wrong impression that there were two monarchs on the throne simultaneously during Jacinda Ardern's term of office as PM of NZ. Bcmh (talk) 05:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lede is way too long

This seems to be a trend on Wikipedia lately. Ledes ramble on and on with editorialising. It's a bad look for Wikipedia, honestly, never ending leads make me run away from the page. Tallard (talk) 05:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]