User talk:Athaenara

Athaenara's Talk Page

Thursday

19 September 2024

10:54 UTC

This is a Wikipedia user page.
If you find this page on a site other than Wikipedia you are viewing a mirror site.
The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Athaenara.

Athaenara's bulletin board

DID YOU KNOW?

Yuan Shikai dollar

... that the Republic of China produced coins featuring emperor Yuan Shikai (pictured) for decades after his demise?
... that although Armond Seidler invented the pugil stick for military training purposes, it later found use in the television show American Gladiators?
... that two cosmetic companies engaged in a "rose war" with advertising campaigns based around the song "You're More Beautiful Than a Rose" and the film The Rose of Versailles?
... that Fede Vigevani once presented an awards ceremony in which he won an award?
... that the construction of the Jubilee Bridge was featured in the 1982 documentary about the A9 road reconstruction?
... that Olympic judoka Edmilson Pedro is nicknamed Bicho Papão, which means "the bogeyman"?
... that "New York's wealthiest janitor" lived atop the Bergdorf Goodman Building?
... that Henry Charles Swan, a law graduate from Oxford, spent more than 25 years living on a yacht in a stream in New Zealand?
... that in her song "Slim Pickins", Sabrina Carpenter supposedly settles for someone who does not know the difference between "their", "there", and "they are"?

TIP OF THE DAY

Tip of the day...

Graphics Lab

Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Resources
Advice Uploading standards Software Tutorials SVG Project map Related projects Wikigraphist abilities News Stale/Archival Research and Development

The Graphics Lab is a project to improve the graphical content of the Wikimedia projects. Requests for image improvements can be added to the workshop pages: Illustrations, Photographs and Maps.

The Graphics Lab helps improve all graphical content stored on Wikimedia Commons and the English Wikipedia. For examples of work done by the Graphics Lab, see the archives of past work. For questions or suggestions, use the talk pages: Talk:Graphics Lab, Talk:Illustrations, Talk:Photographs and Talk:Maps.

Interested in helping out? Check out the uploading standards, then go to one of the workshops you are skilled at, and lend a hand. You can also add your entry to Wikigraphist abilities and yourself to Category:Wikigraphists. You can also add {{User Wikigraphist}} or {{Mbox Wikigraphist}} to your user page.

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

Become a Wikipedia tipster

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd CP}}

CURRENT REQUESTS FOR ADMINSHIP • RfX Report

RfA candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report
Significa liberdade	127	20	7	86	22:18, 21 September 2024	2 days, 11 hours	no	report
RfB candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report

Last updated by ^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} at 10:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ARCHIVES

🇺🇸 Inactive discussions in User talk:Athaenara/Archives are sorted by subject:

Numbered archives	Topics
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16	conflict of interest, spam
3	third opinion project
2	biographies of living persons
1	miscellaneous
0	did you know, signatures, meetups
00	deletions
000	adminship
0000	moving files to the commons

NOTICE: ANY reliable administrator is free to reverse ANY administrative action I have taken, whether page protection, page deletion, user block, or anything else. – Athaenara ✉ 20:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Hello Athaenara! It's been a while. I hope you are well and happy. I recently resigned my adminship and was wondering if you could watchlist my userpage and help keep me safe. There are a few banned users who put on their socks and attack my page from time to time. Occasional revdels may be needed. Many thanks! Jehochman ^Talk 21:19, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jeh, it has indeed been awhile. I'm not sure exactly what you're asking, userpage protection, or check your user pages at regular intervals? And what if I drop dead between now and Christmas, or even between now and Valentine's Day, then where will you be? – Athaenara ✉ 15:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You won't disappear. You can just watchlist me, please, and maybe pop in once and a while to say "hello"? I have 500 talk page watchers, so if you're not around, somebody else will be there. You are important, because in my humble opinion, you are the best administrator on Wikipedia. Jehochman ^Talk 16:19, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Holy cow. – Athaenara ✉ 16:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Pages

Hello Athaenara. I am new to Wikipedia and have learned a lot in the past weeks but specially today. I submitted my first article today and even though I read a lot and saw tons of tutorials I still was missing some things that very kindly some more experienced editors have pointed out in the café, my talk page and and admin's talk page. I understand that the book I chose for my article needs more exposure and reviews so I can reference it to outside reliable sources. I was wandering if I could get my work back on my sandbox or any private space so I can rework it, fix mistakes and maybe in the future publish it if it meets the requirements.

On the other hand, I was told that my page and 2 other pages (that I didn't create) were deleted because of conflict of interest. At least that's what they told me. There pages are: Susan Peirce Thompson and Bright Line Eating. I edited these pages (minor) because they had errors and were missing accurate information. example: last names or actualization of info. Apparently, because I edited on those pages and they are related to the book I was writing. I read that I can't work for the company or be close related to the author or the publishing house and I confirm that I am not receiving any type of compensation. I can also confirm that this topic interests me and that I follow the author's work and have read her books, same books that were needed for me to be able to write. I read in the guidelines that writing as a volunteer and NOT writing in a promotional or advertising way is welcome in wikipedia. I believe that everyone that writes about something needs to have interest right? Specially with how hard this was for me and writing as a volunteer haha. Can you please explain why these pages were deleted? I feel bad that because my article was not qualified, pages that are valuable and that have contributions from the community have been deleted. Can you please share with me your thought on this? Thanks so much for your time and help. Marianti21 (talk) 13:57, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They weren't deleted "because of conflict of interest", as you said, but because they were WP:SPAM. Yours was not the only account involved. – Athaenara ✉ 15:46, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain? What does my contributions have to do with other accounts? Thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marianti21 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Probably nothing. It's not about you, it's about the various pages. It occurs to me at times that some new editors have the idea that Wikipedia isn't really an encyclopedia, that the term is some sort of euphemism. It's not. – Athaenara ✉ 18:31, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I have to admit I'm still in learning and therefore confused about if the problem is that books shouldn't be on wikipedia? At the same time, I found a lot of books when I was creating my article. Regarding the article I created and was deleted, the other editors gave me some pointers like the need for more external references or receptions, which I will take in consideration for next time. Any additional feedback is very welcome. Regarding the Susan Peirce Thompson article, I want to ask you to take a look at the notability of this person. She is a two time best selling author (with one of her books translated into 15 languages) and she has a lot of media appearances. I went back to get some of the latest mentions and appearances. I really think that that article is valuable for the encyclopedia and would kindly ask you to reconsider un deleting it. Yesterday she appeared on national television. I think this is notable right? I'm sharing below some links that I believe will reference this person's work and trajectory. Thank you for your help and for taking the time.

https://www.wfla.com/bloom/weight-loss-mindset-vs-dieting-rezoom-your-life/ https://thebalancingact.com/bright-line-eating-innovative-solutions-to-weight-loss/ https://slingshot.disney.com/?c=dgN4Mnxxj8g3hzqH345P9fR37qLwSwrrzKdkD89dB2bLhmzH https://thehill.com/changing-america/opinion/588022-its-time-to-call-the-american-obesity-epidemic-what-it-is-an https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWLxkCMAldo https://www.cbsnews.com/live/video/20220105125222-experts-share-tips-for-breaking-sugar-addiction-as-many-begin-wellness-journey-in-2022-doctors-point-to-breaking-unhealthy-eating-habit/?intcid=CNM-00-10abd1h Marianti21 (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FTR, there are comments on these links at User talk:Marianti21#Speedy deletion nomination of The Official Bright Line Eating Cookbook: Weight Loss Made Simple. --bonadea contributions talk 09:51, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pianzaco

Delete Pianzaco

I just noticed you deleted User:Pianzaco (myself)! Can you please undo this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pianzaco (talk • contribs) 21:26, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CSD#U5: you created it as the "WOFAPS Wikipedia Page", which is a misuse of Wikipedia as a web host. – Athaenara ✉ 04:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete EDEALO

Hello, I am trying to understand why the page edealo was deleted although it is a page for a brand that has been there for 5+ years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pianzaco (talk • contribs) 21:23, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was advertising and had also been tagged as copyright violation of an "edealo-com-is-the-answer-for-global-shoppers" webpage. Very obvious WP:SPAM. – Athaenara ✉ 04:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

delete page

Regarding the Draft:Y Lot Foundation, the draft has not been revised according to the guidance of editors, but I pressed the button of (resubmit) wrongly. Therefore, the draft was deleted spreadly. May I resubmit the draft once again and this time I will follow the guideline as commented by the editor earlier. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.92.202.33 (talk) 04:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decora Blind Systems Deleted

Hey, I'm wondering how come Decora Blind Systems was deleted? I'm not sure if you read the article, but it was focused on the history of the company back to 1979, up to the recent investment of £10 million by the Business Growth Fund. It included references to many local newspapers discussing the company's growth, references to the owner's on the Irish Rich List by The Times, Irish politicians praising the business in the BBC, and their recent acquisition of several significant retailers across Europe and Australia. Decora don't offer any online retail, so the article was not created with the intention of advertising. I followed the same format as Hillarys Blinds and Hunter Douglas, should those be removed? Rowan-MMB ✉ 07:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the deletion of "IndieGala"

The original IndieGala page was removed out of lack of references and low content. I researched and remade it in its entirety, by taking inspiration and even adapting other existing pages from the same industry branch, such as HumbleBundle, GreenManGaming etc. some were taken word by word. This page stood up, just like others for years until then. It is an over 10 year old site with a certain reputation already. The updated version contained information about the evolution from a small bundle retailer to an independent publisher/developer, charity contributor and involvement in various controversies, all factually documented by reputable sites and sources. I am not sure in what way can the article be considered Promotional when factual information is presented as well as negative criticism brought, as well as various sources to support it. Unless counting sourcing 10 year or articles that present their first bundle as promotion, of course.

Please advise upon what part constitutes "promotion" in what way can it be improved in order to not go against the rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StevenCojo (talk • contribs) 23:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Athaenara,

Did you mean to also untag this article? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nope! – Athaenara ✉ 04:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Admin's Barnstar
		Thank you for continuing to clear out the spam/self promo userspace drafts I find at Category:Stale userspace drafts. Your help is greatly appreciated. Keep up the great work! :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Agnibaan

Can you please delete page Agnibaan which redirects to Agnikul Cosmos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harshdeep2021 (talk • contribs) 13:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Note: you can tag a self-created page {{db-g7}}. – Athaenara ✉ 13:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harshdeep2021 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to inform

Draft:Reza Ebrahimi is possibly recreated as Draft:RezaEbrahimi(1993) but tone seems neutral enough to not constitute a G11. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The No Spam Barnstar
	If I could give three Barnstars at the same time comprising diligence and the Admin's Barnstar, I would have done so, many thanks for arduous tasks you perform in ensuring articles on mainspace are sincere articles. Celestina007 (talk) 17:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

202-206 East Bay Street

My only concern with deleting that one is that I've seen an editor redirect to similarly formatted article titles from, say, 202–206 East Bay Street, because people aren't likely to type the "–" version of the dash in the search, so the inclusion of the hyphen(?) redirect solves that. Made a bit of sense to me, but I don't think it's a biggie; I don't see many people typing such an address into a Wikipedia search.

Edit: seems a bot has taken care of it now. Seasider53 (talk) 22:46, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sock?

Draft:Shaskvir has been recreated. While looking at the undeletion request at RFU, I saw that you had blocked user:Shaskvir and a couple of socks in Feb 2019. Apart from this draft, the page has been re-created many times at different titles and by multiple SPA users, as "Shaskvir", "Shask Vir", and "Draft:Shashank Saurabh" by user:Shaskvir1, user:Sukesh.ranjan and user:Aryanvir1991. Jay (talk) 14:24, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Chiy article

Hello Athaenara,

I requested the page Paul Chiy to be deleted which you did a few weeks ago -- thank you. I am now recreating the article to a standard which meets Wikipedia's requirements and declaring my conflict of interest. It said to contact you to tell you that I am recreating the article so I am contacting you here to let you know. I'm not sure if I need your approval before continuing, but will wait to hear back from you. Thank you for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJC12345 (talk • contribs) 10:54, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

Sir, can you please help out me, how to make my Article as other's Articles. Joeluwa (talk) 05:22, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Dunkley

Good morning, I need your help please. Yesterday I wanted to revise my article MATT DUNKLEY as the text was written as an essay. Instead of deleting only the text, I deleted by mistake the whole article. Can it please be restored? Thank you very much in advance HNP-MUC (talk) 05:42, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Athaenara ✉ 06:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sobhan Muckherjee

Undeletion of recently published article 'Sobhan Mukherjee'

I would like to state that as the writer, I am just a third person and am not paid by anyone through any means for writing the article. The article has been written by me considering nothing but facts that are true and authentic and respective references were also added. However the article was deleted after it was nominated for speedy deletion. I requested to know the areas having problem and needing revision in the contest to deletion section but wasn't answered and the article was deleted. I request the undeletion of the article and clarification regarding the areas that need revision so that the article can be published. Thank you. Anonymous Atronauch (talk) 19:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would once again request sincerely that the article 'Sobhan Mukherjee' be undeleted because everything written in it was nothing but true and authentic facts without any intention of being biased by me. Furthermore, the search traffic had increased greatly for the search of the article since its publication because there are many individuals who want to know and read the article on Sobhan Mukherjee. If there was any area which seemed promotional, biased or spam and posed a problem towards its publication, it was unintentional and I wish to know the areas so that it could be revised. But I would once again like to kindly request the administrator to undelete and restore the article 'Sobhan Mukherjee.' Also, in reply the above given link with the 'Sobhan Mukherjee' has no article linked to it as can be seen. I sincerely wish the restoration of the article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous Atronauch (talk • contribs) 03:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

William Toner

Hello Anthaenara, unfortunately you deleted my article on William Toner. I will take on board the feedback I received and attempt to re-write this to meet wiki criteria. I would appreciate any feedback and help as I go. Thanks --Lornaword13 (talk) 13:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieval

Dear Athaenara,

Quite some time ago you deleted Template:Bahram Beyzai sidebar. Could you please revive it, so I can update it? It has a very honorable equivalent in the Persian Wikipedia . . . and I believe I can develop it to the point of usefulness.

Thanks,

Mirza gashamsham (talk) 09:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Athaenara! Could you do this for me?Mirza gashamsham (talk) 11:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done, sorry for the delay! – Athaenara ✉ 11:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Now, I'll begin to make it look more like its Wiki-fa equivalent.Mirza gashamsham (talk) 22:29, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Renuar Locaj draft

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because Locaj is a well-known artist in Albania. He is an ambassador for his country and it seems his last work on migration documents the pain and sacrifice of refugees. I believe he should be part of the greatest free encyclopedia in a neutral tone — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiEDDE (talk • contribs) 09:19, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiEDDE: On the contrary, it was very obviously promotional, which is another way of saying what is meant when a page is tagged {{db-g11}} for deletion as "unambiguous advertising or promotion": it was not written in the appropriately neutral encyclopedic tone which Wikipedia policies and guidelines require. – Athaenara ✉ 10:00, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting to make room for moves

Athaenara, when you delete a page to move another page there, you need to make sure that the page you deleted becomes a redirect, rather than creating a bunch of orphan red links all over wikipedia and external links. I've created Garuda Indonesia Flight 542 as the redirect, but if I hadn't had it on my watchlist, this would have been a redlink with links all over the place.

Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:14, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thanks. Generally I avoid that category because it's not always clear how (or when!) somebody else is going to follow up on those pages. – Athaenara ✉ 05:27, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as the admin, you must be the one to make sure the redirect works, since we have no idea when anyone else will see it, and you're the one who knows exactly when it was deleted. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I undeleted the previous revisions so the entire page history will be preserved. – Athaenara ✉ 11:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not assuming good faith in edit summaries

Hi there, just to let you know that your edit summary of "some vandal switched cold and warm air: it's an inversion when warm air, which normally rises, is trapped beneath stagnant cold air, which normally sinks" on Great Smog of London was poor faith, and inaccurate. Checking the article history shows that that error has always been there - right back to the article's inception here from 12:17h 20 September 2009:

"On Thursday 4th December 1952, an anticyclone settled over a windless London causing a temperature inversion with very cold, stagnant air trapped under a layer (or "lid") of warm air."

Whilst your edit was correct, this isn't the first occasion where you've declared your changes to be reverting vandalism when that isn't the case. Fortunately this time it hasn't affected any other editors, but please take more care in both edits and assumptions, thanks. Chaheel Riens (talk) 17:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand "the article's inception" to be the first edit which created the page. That 00:15, 12 August 2003 edit included, "air pollution was trapped by the heavy layer of cold air", which is correct. It was not contradicted until nearly six years later, when an edit timestamped 12:58, 21 June 2009 introduced "cold, stagnant air becoming trapped under a layer (or "lid") of warm air". – Athaenara ✉ 18:40, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies - for some reason The first edit in the article history came up as the one I linked to. Nevertheless - you are avoiding the issue at hand that you made presumptions in your edit summary. Funnily enough, this is what you did last time as well - ignored the reason for contacting you, and fixated on something else to appear blameless. Chaheel Riens (talk) 19:16, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

E-Daakhil

Hi Athaenara. I observe you have deleted this article after I got it restored. This article is of high importance for public and hence relevant. Kindly help me restore it in the interest of public. Thanks. Gardenkur (talk) 04:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Venus Remedies Deletion

Thanks for your deletion of the article I nominated! To me, it was clear that you deleted it using G11, which is evident from the deletion log. However, the creator, BhargavKrishna97, insisted that the article was neutral and informative (which seemed the contrary to me as it was like an advert), and said you invalidly deleted using G8 (however, that is because the page was dependent on the deleted G11 one). I believe those assertions to be incorrect, hence, could you look into this and kindly advise the editor? Many thanks. VickKiang (talk) 08:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@VickKiang: Your tagging was correct, it was an advertisement which the company would have been happy to have on their own homepage and should not be undeleted. – Athaenara ✉ 09:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please share more details on what makes my draft an advertisement. Please, I request you to help me understand why you believe the article would be tagged as an advertisement? BhargavKrishna97 (talk) 09:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Athaenara

I am 100% sure that the nominator, @VickKiang did not take the right decision by nominating my draft of Venus Remedies Limited for deletion under G11. Upon enquiring onto why he came to the specific conclusion that it is an advert or promotional write up, he just mentioned that I have used the word "Innovation". Truthfully there is not even one mention of the word in the main company description, the one he is pointing at is actually the name of few awards which are received by the company. I believe as people, we are no one to change or modify the names of awards which are officially awarded to specific entities.

This shows that editor did not review the article from a neutral mindset and he did not pay attention to various segments or where exactly certain words are placed which may be questionable. As a person who is dedicated towards contributing to the decentralization of Wiki, I strongly believe in incorporating only neutral and independent information onto Wiki space.

I would like to know your thoughts about the same issue. Please understand what I am trying to convey. BhargavKrishna97 (talk) 09:14, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BhargavKrishna97: You're evidently trying to turn this into a brawl with a conscientious, knowledgable, and level-headed Wikipedia editor. That's not the sort of thing that benefits this encyclopedia. I recommend that you stop. – Athaenara ✉ 09:20, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

brawl? @Athaenara with all my respect towards you and @VickKiang, I am just trying to understand what went wrong in the article. I really want to fix it as this is my first article and I have spent a lot of time and efforts into understanding the Wiki guidelines. As a admin, please don't threaten me, I am genuinely expecting more insight about the issue we have here. BhargavKrishna97 (talk) 09:26, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BhargavKrishna97: On the contrary, it is you who need more insight into the goals, policies, and guidelines of this encyclopedia. It is typical of new editors with a financial stake in one topic to go straight to that topic and ignore acquiring the skills and sensibilities Wikipedia editors need. You need to change your tune, and your behavior – Athaenara ✉ 09:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Financial Stake? I am not related to the organization. I am genuinely interested with their progress in the pharmaceutical space in the country. I can tweak the article if you can provide some more details onto what makes it stand undeleted And yes, I meant I myself need more insight about why @VickKiang and you believe that the article is against goals, policies and guidelines of encyclopedia. But I dont think you are ready to help me. I will stop the current thread of conversation with you and @VickKiang

Thank you for your time. BhargavKrishna97 (talk) 09:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please Restore the deleted page Angel Rivera

Hello, Hi Athaenara. I am new to Wikipedia and have really learned a lot today. I submitted my first article today and even though I read a lot and saw tons of tutorials I still missed it, my article was requested that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. As requested I have updated and disclosed the employer as per Wikipedia terms, as previously stated I am a freelancer and I write a lot of different content and articles for clients thanks to you all I have understood that there is a Wikipedia: Paid-contribution disclosure and editors are supposed to update that. Am sorry at first I was afraid and confused about what to tell you but now am confident and ready to learn, stay honest and transparent in all manners. Kindly I will highly appreciate your guidance in all cases I believe your assistance will matter a lot, I just wanted to create a simple article like this one for terry matalas about the person (Angel Rivera) he is a well-known person verified on Twitter with over a million followers has been a politician, an actor and is a fashion enthusiast he also runs a company that provides a safer career upcoming women models in America. please assist in reverting and advise me on the best way on recreating the page to meet the neutral requirements of a Wiki page and removing all promotional content on my page. Will highly appreciate your assistance.

Please can you help out me, with how to make my Article like other's Articles, kindly restore the page, and advise me on where I should do the corrections to meet the neutral standards, I don't need it to be a promotional page I just need it neutral and online really think that that article is valuable for Wikipedia and would kindly ask you to reconsider undeleting it, I will take on board the feedback I received and attempt to re-write this to meet wiki criteria. I would appreciate any feedback and support. Mambablaq.1 (talk) 17:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.verawear.com/staff https://twitter.com/Angelluisr https://ballotpedia.org/Angel_Rivera https://m.imdb.com/name/nm4819843/?ref_=tt_cl_i_5 https://about.me/angelluisrivera — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mambablaq.1 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]