Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Regan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hazard-Bot (talk | contribs) at 17:45, 9 December 2015 (Bot: Removing closed AfD from Category:Relisted AfD debates). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (NPASR) (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (chew) @ 14:14, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Regan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No, not the First Lady. Poorly sourced WP:BLP, relying almost entirely on filmography databases like IMDb which don't count as reliable sourcing for an encyclopedia article, of a person notable primarily as a local television news anchor. The only source that passes muster here is covering her in the context of having taken an acting role in a play after her stint on the news show ended (and she isn't even that actual subject of that source, but is merely mentioned in an article whose main subject is the playwright). And notability is not inherited, so the fact that her father, sister and brother have encyclopedia articles isn't a notability freebie either. As written, this article fails to get her over either WP:JOURNALIST or WP:GNG — which means it's a delete. Bearcat (talk) 06:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. S.G.(GH) ping! 09:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. S.G.(GH) ping! 09:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. S.G.(GH) ping! 09:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 07:59, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 03:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 04:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.