Battle of Salt River: Difference between revisions
→Battle: Willem Steenkamp speculation |
|||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== Battle == |
== Battle == |
||
[[File:Salt River Battle Map.png|thumb|300px|'''1:''' Estimated location of !Uriǁ’aekua village<br/> '''2:''' Estimated death location of Francisco de Almeida and crew <br/> '''3:''' Portuguese fleet<br/>{{legend-line|red solid 2px|Portuguese attack route}}<br/>{{legend-line|purple dashed 2px|Portuguese retreat route}}]] |
[[File:Salt River Battle Map.png|thumb|300px|'''1:''' Estimated location of !Uriǁ’aekua village<br/> '''2:''' Estimated death location of Francisco de Almeida and crew <br/> '''3:''' Portuguese fleet<br/>{{legend-line|red solid 2px|Portuguese attack route}}<br/>{{legend-line|purple dashed 2px|Portuguese retreat route}}]] |
||
Almeida allowed his captains Pedro and Jorge Barreto to return to the village on the morning of 1 March 1510 with a force of around 150 men armed with swords, crossbows and spears and raided the village. The historian [[Willem Steenkamp]] speculates that the !Uriǁ’aekua allowed the Portuguese to advance inland so as to be able to engage with them at close-quarters when they entered the heavily bushed areas more inland.<ref name=":2" /> The Portuguese reached the village which they found deserted except for a few children and cattle<ref name=":2" /> who the Portuguese started abducting and stealing.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref>{{cite book|last1=Johnson|first1=David|url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=q2elBgAAQBAJ|title=Imagining the Cape Colony: History, Literature, and the South African Nation|date=2012|publisher=Edinburgh University Press|isbn=978-0-7486-4308-0|location=Edinburgh|page=11|language=en}}</ref> |
Almeida allowed his captains Pedro and Jorge Barreto to return to the village on the morning of 1 March 1510 with a force of around 150 men armed with swords, crossbows and spears and raided the village. The South African military historian [[Willem Steenkamp]] speculates that the !Uriǁ’aekua allowed the Portuguese to advance inland so as to be able to engage with them at close-quarters when they entered the heavily bushed areas more inland.<ref name=":2" /> The Portuguese reached the village which they found deserted except for a few children and cattle<ref name=":2" /> who the Portuguese started abducting and stealing.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref>{{cite book|last1=Johnson|first1=David|url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=q2elBgAAQBAJ|title=Imagining the Cape Colony: History, Literature, and the South African Nation|date=2012|publisher=Edinburgh University Press|isbn=978-0-7486-4308-0|location=Edinburgh|page=11|language=en}}</ref> |
||
A force of around 170 !Uriǁ’aekua counterattacked with stones, fire-hardened wood tipped spears<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> and poisoned arrows.<ref name=":2" /> The !Uriǁ’aekua also deployed especially trained cattle which would respond to specific whistles and whoops.<ref name=":2" /> When the !Uriǁ’aekua weapons proved ineffective against the Portuguese they used their "cattle as moving shields, hiding behind them, and accurately throwing [[assegai]]s and stones at the Portuguese."<ref name=":0" /> The sudden and controlled (by the !Uriǁ’aekua) close-quarters attack<ref name=":2" /> resulted in a Portuguese rout forcing them to retreat to the beach.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":1" /> |
A force of around 170 !Uriǁ’aekua counterattacked with stones, fire-hardened wood tipped spears<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> and poisoned arrows.<ref name=":2" /> The !Uriǁ’aekua also deployed especially trained cattle which would respond to specific whistles and whoops.<ref name=":2" /> When the !Uriǁ’aekua weapons proved ineffective against the Portuguese they used their "cattle as moving shields, hiding behind them, and accurately throwing [[assegai]]s and stones at the Portuguese."<ref name=":0" /> The sudden and controlled (by the !Uriǁ’aekua) close-quarters attack<ref name=":2" /> resulted in a Portuguese rout forcing them to retreat to the beach.<ref name=":2" /><ref name=":1" /> |
||
Revision as of 08:57, 16 November 2020
| Battle of Salt River | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | |||||||
| |||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||
.svg){kind=small} Portuguese Empire | !Uriǁ’aekua | ||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||
|
Francisco de Almeida † | unknown | ||||||
| Strength | |||||||
| ~150 | ~170 | ||||||
| Casualties and losses | |||||||
| 64 | unknown | ||||||
The Battle of Salt River was a small[1] military engagement between the crew of a Portuguese fleet led by Francisco de Almeida and the indigenous !Uriǁ’aekua ("Goringhaiqua" in Dutch approximate spelling,[2] also known as the Khoina in some sources[1]) Khoikhoi clan. It is notable for being the first military encounter between Europeans and indigenous people in what would later become South Africa. The battle resulted in a massacre of Portuguese forces and a victory for the !Uriǁ’aekua.
Background
After winning the Battle of Diu in the Indian Ocean Almeida sailed for Portugal in December 1509 and reached Table Bay near the Cape of Good Hope, where the Garcia, Belém and Santa Cruz dropped anchor late February 1510, to replenish water. There they encountered the local indigenous people, the !Uriǁ’aekua Khoikhoi clan.[3] After friendly trade with the !Uriǁ’aekua a group of 12 or 13 of the crew members[1] visited their nearby village, situated in modern-day Observatory[4] or Mowbray.[1]
Accounts differ on what happened in the !Uriǁ’aekua village over whether the Portuguese started hostilities by attempting to steal cattle or the !Uriǁ’aekua attempted to steal items from the Portuguese.[1][5] The Portuguese were chased from the village back to their ships whereupon they begged Almeida to take revenge.[5] The Portuguese officers debated at length on whether to take retaliatory action and Almeida eventually agreed to conduct a punitive raid the next morning.[1]
The 16th century Portuguese historian Gaspar Correa blames the Portuguese sailors for starting the altercation in the village and notes that the !Uriǁ’aekua were likely already weary of the Portuguese presence; worrying that they might establish themselves in the area.[5] Almeida admitted before the battle that in his opinion his own men were likely to blame for causing the hostilities.[6]
Battle
2: Estimated death location of Francisco de Almeida and crew
3: Portuguese fleet
Almeida allowed his captains Pedro and Jorge Barreto to return to the village on the morning of 1 March 1510 with a force of around 150 men armed with swords, crossbows and spears and raided the village. The South African military historian Willem Steenkamp speculates that the !Uriǁ’aekua allowed the Portuguese to advance inland so as to be able to engage with them at close-quarters when they entered the heavily bushed areas more inland.[1] The Portuguese reached the village which they found deserted except for a few children and cattle[1] who the Portuguese started abducting and stealing.[5][6][7]
A force of around 170 !Uriǁ’aekua counterattacked with stones, fire-hardened wood tipped spears[5][6] and poisoned arrows.[1] The !Uriǁ’aekua also deployed especially trained cattle which would respond to specific whistles and whoops.[1] When the !Uriǁ’aekua weapons proved ineffective against the Portuguese they used their "cattle as moving shields, hiding behind them, and accurately throwing assegais and stones at the Portuguese."[5] The sudden and controlled (by the !Uriǁ’aekua) close-quarters attack[1] resulted in a Portuguese rout forcing them to retreat to the beach.[1][6]
As the flagship's master Diogo d'Unhos moved the landing boats to a watering point further up the beach, the Portuguese were left without a retreat. The !Uriǁ’aekua sensed the opportunity for an attack, during which Almeida and 64 of his men perished, including 11 of his captains.[8] A number of the Portuguese combatants caught on the beach managed to survive the battle by retreating further up the beach to the landing boats at the watering points. Almeida's body was recovered the same afternoon and buried on the shore in what is today a part of Salt River, Cape Town.[8]
Plot theory
The South African archivist, Nicolaas Vergunst, suggested in a 2011 book that de Almeida was the victim of a plot by his own men, who intentionally cut off his retreat after the planned provocation of the !Uriǁ’aekua.[9]
Impact
The loss was a notable military embarrassment for the Portuguese and led to stricter enforcement of an earlier policy of theirs not to land ships in the region. It also earned the Khoikhoi clans of the region a reputation for ferocity amoungst European nations. The Portuguese directive not to land ships in the region put them at a long term disadvantage with the Dutch, English, and French when competing for trade and influence in the Indian Ocean; as they were still free to land on the cost for replenishment.[1]
The battle has been sporadically used as a parable by a number of writers since the 1500s to reflect on moral or political anxieties of their times. Contemporary Portuguese writers such as Correa, João de Barros and Luís de Camões as well as later British writers (such as Thomas Herbert and William Julius Mickle)[5] use the battle to reflect on the "tensions and synergies between military conquest and commercial pursuit."[10] In recent times South African President Thabo Mbeki has portrayed the battle to reflect on what he viewed as the “first moment of black anti-colonial struggle”.[5]
References
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Steenkamp, Willem (2012). Assegais, Drums & Dragoons: A Military And Social History Of The Cape. Cape Town: Jonathan Ball Publishers. pp. 2, 3 & 4. ISBN 9781868424795.
- ^ Goodwin, A. J. H. (1952). "Jan van Riebeeck and the Hottentots 1652-1662". The South African Archaeological Bulletin. 7 (25): 2–6. doi:10.2307/3887530. ISSN 0038-1969.
- ^ "Invaders received a lesson in warfare". www.iol.co.za. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
- ^ "Observatory - Steeped in History and Heritage by Patric Mallet | South African History Online". www.sahistory.org.za. Retrieved 13 November 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Johnson, David (1 March 2009). "Remembering the Khoikhoi victory over Dom Francisco Almeida at the Cape in 1510". Postcolonial Studies. 12 (1): 107–130. doi:10.1080/13688790802657427. ISSN 1368-8790.
- ^ a b c d "Khoikhoi warriors defeat Portuguese thieves". www.sahistory.org.za. South African History Online. Retrieved 10 November 2020.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Johnson, David (2012). Imagining the Cape Colony: History, Literature, and the South African Nation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-7486-4308-0.
- ^ a b Vergunst, Nicolaas. Knot of Stone: the day that changed South Africa's history: http://www.knotofstone.com/2012/03/murder-memory-and-bones
- ^ "5. First encounters, lasting legacies—part two". Retrieved 8 March 2019.
- ^ Ulrich, Nicole (1 August 2013). "Imagining the Cape colony: History, literature, and the South African nation". Scrutiny2. 18 (2): 85–89. doi:10.1080/18125441.2013.828416. ISSN 1812-5441.
33°55′36.5″S 18°28′19.6″E / 33.926806°S 18.472111°E
