Gunnar Bergby: Difference between revisions
Joridgsand (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Joridgsand (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
===Membership on the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women=== |
===Membership on the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women=== |
||
In 2016 the Norwegian government nominated him as a member of the [[Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women]], a UN body of experts on discrimination against women, and he was subsequently elected to this committee. His nomination was controversial because all the women's rights organizations in the Nordic countries had nominated [[Anne Hellum]], the Director of the Institute of Women's Law at the University of Oslo, and because Bergby was regarded as being far less qualified than Hellum, having no academic publications in this field despite this being one of the key criteria. The nomination was criticized by several jurists and other experts on gender equality in Norway, among them [[Hege Skjeie]], [[Inga Bostad]], [[Helga Hernes]], Cecilia Bailliet, Ingunn Ikdahl, Vibeke Blaker Strand and Aslak Syse, as discriminatory towards women. Bergby was the third man in a row from the Nordic countries nominated to this committee, while no women from the Nordic countries had been nominated since the 1990s; the women's rights NGOs in Norway were told by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs that they refused to nominate women as a matter of principle because they wanted a man, the third in a row.<ref name="Bailliet">{{cite news |last=Bailliet |first=Cecilia |date=15 March 2016|title=A Call for Transparency in Nominations to International Committees and Tribunals |url=https://ilg2.org/2016/03/15/a-call-for-transparency-in-nominations-to-international-committees-and-tribunals/|work=Voices on international law, policy, practice|location= |access-date= }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Skjeie |first=Hege|author-link=Hege Skjeie|last2=Hernes|first2=Helga|author-link2=Helga Hernes|date=2 April 2016|title=Ikke til å tro |url=http://kvinnesak.no/2016/04/ikke-til-a-tro/|work=[[Dagens Næringsliv]] |location= |access-date= }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last= |first= |date=31 March 2016|title=Forbigår den beste: Driver Utenriksdepartementet (UD) radikal kjønnskvotering av menn – som er forbudt i arbeidslivet? |url= |
In 2016 the Norwegian government nominated him as a member of the [[Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women]], a UN body of experts on discrimination against women, and he was subsequently elected to this committee. His nomination was controversial because all the women's rights organizations in the Nordic countries had nominated [[Anne Hellum]], the Director of the Institute of Women's Law at the University of Oslo, and because Bergby was regarded as being far less qualified than Hellum, having no academic publications in this field despite this being one of the key criteria. The nomination was criticized by several jurists and other experts on gender equality in Norway, among them [[Hege Skjeie]], [[Inga Bostad]], [[Helga Hernes]], Cecilia Bailliet, Ingunn Ikdahl, Vibeke Blaker Strand and Aslak Syse, as discriminatory towards women. Bergby was the third man in a row from the Nordic countries nominated to this committee, while no women from the Nordic countries had been nominated since the 1990s; the women's rights NGOs in Norway were told by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs that they refused to nominate women as a matter of principle because they wanted a man, the third in a row.<ref name="Bailliet">{{cite news |last=Bailliet |first=Cecilia |date=15 March 2016|title=A Call for Transparency in Nominations to International Committees and Tribunals |url=https://ilg2.org/2016/03/15/a-call-for-transparency-in-nominations-to-international-committees-and-tribunals/|work=Voices on international law, policy, practice|location= |access-date= }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Skjeie |first=Hege|author-link=Hege Skjeie|last2=Hernes|first2=Helga|author-link2=Helga Hernes|date=2 April 2016|title=Ikke til å tro |url=http://kvinnesak.no/2016/04/ikke-til-a-tro/|work=[[Dagens Næringsliv]] |location= |access-date= }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last= |first= |date=31 March 2016|title=Forbigår den beste: Driver Utenriksdepartementet (UD) radikal kjønnskvotering av menn – som er forbudt i arbeidslivet? |url=https://www.dn.no/likestilling/utenriksdepartementet/arbeidsliv/politikk/forbigar-den-beste/1-1-5610809|work=[[Dagens Næringsliv]] |location= |access-date= }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last= |first= |date= |title=Oppnevnte mann til kvinnekomité |url=http://www.advokatbladet.no/2016/03/oppnevnte-mann-til-kvinnekomite/ |work=Advokatbladet |location= |access-date= }}</ref><ref>Hilde Firman Fjellså: "Likestilling: Et liv i kamp: Anne Hellums yrkesliv startet med diskriminering. Det har ikke gitt seg ennå". ''Klassekampen'' 20 May 2016 pp. 32–33 ["En samlet kvinnebevegelse i de nordiske landene ville ha Anne Hellum innstilt til FNs kvinnekomité da det i år var Norges tur til å nominere. Slik gikk det ikke. Beslutningen har vært sterkt kritisert av en rekke ledende fagfolk. Det er stilt spørsmål om Utenriksdepartementets nominasjon av en mindre kvalifisert mann er i tråd med norsk og internasjonalt regelverk som godtar moderat, men ikke radikal kjønnskvotering."]</ref> Law professor at the University of Oslo Cecilia Bailliet stated that the women's rights NGOs in the Nordic countries were "shocked" over the government's nomination of Bergby over a more qualified woman and the Foreign Ministry's use of "radical gender quotas" to promote men to a body concerned with discrimination of women, and that Norway had backtracked on its commitments to gender equality; as a result Bergby was seen as lacking legitimacy as a member of the committee by the women's rights NGOs and experts in the Nordic countries.<ref name="Bailliet" /> |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Revision as of 16:47, 24 June 2020
Gunnar Bergby | |
|---|---|
| Born | August 28, 1947 |
Gunnar Bergby (born 28 August 1947)[1] is a Norwegian retired former civil servant. He was secretary-general of the Supreme Court of Norway; this is not a judicial office and not the head of the supreme court, but the head of human resources and support services.
Career
He was born in Oslo, and graduated with the cand.jur. degree in 1974. In 1975, he worked as a research assistant at Aarhus University, after which he was hired as an administrative officer in the Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communications. He worked in the Norwegian Gender Equality Council from 1977 to 1979 and under the Norwegian Gender Equality Ombud from 1979 to 1986. From 1986 to 1989 he was the town clerk (byskriver) of Oslo, and from 1989 to 1994 he served as stipendiary magistrate (byfogd).[2]
In 1994 he became been the administrative director/secretary-general of the Supreme Court of Norway. In Norway this is neither a judicial office nor the head of the Supreme Court, but corresponds to the head of human resources, ranking below the chief justice and the 19 justices. He retired in 2019; originally it was announced that he would retire two years prior upon reaching the mandatory retirement age.[3]
Membership on the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
In 2016 the Norwegian government nominated him as a member of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, a UN body of experts on discrimination against women, and he was subsequently elected to this committee. His nomination was controversial because all the women's rights organizations in the Nordic countries had nominated Anne Hellum, the Director of the Institute of Women's Law at the University of Oslo, and because Bergby was regarded as being far less qualified than Hellum, having no academic publications in this field despite this being one of the key criteria. The nomination was criticized by several jurists and other experts on gender equality in Norway, among them Hege Skjeie, Inga Bostad, Helga Hernes, Cecilia Bailliet, Ingunn Ikdahl, Vibeke Blaker Strand and Aslak Syse, as discriminatory towards women. Bergby was the third man in a row from the Nordic countries nominated to this committee, while no women from the Nordic countries had been nominated since the 1990s; the women's rights NGOs in Norway were told by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs that they refused to nominate women as a matter of principle because they wanted a man, the third in a row.[4][5][6][7][8] Law professor at the University of Oslo Cecilia Bailliet stated that the women's rights NGOs in the Nordic countries were "shocked" over the government's nomination of Bergby over a more qualified woman and the Foreign Ministry's use of "radical gender quotas" to promote men to a body concerned with discrimination of women, and that Norway had backtracked on its commitments to gender equality; as a result Bergby was seen as lacking legitimacy as a member of the committee by the women's rights NGOs and experts in the Nordic countries.[4]
References
- ^ Gunnar Bergby
- ^ Norwegian National Courts Administration (2 March 2007). "Gunnar Bergby, Direktør" (in Norwegian). Retrieved 12 January 2010.
- ^ Gunnar Bergby går av etter 25 år i Høyesteretts tjeneste
- ^ a b Bailliet, Cecilia (15 March 2016). "A Call for Transparency in Nominations to International Committees and Tribunals". Voices on international law, policy, practice.
- ^ Skjeie, Hege; Hernes, Helga (2 April 2016). "Ikke til å tro". Dagens Næringsliv.
- ^ "Forbigår den beste: Driver Utenriksdepartementet (UD) radikal kjønnskvotering av menn – som er forbudt i arbeidslivet?". Dagens Næringsliv. 31 March 2016.
- ^ "Oppnevnte mann til kvinnekomité". Advokatbladet.
- ^ Hilde Firman Fjellså: "Likestilling: Et liv i kamp: Anne Hellums yrkesliv startet med diskriminering. Det har ikke gitt seg ennå". Klassekampen 20 May 2016 pp. 32–33 ["En samlet kvinnebevegelse i de nordiske landene ville ha Anne Hellum innstilt til FNs kvinnekomité da det i år var Norges tur til å nominere. Slik gikk det ikke. Beslutningen har vært sterkt kritisert av en rekke ledende fagfolk. Det er stilt spørsmål om Utenriksdepartementets nominasjon av en mindre kvalifisert mann er i tråd med norsk og internasjonalt regelverk som godtar moderat, men ikke radikal kjønnskvotering."]