User talk:Mightytotems: Difference between revisions
Mightytotems (talk | contribs) |
→Femine footballers article: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
:: Ok. Just seems odd the article was created in 2016 with numerous contributors. Why'd you select it to nominate for deletion? Do you disagree with WP:GNG? [[User:Hmlarson|Hmlarson]] ([[User talk:Hmlarson|talk]]) 14:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC) |
:: Ok. Just seems odd the article was created in 2016 with numerous contributors. Why'd you select it to nominate for deletion? Do you disagree with WP:GNG? [[User:Hmlarson|Hmlarson]] ([[User talk:Hmlarson|talk]]) 14:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
::: At a quick glance I didn't find any of the sources cited to definitively indicate GNG; they all seem to be about stats or transfers which, in the absence of NFOOTY, do not in and of themselves indicate GNG. I know current NFOOTY criteria disadvantage female footballers but it doesn't seem like the subject played in high enough levels (e.g., youth world cups). But as you said folks have worked on the page and I might've been a bit haste in PROD, so it's probably better to be more inclusive here. [[User:Mightytotems|Mightytotems]] ([[User talk:Mightytotems#top|talk]]) 20:35, 19 March 2020 (UTC) |
::: At a quick glance I didn't find any of the sources cited to definitively indicate GNG; they all seem to be about stats or transfers which, in the absence of NFOOTY, do not in and of themselves indicate GNG. I know current NFOOTY criteria disadvantage female footballers but it doesn't seem like the subject played in high enough levels (e.g., youth world cups). But as you said folks have worked on the page and I might've been a bit haste in PROD, so it's probably better to be more inclusive here. [[User:Mightytotems|Mightytotems]] ([[User talk:Mightytotems#top|talk]]) 20:35, 19 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Femine footballers article == |
|||
Is UWCL appearances enough for a female footballer to get a wiki article? It would be helpful for me to save 3 articles - [[Lèa Khelifi]], [[Lina Boussaha]] and [[Sandy Baltimore]]. |
|||
I have seen many articles on female footballers who have only played league matches in Spain or Italy having wiki pages. Wondering why pages o. France based footballers are getting nominated for deletion all at a sudden! [[User:Kokoeist|Kokoeist]] ([[User talk:Kokoeist|talk]]) 02:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:41, 21 March 2020
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Disambiguation link notification for December 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ljupčo Kmetovski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Anthony Hudson
Hey, I know they say to be bold but for a page that is pretty well established and has had a number of editors that has edited the page, I would suggest discussing before moving the page. If you hadn't changed it back, I probably would have asked for it to be changed. Don't want to be negative it's just a suggestion and I welcome another editor on his page. NZFC(talk)(cont) 07:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: NWSL Players' Awards has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy (talk) 10:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for February 22
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- 2020 Reign FC season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Red Bull Arena
- Orlando Pride (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Amanda Duffy
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:48, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amber Brooks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Reign FC logo.svg
Thank you for uploading File:Reign FC logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Crest of OL Reign.png
Thanks for uploading File:Crest of OL Reign.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
"Factually incorrect information"
What exactly was the factually incorrect information? It went specifically by the sources. ViperSnake151 Talk 14:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- (1) you removed definition of "international" in your first edit; (2) the distribution of matches are for 2020 season only, not for the entire three-year duration; (3) the distribution of matches for 2020 season among the three CBS Sports channels/streams are yet to be finalized and subject to change towards the backend of the season. This info was included in revert edit summaries already. Mightytotems (talk) 14:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Also re: WP:BRD, you went bold, I reverted, then you should initiate discussion. In the future it would be nice not to do BRBRBR a bunch of times in a circle. Mightytotems (talk) 14:42, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Jenna Dear
Thanks for the notification - but a bit confused by the exclusion of WP:GNG in your nomination and nothing else beyond NFOOTY mentioned. Can you clarify? Hmlarson (talk) 14:03, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hi no problem! Just doing some patrolling and went for NFOOTY as the most easily verifiable criterion. If you believe the page currently satisfies WP:GNG, just remove PROD and add appropriate justification in talk (so it doesn't get missed in the future). Mightytotems (talk) 14:09, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ok. Just seems odd the article was created in 2016 with numerous contributors. Why'd you select it to nominate for deletion? Do you disagree with WP:GNG? Hmlarson (talk) 14:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- At a quick glance I didn't find any of the sources cited to definitively indicate GNG; they all seem to be about stats or transfers which, in the absence of NFOOTY, do not in and of themselves indicate GNG. I know current NFOOTY criteria disadvantage female footballers but it doesn't seem like the subject played in high enough levels (e.g., youth world cups). But as you said folks have worked on the page and I might've been a bit haste in PROD, so it's probably better to be more inclusive here. Mightytotems (talk) 20:35, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ok. Just seems odd the article was created in 2016 with numerous contributors. Why'd you select it to nominate for deletion? Do you disagree with WP:GNG? Hmlarson (talk) 14:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Femine footballers article
Is UWCL appearances enough for a female footballer to get a wiki article? It would be helpful for me to save 3 articles - Lèa Khelifi, Lina Boussaha and Sandy Baltimore.
I have seen many articles on female footballers who have only played league matches in Spain or Italy having wiki pages. Wondering why pages o. France based footballers are getting nominated for deletion all at a sudden! Kokoeist (talk) 02:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC)