Talk:Eugene Local Measure 51: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:10, 9 March 2020

I thought the introduction section could use more detail on what Measure 51 is and the difference between measure 51 and no 18080. I thought the article's structure was clear but the categories kind of all blended together with their information. I thought the content covered a lot within the topic but was confusing at times. I am still not really sure hat ended up passing or what was denied. I think a results section specifically saying what happened would be really helpful. (Anjulenabagga (talk) 23:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC)).[reply]

Agreed. Also, the text could use some re-working too. Some parts are overly wordy (for example, "non-majority sexual behavior"). -- Sandbergja (talk) 04:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 23:44, 4 March 2020 edit Anjulenabagga (talk \| contribs) 17 edits ←Created page with 'I thought the introduction section could use more detail on what Measure 51 is and the difference between measure 51 and no 18080. I thought the article's struct...'		Revision as of 04:10, 9 March 2020 edit undo Sandbergja (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,003 edits adding some feedback Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I thought the introduction section could use more detail on what Measure 51 is and the difference between measure 51 and no 18080. I thought the article's structure was clear but the categories kind of all blended together with their information. I thought the content covered a lot within the topic but was confusing at times. I am still not really sure hat ended up passing or what was denied. I think a results section specifically saying what happened would be really helpful. ([[User:Anjulenabagga\|Anjulenabagga]] ([[User talk:Anjulenabagga\|talk]]) 23:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC)).		I thought the introduction section could use more detail on what Measure 51 is and the difference between measure 51 and no 18080. I thought the article's structure was clear but the categories kind of all blended together with their information. I thought the content covered a lot within the topic but was confusing at times. I am still not really sure hat ended up passing or what was denied. I think a results section specifically saying what happened would be really helpful. ([[User:Anjulenabagga\|Anjulenabagga]] ([[User talk:Anjulenabagga\|talk]]) 23:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC)).
			: Agreed. Also, the text could use some re-working too. Some parts are overly wordy (for example, "non-majority sexual behavior"). -- [[User:Sandbergja\|Sandbergja]] ([[User talk:Sandbergja\|talk]]) 04:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)