Jump to content

User talk:AJ2265: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 63: Line 63:
*Use common sense.
*Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see [[Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback]] (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my [[User talk:Tom Morris|talk page]] if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 17:04, 26 April 2018 (UTC)<!-- Template:Rollbackgiven3-->
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see [[Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback]] (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my [[User talk:Tom Morris|talk page]] if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 17:04, 26 April 2018 (UTC)<!-- Template:Rollbackgiven3-->

== [[Chief executive officer]] ==

Hi AJ, I note your reversion at the above article. Things are getting close to edit warring there. A couple of points: the source is not a good one according to [[WP:RS]] (it's a blog with a political agenda). Could you please put arguments on the Talk page as to why you think this stat should prevail. Thanks, [[Special:Contributions/31.52.166.58|31.52.166.58]] ([[User talk:31.52.166.58|talk]]) 18:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:22, 15 November 2018

Welcome!

Hello, AJ2265, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Oxford to Bicester Line. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! samtar {t} 17:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Eva Simone Hayward, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! – Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 20:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi AJ2265. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2018-04-21. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 20:04, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hard to verify IP vandalism

Hi :) Maybe you could help me with this, as you stumbled across one of the edits yourself:

There is more of this, probably reverted by people like you and me. Let's clean the mess up together. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is not about you, but just for your convenience and information: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Hard_to_revert_IP_vandalism ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For helping to clean up a mess of hard to identify, malicious vandalism. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Outing concerns

Hi AJ. As an FYI, you should not ever use an editor's full name, even when it's obvious who the editor is, unless the editor has made it clear who they are on wikipedia itself. Thanks. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info - I've taken a read of WP:PRIVACY. AJ2265 (talk) 10:07, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi AJ2265. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! —Tom Morris (talk) 17:04, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AJ, I note your reversion at the above article. Things are getting close to edit warring there. A couple of points: the source is not a good one according to WP:RS (it's a blog with a political agenda). Could you please put arguments on the Talk page as to why you think this stat should prevail. Thanks, 31.52.166.58 (talk) 18:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]