User talk:Wheelybrook: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:09, 26 October 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome to Wikipedia Wheelybrook.

Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to become a Wikipedian. Here are some useful links to help you get started:

If you need to experiment and improve your editing skills, you can use the sandbox quite safely.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your user name plus a date and timestamp after your message. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page.

Happy editing ....

I have also deleted your userpage and restored the last edit, per your request. -- Cactus.man ✍ 16:00, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

This is a reminder to go vote by June 7 for the
Catholic Collaboration of the Week.
Support or comment on the current nominations, or nominate an article for collaboration.

OpenDocument

Hi, I hope I didn't seem too negative regarding the OpenDocument articles. It looks like you are trying to do some much-needed cleanup, and I appreciate it. Wmahan . 19:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speech acts

Hi Louie, I reformulated the dutch and italian versions. See if you can agree with them now. Cheers! Cat 07:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Reinach's theory cannot be reduced to a simple account of performative social acts. It is quite more sophisticated than that and sucha label would just be misleading. If you examine Reinach's work (or secondary luterature on it) you'll see that in effect his position is on the same level as that of Searle or Austin. So even though he called his a theory of "social acts" and embedded it in a context of law and ethics, it is a full-fledged account of what we now would call "speech acts" Cat 15:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. This is matter of some interest to me; so my request is much more oriented to seeking additional information that it is to commenting on your contribution. It seems that you are responsible for the entry that states that treament of speech acts "may be found in the works of some church fathers and scholastic philosophers" and, also, "in the context of sacramental theology". I am really interested if you are able to provide any primary source "chapter and verse" occasions where this is so; i.e., rather than just an allusion to a broad, unsupported assertion that might have been made elsewhere. Best to you Lindsay658 06:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OpenDocument

Just curious but redirects are cheap, why not just leave them as that? If they are deleted then someone may recreate them as articles because they don't see the proper name. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. Well, leave them, OK! Louie 18:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Catholicism Assessment

Hello, fellow WikiProject Catholicism member. The project has recently begun work on assessing articles relating to Catholicism, and you are invited to comment and participate. The subpage for this assessment is located here. Thank you. —Mi ra 07:24, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church

There is a vote at Talk:Roman Catholic Church: A Vote on the Title of this Article on moving Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church. You are invited to review it. --WikiCats 03:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 :Well, Reinach's theory cannot be reduced to a simple account of performative social acts. It is quite more sophisticated than that and sucha label would just be misleading. If you examine Reinach's work (or secondary luterature on it) you'll see that in effect his position is on the same level as that of Searle or Austin. So even though he called his a theory of "social acts" and embedded it in a context of law and ethics, it is a full-fledged account of what we now would call "speech acts" [[User:Carlo.Ierna|Cat]] 15:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
-::Hi there. This is matter of some interest to me; so my request is much more oriented to seeking additional information that it is to commenting on your contribution. It seeems that you are responsible for the entry that states that treament of speech acts "may be found in the works of some church fathers and scholastic philosophers" and, also, "in the context of sacramental theology". I am really interested if you are able to provide any primary source "chapter and verse" occasions where this is so; i.e., rather than just an allusion to a broad, unsupported assertion that might have been made elsewhere. Best to you [[User:Lindsay658|Lindsay658]] 06:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
+::Hi there. This is matter of some interest to me; so my request is much more oriented to seeking additional information that it is to commenting on your contribution. It seems that you are responsible for the entry that states that treament of speech acts "may be found in the works of some church fathers and scholastic philosophers" and, also, "in the context of sacramental theology". I am really interested if you are able to provide any primary source "chapter and verse" occasions where this is so; i.e., rather than just an allusion to a broad, unsupported assertion that might have been made elsewhere. Best to you [[User:Lindsay658|Lindsay658]] 06:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 ==OpenDocument==