Jump to content

User talk:Alexander Iskandar: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 2,079: Line 2,079:


{{ping|Just Chilling}} I appreciate your great deal of efforts and spending your precious time to mass revert my edits to Malaysian school-related articles. What's to do next after mass revert those articles. I hope you and other editors will collaborate to improve those articles by adding reliable sources, independent third-party sources and do not depends solely on primary sources which is respective school website. [[WP:NOTADVERTISEMENT]] and [[WP:NOTDIRECTORY]]. You and other editors may check page history and communicate with those school-related article creators about how to improve those articles. Our common objective are to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. I hope those articles may have reliable sources and useful to readers when they search about the school in the Google search engine. [[User:Alexander Iskandar|Alexander Iskandar]] ([[User talk:Alexander Iskandar#top|talk]]) 06:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
{{ping|Just Chilling}} I appreciate your great deal of efforts and spending your precious time to mass revert my edits to Malaysian school-related articles. What's to do next after mass revert those articles. I hope you and other editors will collaborate to improve those articles by adding reliable sources, independent third-party sources and do not depends solely on primary sources which is respective school website. [[WP:NOTADVERTISEMENT]] and [[WP:NOTDIRECTORY]]. You and other editors may check page history and communicate with those school-related article creators about how to improve those articles. Our common objective are to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. I hope those articles may have reliable sources and useful to readers when they search about the school in the Google search engine. [[User:Alexander Iskandar|Alexander Iskandar]] ([[User talk:Alexander Iskandar#top|talk]]) 06:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

{{ping|Just Chilling}} You can check page history of articles in the [[:Category:Boys' schools in Malaysia]] and [[:Category:Girls' schools in Malaysia]], I put an effort to add this link [http://www.utusan.com.my/rencana/kecemerlangan-sekolah-satu-gender-1.198650 Kecemerlangan sekolah satu gender] as published in the independent reliable source, Utusan Online (not official website) to verify if those schools are notable single-sex schools. By the way, I see your continuous efforts to revert my undiscussed and controversial mass redirects. I don't recommend those articles lacking reliable sources to be deleted using AfD because I appreciate a great deal of efforts by past creators, editors and volunteers contributing to those articles. However, we cannot let those articles lacking reliable sources and may contained disputed information to be remained as Wikipedia stand-alone article because those articles may be viewed by any readers any time if they searched those schools using search engine including Google. Is it useful for readers to read articles with unverified information and no reliable source to verify those informations? I learnt that at this moment Wikipedia cannot accept draftifying articles and mass-redirect articles to draft namespace is disruptive. I aware that although those articles may be deleted by admins, future editors may appeal to restore those deleted articles and start improving those articles. I understand that either keep or delete, either redirect or delete, either inclusionist or deletionist, but not either delete or draft. I know that my controversial mass redirect issue started since last month, April 2017, although I start editing in Wikipedia two years ago. [[User:Alexander Iskandar|Alexander Iskandar]] ([[User talk:Alexander Iskandar#top|talk]]) 13:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

After checking Special:WhatLinksHere, I found a few articles still being redirected to List of schools in X and I request that it should be reverted to previous edits if possible.
* [[Sekolah Menengah Seg Hwa]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to SMJK Seg Hwa instead)
* [[Chio Min Secondary School]]
* [[Keat Hwa II Secondary School]]
* [[Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Bakar Arang]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to SMK Bakar Arang instead)
* [[Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Tunku Sulong]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to SMK Tunku Sulong instead)
* [[Sin Min Secondary School]]
* [[SMJK Chio Min]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Chio Min Secondary School instead)
* [[Smjk sin min]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Sin Min Secondary School instead)
* [[SMK Ayer Hangat]]
* [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Taman Jelutong]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to SMK Taman Jelutong instead)
* [[Kolej Tuanku Ja'afar]]
* [[Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Seremban 2]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to SMK Seremban 2 instead)
* [[Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Tuanku Abdul Rahman, Negeri Sembilan]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to SMK Tuanku Abdul Rahman instead)
* [[SMK Tuanku Abdul Rahman]]
* [[User:Waleedpak/Sultan Abu Bakar School (SABS), Kuantan]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Sultan Abu Bakar School (SABS), Kuantan instead)
* [[Poi Lam Secondary School]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Sekolah Menengah Poi Lam instead)
* [[San Min National Type Secondary School]]
* [[Sekolah Menengah Poi Lam]]
* [[Sekolah Menengah Poi Lam (SUWA)]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Sekolah Menengah Poi Lam instead)
* [[Smjk san min]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to San Min National Type Secondary School instead)
* [[SMK Seri Perak]]
* [[DoubleCLiCC]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Chung Ling High School instead)
* [[Chung Ling High School Penang]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Chung Ling High School instead)
* [[Chung Ling High School, Penang]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Chung Ling High School instead)
* [[Chung ling college]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Chung Ling High School instead)
* [[SMJK JIT SIN]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to Jit Sin High School instead)
* [[KK High School]]
* [[Majakir Secondary School]]
* [[SMK Majakir Papar]]
* [[Sekolah Menegah Kebangsaan Pengiran Omar]]
* [[Sekolah Menegah Pengiran Omar]]
* [[Sekolah Menegah Sipitang]]
* [[Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Majakir Papar]]
* [[Sekolah Pengiraan Menengah Pengiran Omar]]
* [[SM La Salle, Kota Kinabalu]]
* [[SM St Joseph Papar]]
* [[SM St Mary Papar]]
* [[SMK Agama Kota Kinabalu]]
* [[SMK Agama Tun Ahmadshah]]
* [[SMK Bahang (Penampang)]]
* [[SMK Bahang Penampang]]
* [[SMK Datuk Peter Mojuntin]]
* [[SMK Majakir]]
* [[SMK Majakir Papar]]
* [[SMK St Joseph Papar]]
* [[SMK St Mary Papar]]
* [[SMK St Peter Bundu]]
* [[SMK St Peter Bundu Kuala Penyu, Sabah, Malaysia]]
* [[SMK Takis]]
* [[SMK Takis Papar]]
* [[SMKA Kota Kinabalu]]
* [[St Joseph Secondary School]]
* [[St. Michael's Secondary School (Penampang)]]
* [[STTSS]]
* [[Sung Siew]]
* [[Sungsiew]]
* [[Takis Secondary School]]
* [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SMK Matunggong, Kudat]] (bot fixing double redirect, it should be redirected to SMK Matunggong, Kudat)
* [[Eton of Borneo]]
* [[Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Jalan Arang]]
* [[SMK St. Anthony]]
* [[SMK St. Theresa]]
* [[SMK Sungai Tapang]]
* [[SMK Tun Abdul Razak]]
* [[Catholic High School Football Club]]
* [[Cempaka School]]
* [[Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (C) Yuk Chai]]
* [[Sekolah Menengah Damansara Utama]]
* [[Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Bandar Baru Sultan Suleiman]]
* [[Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Damansara Utama]]
* [[Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Puchong Utama (1)]]
* [[SMK Bandar Utama 3]]
* [[Smk bandar utama 3]]
* [[SMK Taman Desa, Bandar Country Homes,Rawang]]
* [[User:Adrianachew/Cempaka Cheras School]]
* [[User:Cempaka Cheras School]]
* [[Draft:Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Seksyen 3 Bandar Kinrara]]
* [[Draft:Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Agama Al-Irshad]]
* [[Draft:SMK LEMBAH SUBANG PJ]]
* [[Draft:SMK Bandar Utama Damansara 3]]

Below are list of primary schools in Malaysia:
* [[Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina Jalan Davidson]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (C) Han Ming]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (C) Yuk Chai]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (Cina) Chin Hwa]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (T) St. Teresa Convent]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah kebangsaan dato' hashim]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah Kebangsaan Bukit Pantai]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah Kebangsaan Bukit Tiu]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah Kebangsaan Danau Kota]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah Kebangsaan Dato' Hashim]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah Kebangsaan Felda Selasih]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah Kebangsaan Guar Nangka]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah Kebangsaan Perempuan Methodist MGS]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah Kebangsaan Seri Setia]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah Kebangsaan Sungai Binjai]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[Sekolah Kebangsaan Taman Suria]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJKC Damansara]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJKC Han Chiang]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJKC Jalan Davidson]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJKC Khiak Yew]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJKC Yuk Chai]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK(C) Chung Hua 4 1/2]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK(C) Damansara]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK(C) Han Chiang]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK(C) Han Ming]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK(C) Kwang Hwa]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK(C) Pin Hwa 2]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK(C) Taman Connaught]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK(C) Yuk Chai]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK(T) Bandar Mentakab]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK(T) St. Teresa Convent]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK (C) Chung Hua 4 1/2]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK (C) Han Ming]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK (C) Lai Meng]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK (C) Liman]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK (C) Sin Kwang]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK (C) Tenang]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SJK (Tamil) Bandar Mentakab]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SK Bukit Tiu]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SK Dato' Hashim]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SK Kuala Papar]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SK Simpang Lima]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SK Taman Hi-Tech]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[SRJK Liman Kati]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[St Xavier Branch School]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[St Xavier Cawangan]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[St. Xavier Branch School]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[St. Xavier Cawangan]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[St. Xavier Pulau Tikus]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)
* [[St. Xavier's Branch School]] (Primary school is not notable to have Wikipedia stand alone article)


I actually planned to insert [[Template:Under construction]] above all list of schools in Malaysian states. Since I already blocked because of draftifying, nominating speedy deletion without valid criterion, nominating proposed deletion to disputed Malaysian entertainer-related articles and also do not revert all my controversial mass-redirect. I have difficult time to work my plan.


== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 2006 in Malaysia and Singapore]] ==
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 2006 in Malaysia and Singapore]] ==

Revision as of 13:55, 25 May 2017

Alexander Iskandar, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Alexander Iskandar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Results of the 2008 Malaysian general election by parliamentary constituency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibrahim Ali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Members of the Dewan Rakyat, 11th Malaysian Parliament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jasin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Members of the Dewan Rakyat, 13th Malaysian Parliament

Regarding your edits to the Members of the Dewan Rakyat, 13th Malaysian Parliament, it would be better to have the parliamentarians grouped into their respective states, and the senators and speakers listed in a different section.12:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.168.46.79 (talk)

Also your additions of the senators to the Dewan Rakyat are wrong, they should be in the Dewan Negara. Maybe an info box with the speaker. 58.168.96.118 (talk) 17:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Members of the Federal Legislative Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Langat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Members of the Dewan Rakyat, 9th Malaysian Parliament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Subang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Malaysian Indian Congress may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • MIC involved itself in the struggle for the independence of [[Federation of Malaya|Malaya]] (now [[Malaysia]] which was achieved in 1957. It positioned itself for representation on behalf of
  • # [[[[A. Thivy]] (1946 - 1947)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Angkatan Keadilan Insan Malaysia logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Angkatan Keadilan Insan Malaysia logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Barisan Rakyat Sabah Bersekutu logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Barisan Rakyat Sabah Bersekutu logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HAMIM logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HAMIM logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Malaysia United People's Party logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Malaysia United People's Party logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Malaysian Indian United Party logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Malaysian Indian United Party logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SPF logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SPF logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:39, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:State Reform Party logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:State Reform Party logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sabah People's Front

Hello Alexander Iskandar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sabah People's Front for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Danielj2705 (talk) 14:16, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Federated Sabah People's Front

Hello Alexander Iskandar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Federated Sabah People's Front for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Danielj2705 (talk) 14:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Federated Sabah People's Front. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Danielj2705 (talk) 14:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Federated Sabah People's Front

The article Federated Sabah People's Front has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Debatable significance. Author also removed previous speedy deletion tag.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Danielj2705 (talk) 14:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parti Rakyat Sarawak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Vincent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Alexander Iskandar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!  GeorgeLouis (talk) 07:51, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Barisan Rakyat Sabah Bersekutu logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Barisan Rakyat Sabah Bersekutu logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Barisan Rakyat Sabah Bersekutu logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Barisan Rakyat Sabah Bersekutu logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Malaysia United People's Party logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Malaysia United People's Party logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Malaysia United People's Party logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Malaysia United People's Party logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:UPKO logo.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:UPKO logo.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Parti bersatu sabah flag.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Parti bersatu sabah flag.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Sarawak Workers Party logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Sarawak Workers Party logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Parti Demokratik Setiahati Kuasa Rakyat Bersatu Sabah logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Parti Demokratik Setiahati Kuasa Rakyat Bersatu Sabah logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:HAMIM logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:HAMIM logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kongres India Muslim Malaysia logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Kongres India Muslim Malaysia logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Human Rights Party Malaysia logo.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Human Rights Party Malaysia logo.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Parti Ekonomi Rakyat Sarawak Bersatu logo.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Parti Ekonomi Rakyat Sarawak Bersatu logo.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Parti Pekerja-Pekerja Malaysia.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Parti Pekerja-Pekerja Malaysia.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:PartiPunjabiMalaysia.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:PartiPunjabiMalaysia.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:SAPP logo.gif

Thank you for uploading File:SAPP logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:SPF logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:SPF logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:State Reform Party logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:State Reform Party logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Parti Cinta Malaysia logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Parti Cinta Malaysia logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:MMSP-logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:MMSP-logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:MDP logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:MDP logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Malaysian Indian United Party logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Malaysian Indian United Party logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Malaysian Dayak Congress logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Malaysian Dayak Congress logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Malaysian Ceylonese Congress logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Malaysian Ceylonese Congress logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kongres India Muslim Malaysia.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Kongres India Muslim Malaysia.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Angkatan Keadilan Insan Malaysia logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:Angkatan Keadilan Insan Malaysia logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:All Malaysian Indian Progressive Front logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:All Malaysian Indian Progressive Front logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Kongres India Muslim Malaysia.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kongres India Muslim Malaysia.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:59, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parti Ekonomi Rakyat Sarawak Bersatu logo.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parti Ekonomi Rakyat Sarawak Bersatu logo.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:UPKO logo.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:UPKO logo.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:HAMIM logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HAMIM logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parti Demokratik Setiahati Kuasa Rakyat Bersatu Sabah logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parti Demokratik Setiahati Kuasa Rakyat Bersatu Sabah logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:25, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:SPF logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SPF logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:25, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:SAPP logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SAPP logo.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parti bersatu sabah flag.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parti bersatu sabah flag.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sarawak Workers Party logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sarawak Workers Party logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Alexander Iskandar. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 16:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 16:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:PartiPunjabiMalaysia.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PartiPunjabiMalaysia.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Angkatan Keadilan Insan Malaysia logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Angkatan Keadilan Insan Malaysia logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Human Rights Party Malaysia logo.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Human Rights Party Malaysia logo.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parti Kerjasama Rakyat Sabah logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parti Kerjasama Rakyat Sabah logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:38, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parti Rakyat Gabungan Jaksa Pendamai logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parti Rakyat Gabungan Jaksa Pendamai logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:38, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parti Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Sabah Bersatu (Baru) logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parti Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Sabah Bersatu (Baru) logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:38, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parti Perpaduan Rakyat Sabah.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parti Perpaduan Rakyat Sabah.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:SAPP flag.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SAPP flag.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parti bersatu sabah flag.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parti bersatu sabah flag.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Logo PBS.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Logo PBS.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Gerakan flag.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gerakan flag.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parti Pekerja-Pekerja Malaysia.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parti Pekerja-Pekerja Malaysia.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:47, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:MDP logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MDP logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:03, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:MMSP-logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MMSP-logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:03, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Malaysian Indian United Party logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Malaysian Indian United Party logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parti Cinta Malaysia logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parti Cinta Malaysia logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:State Reform Party logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:State Reform Party logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Malaysian Dayak Congress logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Malaysian Dayak Congress logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Malaysian Ceylonese Congress logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Malaysian Ceylonese Congress logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Kongres India Muslim Malaysia logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kongres India Muslim Malaysia logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:All Malaysian Indian Progressive Front logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:All Malaysian Indian Progressive Front logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Haron Din, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simpang Empat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Parti bersatu sabah flag.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Parti bersatu sabah flag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hamim Samuri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ir. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I hereby award you this barnstar as a recognition for your hardwork on Malaysian political related articles. Many thanks! :) ~ Muffin Wizard ;) 07:20, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Raja Zarith Sofia.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Raja Zarith Sofia.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Raja Zarith Sofia.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Raja Zarith Sofia.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 02:03, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tuanku Fauziah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of List of Malaysian Leaders of the Opposition, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Opposition (Malaysia). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Malaysian State Assembly Representatives (2004–08)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Malaysian State Assembly Representatives (2004–08), Alexander Iskandar!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please complete the article.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Malaysian State Assembly Representatives (1999–2004)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Malaysian State Assembly Representatives (1999–2004), Alexander Iskandar!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for the construction template.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Reverts

Hello. Just wanted to apologies for reverting you on those two articles – not your fault – unfortunately Lazybugger has made a complete mess of an attempted move, and instead has simply made a WP:Cut and paste move, which is not allowed. Cheers, Number 57 20:14, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have misunderstood my intention - I did mean to revert you; cut and paste moves are not allowed, and you should not be making them. If you want to move the articles, please use the WP:RM process. Thanks, Number 57 20:35, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from the move issue, I just wanted to say thanks for creating all the State Assembly representative articles – they have helped me create all the state election ones (which you can see in here). However, many of them are incomplete (the first few only have Perlis state) – will you be completing them all? Also, do you know where actual vote figures can be found for state elections rather than just seats? Unfortunately the electoral commission site appears to be in Malay only and I cannot navigate it :( Number 57 22:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you, I will look at that tomorrow. I assume this is the page I want (it also appears to be Malay-only!). Cheers, Number 57 22:18, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, will try that. Annoyingly the translate function usually appears in my browser with Chrome when I am on foreign language, but it doesn't seem to happen with the Malay sites. Number 57 22:26, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You too :) Number 57 22:50, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Parliament of Malaysia logo.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Parliament of Malaysia logo.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TERAS

Hi Alexandar, I would like to help with creating a new colour scheme for TERAS that might have some similarities with their current logo and this would be inserted to into the following pages:

Will you be able to help with creating a new article page for TERAS?  I might be able to help with sources as well.  Thank you. Lazybugger13 (talk) 14:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Green Party of Malaysia, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.mesym.com/discussions/green-party-of-malaysia-azlan-adnan/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:30, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How to name lists that you create

Hi Alexander, Thanks for all your contributions! I've noticed that you've been creating a lot of lists and would like to remind you of the policy of WP:Listname which says that the page title of lists should start with "List of ___". Happy editing! Wugapodes (talk) 23:25, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Members of the Dewan Negara, 7th Malaysian Parliament, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://digplanet.com/wiki/Members_of_the_Dewan_Negara,_6th_Malaysian_Parliament.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:49, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Members of the Dewan Negara, 7th Malaysian Parliament (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to C. Krishnan
Members of the Dewan Negara, 8th Malaysian Parliament (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to C. Krishnan
Members of the Dewan Negara, 9th Malaysian Parliament (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ahmad Ismail

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Malayan local elections, 1953, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Malayan_local_elections,_1953&redlink=1.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:25, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Malayan local elections, 1952, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alexander Iskandar.
As you seem involved in political pages in this area, I was wondering if you could comment on, or confirm, the notability of this new political party? I have re-added the {{Notability}} tag to the page after the page creator removed it for a second time. Likely the best place would be that pages talk-page. If so, it would help if you sent me a notification about it. Regards, 220 of Borg 09:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Ghafar baba.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ghafar baba.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Musa-hitam.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Musa-hitam.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Musa-hitam.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Malayan local elections, 1956, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Malayan_local_elections,_1956&redlink=1.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Malaysian local elections, 1965, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Malaysian_local_elections,_1965&redlink=1.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:08, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Malayan federal electoral districts 1955–59 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Sentul, Jasin and Kesang
Malayan local elections, 1958 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Pontian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Next Sarawak state election, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mulu, Murum and Tarat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Office of the Prime Minister of Malaysia.png

Thanks for uploading File:Office of the Prime Minister of Malaysia.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jasin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PAS members turning independent

Hello, you recently removed siti zailah and che rosli che mat from pas' elected representatives. I went to check and found that they not did express intent to join ghb or turn independent, so i have put their names back on pas' elected representatives section. If u find source of them joining ghb feel free to add them back. I got a favour to ask though, could you re-edit the pages affecting siti zailah and che rosli because i don't have time to do it myself. Thanks

— Junchuann  04:26, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Parliamentary Secretaries of Malaysia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Damansara and Machang
First Razak cabinet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Langat
Second Mahathir cabinet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Baram
Third Abdullah cabinet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Baram
Third Mahathir cabinet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Baram
Third Rahman cabinet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to United Democratic Party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Menteris Besar of Johor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Jorak and Kesang
First Hussein cabinet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Damansara
List of Parliamentary Secretaries of Malaysia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Subang
Women in the Dewan Rakyat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Muar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Malaysian State Assembly Representatives (2013–)

In your recent edits to List of Malaysian State Assembly Representatives (2013–), the official name of the party Gerakan Harapan Baru has not been made official. They are looking for alternative names. I will leave the edits for the PAS members until there is official confirmation for the party name. And please do not put 2 different parties to a politician name in the tables, as we need to keep it current or else it would be confusing to new readers.Lazybugger13 (talk) 13:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PAS rebels are using the Malaysian Workers Party as a temporary measure and we also don't know if the registrar of societies will approved the moniker Parti Amanah Negara. So please don't create a link to that party before any confirmation is don't. And don't revert the changes to Sabah and Sarawak again. Thank you. Lazybugger13 (talk) 15:50, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please be patient and wait for the official news announcement on the name of the party, then create a new Wiki page for the party.Lazybugger13 (talk) 16:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Reformasi (Malaysia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Provocation and Mahathir Cabinet
Ganga Nayar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sentul

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Parti Amanah Negara

Hi Alexander, can you please named the sources for Kelaboran, Tendong and Pasir Puteh MP had join MWP? TQ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yakifahmi (talkcontribs) 15:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Malaysian Workers' Party

Please wait until there is further information regarding the renaming of the Malaysian Workers' Party to Amanah. I will then create a new colour scheme to go with the new party once they get the approval from the Registrar of Society for the name change and have their own logo.Lazybugger13 (talk) 06:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing you make these edit, do you have a source for it being disestablished in 1961? I would like to add it to the text if so. (I do not think the Singapore Elections source can be relied on as it has a question mark). Number 57 20:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have now changed the Labour Party date to 1958, but still no source. If you can't provide one, I will have to remove the categories. Cheers, Number 57 20:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of political parties in Malaysia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • India Malaysia'' ||MIC ||[[Subramaniam Sathasivam]] || || || ||1946 ||[http://www.mic.org.my/]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:37, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of political parties in Malaysia may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • of coalitions and parties that have representation in the [[Parliament of Malaysia]] (Dewan Rakyat]] & [[Dewan Negara]]) and/or the [[State legislative assemblies of Malaysia|state legislative
  • and parties that do not have representation in the [[Parliament of Malaysia]] (Dewan Rakyat]] & [[Dewan Negara]]) and the [[State legislative assemblies of Malaysia|state legislative

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bersih 2.0 rally (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bersih rally
Bersih 3.0 rally (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bersih rally
Bersih 4 rally (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bersih rally
Gerakan Harapan Baru (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Progressiveness

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of detainees at the Kamunting Detention Centre

The list was moved to a talkpage subpage because it was not appropriate as part of an article. It is even less appropriate as a standalone article. Shortly after you moved the list into mainspace it was prodded for deletion, and the notice came to me. I have restored the list to the talkpage subpage - see the history. If you wish to use the list it needs first to be reliably sourced. I'm not watching this page, so if you have any queries, please raise them on Talk:Internal Security Act (Malaysia). Regards SilkTork ✔Tea time 10:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Chinese people in Malaysia with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:51, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

Please do not add religion, ethnic, or descent categories or information to biography articles without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by reliably sourced article content and 2) the individual identifies as such. Please see WP:BLPCAT and WP:EGRS for additional information.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:30, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. You have added unsupported ethnic, descent and religious categories and created category pages to house them across hundreds and hundreds (thousands?) of articles. The amount of man hours that it will take to clean this up is daunting. Absolutely do not add any additional WP:EGRS categories to articles unless they meet the requirements outlined above.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:41, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Much as I admire your commitment, you need to not add these categories unless they are properly sourced. Thanks, --Rubbish computer 23:22, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just want to let you know that there is a tool to prevent the links from cluttering as per your previous edit on Joseph Pairin Kitingan article. Thanks! ~ Muffin Wizard ;) 00:32, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timorese in Malaysia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Timorese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moves of Malaysian ethnic group articles

I requested the reversion of your undiscussed moves through Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requests to revert undiscussed moves. You should get consensus before making controversial moves by following the directions at WP:RM#CM. Article titles should represent the "the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources", but names such as "Japanese Malaysians", "Burmese Malaysians", etc. are far less common in reliable sources than "Japanese in Malaysia", "Burmese in Malaysia", etc. Furthermore, most of the articles moved are about expatriates and guest workers from those countries, and not about Malaysian citizens. Thanks, 210.6.254.106 (talk) 10:44, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The census says nothing about whether Malaysians overseas are Malaysians or not, and neither did I. This discussion regards articles about foreign expatriates in Malaysia. You have not shown that "Japanese Malaysians" is "the name that is most frequently used ... in English-language reliable sources" to discuss Japanese expatriates in Malaysia. Same for every one of the articles which you unilaterally moved without consensus. 210.6.254.106 (talk) 02:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Asian diaspora in France

Hi, re this edit, you've not carried out all the necessary steps at WP:CFD#HOWTO. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:59, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9mNQICjn6DibxNr

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Malaysian films before 1960 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Thief of Bagdad
List of scandals in Malaysia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Breach of trust
Sport in Malaysia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wushu
Sri Lankans in Malaysia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sri Lankan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

If you make categories, please use the existing category structure. Please do not mass produce categories on subjects that do not have articles written yet. Be selective and thoughtful about category creation. Right now, I'm tagging a lot of categories you just created because they are empty and are not being utilized. This creates extra work for those who tag them and later for those who delete the pages. If there isn't a clear use for a category, and it makes sense in the existing Wikipedia category structure, do not create the category. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ethnic groups in Malaysia

Why have you completely changed how the original template looked like? You removed Malaysians from the template and removed Malaysian Chinese and Malaysian Indian and put them into immigration to Malaysia. Yes they have immigrated to Malaysia but the link that you have included for Immigration to Malaysia redirects to Illegal immigrants to Malaysia. How is this acceptable? Are you implying that these people are illegal and who gave you the right to change how the entire template looked like? (124.180.199.116 (talk) 09:43, 22 October 2015 (UTC))[reply]

checkY @124.180.199.116: Replied on my talkpage. ~ Muffin Wizard ;) 10:13, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexander Iskandar: Please do not move the page without any discussion on the talkpage, doing so would be considered as controversial page move. Every country deserving its own ethnic groups template as you can see on other Southeast Asian countries: {{Ethnic groups in Brunei}}, {{Ethnic groups in Cambodia}}, {{Ethnic groups in Indonesia}}, {{Ethnic groups in Laos}}, {{Ethnic groups in Myanmar}}, {{Ethnic groups in the Philippines}}, {{Ethnic groups in Singapore}}, {{Ethnic groups in Thailand}}, {{Ethnic groups in Vietnam}}. ~ Muffin Wizard ;) 11:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Parliament of Malaysia logo.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Parliament of Malaysia logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Immigration to Malaysia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malaysian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sarawak People's Energy Party logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sarawak People's Energy Party logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Parliament of Malaysia logo.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parliament of Malaysia logo.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Rather than reverting, and leaving comments in edit summaries, please show signs you are prepared to seek third party review of the edits at the template JarrahTree 13:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see what looks like a constructive discussion to resolve the issue apart from continued reverts, some other watchers may well feel that the location for the discussion will be at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring - so it would well be worth explaining yourself (with proper signature usage) at a talk page relevant to the template issues. Failure to do so could lead to an admin deciding to block you. Take care. JarrahTree 14:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Someone else can deal with you both in your template arguments, If it is how you want to resolve the issue, then make sure you try to build consensus rather than reverting each other regularly, as the process by which you are resolving looks to an outsider like an edit war. JarrahTree 23:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have replied this on my talkpage, clearly JarrahTree have a misunderstanding here for us to have a conflict while I'm only reverting Alexander Iskandar edit for once. ~ Muffin Wizard ;) 01:25, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is good that you aim to encompass all Malaysians but don't you think that the template is not really appropriate for Malaysia. After all, the ethnic groups listed in the Canadian template lead to pages such as Basque Canadian and French Canadian. Rohingya does not lead to a page called Rohingya Malaysian or Rohingyas in Malaysia. Also Baba Nonya and Jawi Peranakan aren't exactly East Asian and South Asian in origin respectively. The Baba Nonyas and Jawi Peranakan also have mixed Malay origins too. I prefer the previous template that was originally there before the major revamps that occurred at the start of this month and then last week. I know you are trying to make all Malaysians feel like they belong and I commend you on that but personally I believe the original version was better, what do you think? (124.181.70.197 (talk) 07:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aziz Kaprawi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Malaysian
Internal Security Act 1960 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Suppression
Official Secrets Act 1972 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Restricted

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template changing

I think you need to stop adding "Malaylam Malyasian" and "Americans in Malaysia" when there are no pages that are even called that. The template should not have been changed in the first place and you need to respond to people who tell you things on your talk page before going ahead and editing a template that is disputed. That's why there's something called a talk page. (124.180.139.33 (talk) 09:18, 1 November 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Empty categories

Hello, Alexander Iskandar,
I can see you are trying to help but please do not remove parent categories or any information from categories that are tagged for deletion. Often, the admins who consider the deletion want to see where the category is placed in a categorical hierarchy and choose to keep them even though at the moment they might be empty. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 15:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Malaysian films of the 1990s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ella (singer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:List of scandals in Malaysia

Template:List of scandals in Malaysia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Relentlessly (talk) 18:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of political parties in Malaysia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Malaysian Ceylonese Congress logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Malaysian Ceylonese Congress logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Heritage Act, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National heritage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Control copyright icon Hello Alexander Iskandar, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Ministry of Home Affairs (Malaysia) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Ministry of Health (Malaysia) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 01:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United Malays National Organisation leaders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohamad Hasan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prime Minister of Malaysia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vision 2020 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (Malaysia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mapping and Mines
Ministry of Plantation Industries and Commodities (Malaysia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Pepper and Cocoa
Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (Malaysia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Nuclear and Standards
Ministry of Tourism and Culture (Malaysia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Heritage and Convention
Ministry of Transport (Malaysia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Maritime and Marine
Ministry of Defence (Malaysia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Veterans affairs
Ministry of Higher Education (Malaysia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Polytechnic
Ministry of Home Affairs (Malaysia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Rehabilitation
Ministry of Human Resources (Malaysia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Labour

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Standing Orders of the Dewan Rakyat, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.readbag.com/parlimen-my-news-pm-dr-bi.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:58, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Kinabalu and Pontian
Minister of Home Affairs (Malaysia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kinabalu
Ministry of Communications and Multimedia (Malaysia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Postal
Ministry of Health (Malaysia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dental care
Ministry of Transport (Malaysia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Logistic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Production and Distribution
Chief Ministers in Malaysia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Executive council

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MPs elected in 1969

Hello Alexander. I have just noticed a contradiction between Malaysian general election, 1969 and Members of the Dewan Rakyat, 3rd Malaysian Parliament. According to the election article, the Sarawak Chinese Association won one seat, but in the members list, they have two seats. In contrast, the election article has 6 seats for Bumiputera but the list has only five. Are you able to state which is correct? Cheers, Number 57 21:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited President of the Dewan Negara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paramjit Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Dato" redirects

It would be best to mass-nominate these for RFD, as these are not empty pages (they are redirects), and deliberately blanking them to tag them is not what the deletion process should be used for. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:20, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I should also note that I would be willing to help you with this, but CSD is the wrong way to go for that, especially when some of the redirects are almost a decade old. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding notification tags to all of our pages for discussions that we are only vaguely involved in. One is enough, but two or more that lead to the wrong page are hard to follow. Also, please make sure that you leave the right date, as all of the links you left today lead to the wrong day. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed about wrong date. How to fix this problem? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 02:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and fixed the earlier ones, but I think it would be easier to copy and paste an existing notice, but modify the text so that it leads to the right discussion. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Rfdnote.. just adding |days= if the page was listed yesterday. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:48, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Categories (again)

I'd like to reiterate that, per policy, you cannot add ethnic or descent categories to biography articles unless the category is supported by sourced article content. I've reverted your edit here for this reason. Please do not continue to add such categories.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Elections Act 1958

Hi, I'm Geramany. Alexander Iskandar, thanks for creating Elections Act 1958!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references to verify page information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Geramany (talk) 14:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tan Seng Giaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malaysian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Malaysian pages

It seems most of them have uneeded DAB's, so when adding them check to see if the page without the DAB exists which quite a few don't (which I moved them for you) Wgolf (talk) 18:18, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gombak (federal constituency) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gombak (federal constituency) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gombak (federal constituency) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sports Devotee (talk) 11:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

A tag has been placed on Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak Baru candidates, 2016 Sarawak state election requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not appropriate, per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NPOLITICIAN

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. John from Idegon (talk) 01:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Election Results Sarawak 2016

Hi Alexander Iskandar, I have seen that you have created a new template - . That is fine if you wish to create individual templates for each state constituency. That is a lot of work in my opinion. But for the election results we should keep the election results table as it is following what was used Sarawak_state_election,_2011 and update it from there when the election results come it. In the meantime I have hidden both election results tables until the results come in.Lazybugger13 (talk) 03:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We should change the way we update the election result. We should update election result by constituency one by one in each state constituency article. The readers able to compare the recent election result with past election result in respective constituency.. For example, if readers (especially Opar voters) curious to know the recent result of his constituency, he/she may go to this article --> Opar (state constituency), they can compare with previous election result of Opar. I find it more effective and straight forward. What is your opinion about this? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:14, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can check each constituency article for comparison if you like but creating a different election article for each state constituency is a lot of work. If we have all the election results information in one table for the entire state, that is also fine. You can go ahead and create those state constituency results tables, but leave the election results tables alone and don't delete it. Thank you.Lazybugger13 (talk) 03:30, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lazybugger13: Win-win situation.. I let you update the election result in one table in the Sarawak state election, 2016. I just found from your talk page that you contribute a lot about Malaysian election-related pages and templates. I really appreciate about your passion to make something better about Malaysian election-related pages and templates.. We really need to have a good co-operation in this matter. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lazybugger13: Do you think it is a good idea to create WikiProject about Malaysian elections, Malaysian politics, Malaysian governments, Malaysian legislatures, Malaysian legislations?? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:43, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Iskandar, it is a good idea if you would like to create a WikiProject just for Malaysian elections. Its always best to head to the WikiProject Malaysia and get feedback and see if there are any editors who will volunteer and help with the project.Lazybugger13 (talk) 06:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know why WikiProject Malaysia seems not really active as expected. Maybe, Wikipedia visitors from Malaysia don't really bother to contribute something in this Wikipedia and only be a silent reader and use Wikipedia as their one-stop centre to look for academic references. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 06:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Pardon me for butting in here, but can I try to contribute with only the hexagons of the Sarawak seats?

If you have no idea what I'm talking about, here's a reference. Hytar (talk) 23:43, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hytar:. Sounds interesting. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 02:01, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway I'm now rearranging the hexagons, since they have new seats. That will take a while... Hytar (talk) 22:46, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

Separate articles for parties contesting the Sarawak 2016 election

Hi Alexander Iskandar, you have created several separate articles for parties contesting the Sarawak state elections, I feel these articles are unnecessary as we already have the election tables give out the right amount of information - Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak Baru candidates, 2016 Sarawak state election,State Reform Party candidates, 2016 Sarawak state election. Rather than that we should just use the election results tables as it show who is contesting which seat and from which party. Anyway if you look at those articles some parties are just contesting less than 10 seats, that is insignificant or just overkill in my opinion.Lazybugger13 (talk) 03:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)in[reply]

@Lazybugger13: What is your opinion about this article --> Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta candidates, 2012 Alberta provincial election and all party's election candidates pages in this category --> Category:Alberta general election, 2012. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Iskandar, again the article which you used Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta candidates, 2012 Alberta provincial election has that party contesting in closed to 50 seats, whereas in Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak Baru and State Reform Party you have them contesting just 5 and 11 seats respectively out of 82 seats. Maybe you should merge them, with say Amanah or PAS. Either make an entire new article to combine Amanah, PAS, Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak Baru and STAR together.Lazybugger13 (talk) 06:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that we should let it be until the 11th Sarawak state election ended.. Then, after that we can merge all those party's election candidates pages into Candidates of the 2016 Sarawak state election. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 06:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sarawak Workers Party logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sarawak Workers Party logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sarawak People's Energy Party logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sarawak People's Energy Party logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bayan Baru (disambiguation)

The article Bayan Baru (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary as this seems to be a case of WP:TWODABS, where a hatnote at the Bayan Baru page serves as disambiguation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InsertCleverPhraseHere 04:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Turning it into a redirect seems like a reasonable solution. InsertCleverPhraseHere 05:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Insertcleverphrasehere:.. Thanks for letting me know about WP:TWODABS policy. Hopefully, bots and other users will differentiate between Malaysian administrative district and Malaysian constituency when they want to insert internal link. I will left to bots or other users to correct the internal links issue, e.g. Gombak District and Gombak (federal constituency) will be linked properly in the related articles. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 05:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't create redirects with "(disambiguation)" in the title that do not target disambiguation pages. Such redirects should only be created for intentional links to disambiguation pages. olderwiser 10:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
i noticed you make alot of pages on Malaysian federal constituencies. Good job Etimena 13:57, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I created this page just for you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Defunct_Federal_Constituencies_of_Malaysia

@Etimena:. For your information, the defunct federal constituencies of Malaysia article --> List of former Malaysian federal electoral districts already created. By the way, thanks for your Barnstar. :) Alexander Iskandar (talk) 23:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Disambiguation for parliamentary elections and federal constituencies

Hi Alexander Iskandar, I see you have created numerous articles for federal constituencies - Sungai Besar (federal constituency), Kuala Kangsar (federal constituency) and have added templates to numerous election articles - Permatang Pauh by-election, 2015, Rompin by-election, 2015; suggesting for a merger. The by-elections articles should stay as they are they are political articles and should not be merged and the templates should be removed. While I commend you for creating the various federal constituency articles, you should slowly include links to towns in the constituencies, demographics, transportation, economy, culture and geography. Plus you need to included direct references for these articles for the various subjects. You might need help in getting WP:MALAYSIA guys to help out. In the meantime I have created two new election articles for the 2 upcoming by-elections- Kuala Kangsar by-election, 2016 and Sungai Besar by-election, 2016.Lazybugger13 (talk) 03:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interpretation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

Category:Siblings of Prime Ministers of Malaysia has been nominated for discussion

Category:Siblings of Prime Ministers of Malaysia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orders of precedence

Salam/Greeting. If you want to review articles related to orders of precedence, please don't delete the table and make a straight list. It makes the order of precedence more organised and convenient for everyone to read. Aamuizz (talk) 04:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Abdul Malek Yusuf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Rembau
Sulaiman Ninam Shah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Muar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Malaysian comedy horror films has been nominated for discussion

Category:Malaysian comedy horror films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

Reference errors on 8 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

July 2016

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Dangerous Drugs Act 1952. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Telemedicine Act

The infobox says both:not yet in force and Given Royal assent. These two seem contradictory. Additionally, the informatio ngiven is a mere firectory entry; it needs some morei nformation, and especially on whether it has been amended or whatever since 197. This is almost 20 years later. DGG ( talk ) 14:36, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Democratic Action Party leadership election, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Fernandez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Najib Razak Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah.png

Thank you for uploading File:Najib Razak Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:28, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

Pointless headings

Please don't start another edit war. There is no point in having a "State Assemblies" heading in an article solely about State Assembly results. Why do you think it should be included? Number 57 21:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

Malaysian constituency pages

Thank you for your amazing articles created for each Malaysian federal and state constituencies. I express my highest appreciation. Ueutyi (talk) 08:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Ueutyi (talk) 08:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you've done a lot of work related to Malaysian elections. In particular, you added popular vote totals for each party in the states of Perlis, Kedah, Kelantan, Terengganu, and Penang to the page Malaysian general election, 2013. If you don't mind, could you share with me the source you got these results from? I have an academic interest in popular vote results at the state level, so I would really appreciate it if you could give me a source so that I can find these results for the rest of the states. Thank you so much! SaltySeas (talk) 03:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

Hi. I see you've edited the article about George Town recently.

An article I wrote about the Seri Rambai cannon at Fort Cornwallis is now a Featured article candidate; you're welcome to add comments. Singora (talk) 13:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Alexander Iskandar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

Death date discrepancy at Mubin Sheppard

Hi. I'm just looking into a discrepancy in death date between here and Wikidata at Mubin Sheppard. It look like you changed this from 11 September to 12 September. I can't access the ref to support that (the page you linked to doesn't load), and others say 11 September, so I'll change it back for now - but if it was the 12th September then please feel free to revert it back, but please also change it on Wikidata. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

Nomination of Penal Code (Malaysia) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Penal Code (Malaysia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penal Code (Malaysia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Historian (talk) 18:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Justice Party leadership election, 2001 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Justice Party leadership election, 2001 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 08:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

The article Sarawak Workers Party candidates, 2016 Sarawak state election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No candidates listed, so there is bo useful content. Appears to be an abandoned draft

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

A page you started (Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation (Malaysia)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation (Malaysia), Alexander Iskandar!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 17:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Johor Bahru City Council has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 03:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Malacca City Council has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 04:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Malacca City Council, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 04:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Shah Alam City Council has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 04:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seberang Perai Municipal Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Butterworth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Kuala Terengganu City Council has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Alor Star requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 14:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pengurusan Aset Air has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No useful information. No references. Does not even say what country.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pengurusan Aset Air for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pengurusan Aset Air is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pengurusan Aset Air until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Information icon Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Pengurusan Air Pahang Berhad, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Template:Z44 Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 09:53, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Filipino Americans does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of African millionaires page move

I think that is controversial. Please get consensus at talk first. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:30, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Per WP:BRD, please discuss and gain consensus at article talk. Please do not move that article again. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Petronas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MISC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Canadians

Hi there - on your most recent edit to List of Canadians, your edit summary was, "ethno-national group under ethnicity umbrella". What does that mean? How does it relate to a list of people whose family ethnicities include British, French, Irish, Jewish/Israeli, Japanese, Romanian, Ukrainian, Chinese, Persian, Indian, and that's just the first 10 that I found in the list? "Canadian" is not an ethnicity - we are a mosaic of people from all over the world. PKT(alk) 21:12, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know what is panethnicity concept about? Panethnic group includes diverse populations who have ancestral origins in many places. Not to be confused with Race (human categorization) concept. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 07:47, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Theoretically, it is possible to group together British Canadian, French Canadian, Irish Canadian as Canadian ethnic group in the United States Census. This applied to Canadian diaspora. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 07:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicity is not the same thing as nationality

I don't know why you are changing categories from Category:Lists of people by nationality to Category:Lists of people by ethnicity, but it doesn't seem to be warranted, and I'm not aware of any consensus to do so. Ethnicity and nationality are two different things. I have changed the categories back for the time being. ... discospinster talk 21:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nominations

Before nominating any more pages for speedy deletion please read WP:CSD. The criteria listed there are the only ones that should be used. I have declined quite a few of your nominations as they don't fall into one of the listed criteria. ~ GB fan a "frantic, furious ball of anger" 11:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, do not nominate any more pages for speedy deletion unless they meet one of the criterion at WP:CSD. ~ GB fan a "frantic, furious ball of anger" 11:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A3 No content Alexander Iskandar (talk) 11:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A3 says it does not apply to redirects. Please read the criterion. ~ GB fan a "frantic, furious ball of anger" 11:48, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zambian Americans redirected to Category:American people of Zambian descent. Is it good redirect? From article mainspace redirect to category? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 12:02, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

R2 does not apply either as it states that cross space namespace from the main space does not apply to redirects to the category space. I am not making any conclusion as to whether this is a good redirect or not, just evaluating of the page is deletable under a speedy deletion criterion. If you think the page should be deleted take it to WP:RFD. ~ GB fan a "frantic, furious ball of anger" 12:11, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move the request

Lin Rong-SanLin Rong-san --111.71.49.236 (talk) 14:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it wrong to use capital S? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 14:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

It's a good idea to provide a rationale for deletion when nominating articles. MB298 (talk) 04:21, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Monegasque billlionaires requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 18:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfD listings

Hey Alexander Iskandar, not sure if it was you, but because you made the AfDs, I'm going to assume it was you. Just a note that when you make an AfD, you don't copy and paste the contents onto the log. You need to transclude the template by doing this:
{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omani Americans}}

That puts the AfD onto the page:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Omani Americans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable ethnic group. No reliable or significant coverage. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 07:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. What an odd little article, which attests to its own non-notability: "It is certain that Oman has a very small diaspora" -- apparently because of the wonderfulness of staying in Oman. That's fine. No reason at all to have an article though, that I can find. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable. Sails pretty close to the wind of WP:G11 as an advert for Oman... Cordless Larry (talk) 18:32, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

If you do this it allows easier access to the page instead of needing to manually find it. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Wealth in Palestine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 19:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bangi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection of high school articles

Please stop redirecting high school articles. If you consider that they are not notable please obtain consensus on their talk page or take individually to WP:AFD. Just Chilling (talk) 13:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that in China many "Middle Schools" are in fact secondary schools with senior high school. WhisperToMe (talk) 15:22, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Dalat International School, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jdcomix (talk) 15:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators Noticeboard

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Just Chilling (talk) 16:20, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is unacceptable. Unilaterally redirecting a page is perfectly fine, as it can be easily overturned if contested. But you can't just appoint yourself the one-man notability police and go around rapidly removing large amounts of articles from this project. You're wholly circumventing deletion process and community consensus and essentially making it impossible for every redirection to be contested and discussed per WP:ATD-R due to the sheer volume of redirects you're creating. What makes this even more problematic is that in practice high schools are usually kept as notable, so the argument for redirecting them isn't necessarily even that strong to begin with. This is disruptive, and this is your last warning. You will be blocked if you continue. Swarm 16:42, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Cluster Schools in Malaysia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 13:28, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moving categories

Hello. You shouldn't move categories other than via the official processes at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy - there may be reasons why a category is named as it is that aren't obvious to you - and doing it the official way is a lot less effort, as there are bots to do all the hard work! Le Deluge (talk) 15:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


May 2017

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing and blanking all school articles in Malaysia. its unnecessary, the page has existed for long time and you just blanked it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FarGah1 (talkcontribs) 15:13, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

King Edward VII School, Taiping (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Joginder Singh and Randhir Singh
Bukit Mertajam High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Public school
Maxwell School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nelson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

British Council category

Hi Alexander. I saw that you added Refugee Council to Category:British Council, and then noticed that you'd done the same with several other organisations. Unless I'm mistaken, most of them aren't affiliated with the British Council. Could your categorisation have been a mistake? Cordless Larry (talk) 22:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an explanation for these edits, or should they be reverted? Cordless Larry (talk) 15:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe we should add not to be confused template on the top of page to get rid of confusion. For unfamiliar readers, they may assume British Council have affiliation with British Council for Aid to Refugees. Same case to another "British Council of"-related pages. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a "main article" link to British Council at the top of the category page, or were you thinking of somewhere else? Cordless Larry (talk) 16:26, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I edited those pages today. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 16:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dziaddin Mukarram Shah II of Kedah

Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. Alexander Iskandar, thanks for creating Dziaddin Mukarram Shah II of Kedah!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Adding references to reliable sources would improve the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

TonyBallioni (talk) 00:57, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1953 establishments in North Borneo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 13:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1953 in North Borneo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 13:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Royal house of Selangor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 13:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Hospitals in Malacca requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Johor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Kedah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Kelantan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Kuala Lumpur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Malacca requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Negeri Sembilan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Pahang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Penang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Perak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Perlis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Sabah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Selangor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Universities in Terengganu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Universities in Sarawak has been nominated for discussion

Category:Universities in Sarawak, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpbT 16:44, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping redirecting Malaysia school to their respective list. I have been busy doing work in real life so I don't have time to edit them since this RfC. Please also note that there are people reverting your edits such as this. You should probably state why you redirect page in your edit summary by the way. QianCheng虔诚 10:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those articles should be redirected to their respective school list until reliable sources are added and it clearly meets WP:NOTE. Interested editors are welcomed to improve those articles by adding reliable sources. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why they have time to revert my edits but they don't show their efforts by adding reliable sources. Those pages left unreferenced since many years ago. This is Wikipedia and Wikipedia is a place for encyclopedic content not for trivial, rumours, original research, primary sources. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 11:11, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


category changes

it would be very useful for anyone trying to make any sense of your category changes - to actually add edit summaries, where possible, so that your moving and changes might be understood - as it is, it is difficult in all WP:AGF to understand exactly what you are up to JarrahTree 10:22, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am sure you mean well, but it is better to nominate categories for renaming than simply moving them. Example Category:Fula media to Category:Fula-language media, leaves the content in Fula media. Please check out Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. Tim! (talk) 17:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works by Abdul Razak Mohaideen has been nominated for discussion

Category:Works by Abdul Razak Mohaideen, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:57, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! You just made Malaysia New Articles too big to be included!

You had made User:AlexNewArtBot/MalaysiaSearchResult so big that WP:MY is currently under Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded. I hope you feel good for yourself. --QianCheng虔诚 05:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Abdul Hamid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sultan Abdul Hamid II
Yusof Basiron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Rembau

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that the deletion notice on January 2007 in Oceania points to an altogether different discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 2006 in Malaysia and Singapore). There is no actual entry for it that I can find on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Dawnseeker2000 19:20, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion: January 2007 in Oceania2007 in Oceania. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 19:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, please stop what you're doing. If what you're wanting is a move discussion, you're not doing it correctly. You've placed deletion notices on at last fifty articles that point to an unrelated deletion discussion (the one that I mentioned above; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April 2006 in Malaysia and Singapore). If you have a move suggestion for an article, please use the article's talk page and follow the instructions at WP:RM. Dawnseeker2000 19:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 200X in Y merged to 200X in Y. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 19:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Mudzaffar Shah) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mudzaffar Shah, Alexander Iskandar!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful disambiguation page! In the future, when creating a disambiguation page, do not include the (disambiguation) as part of the page title when the title without the (disambiguation) doesn't exist yet.

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 18:25, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A7 Speedy deletion of films

Do not nominate any more films for speedy deletion using the A7 criterion. I just went through and declined 11 nominations of films that you made. For an article to be speedy deleted using A7 it must be about a real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event. If the article is not about one of those five limited areas then it can not be speedy deleted using that criterion. Films are not one of the 5 subject areas that are eligible. If you have any questions please ask. ~ GB fan 10:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How to nominate any film for speedy deletion? Under what criterion actually? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 10:57, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no speedy deletion criterion that can be applied to films that do not show a claim to significance. If you do not believe the films are notable you can nominate them for deletion using WP:PROD or WP:AFD. ~ GB fan 11:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also just declined your two A7 nominations of pages in the Draft namespace. All the speedy deletion criterion that start with A can only be used in the mainspace. They can not be used in the Draft space. If you believe the drafts should be deleted you can nominate them for deletion using WP:MFD. ~ GB fan 11:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A10 begins with an A, so it does not apply to pages in the Draft namespace. ~ GB fan 11:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to move those articles with unreferenced tag or notability issue to Draft namespace? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 11:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Without looking at the specific articles you are talking about it is hard to answer the question. ~ GB fan 11:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see you have added the MFD template to 6 articles but have not completed the nomination process. Click on this WP:MFD#How to list pages for deletion, then click on the "Show" link in the green box. There are three steps listed that you must complete for each one of those MFD nominations. ~ GB fan 11:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Adira

Hello Alexander Iskandar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Adira, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. SoWhy 11:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to move Adira to Draft:Adira? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 12:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article was created in 2011, has over 200 edits made to it. It should not be moved to the Draft space. If you do not believe it meets the notability guidelines nominate it for deletion using WP:AFD. ~ GB fan 12:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Kaer Azami

Hello Alexander Iskandar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kaer Azami, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: claims coverage in reliable source. Also, after ten years, it should really be taken to WP:AFD instead. Thank you. SoWhy 11:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to move Kaer Azami to Draft:Kaer Azami. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 12:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read what SoWhy wrote? The article has been around for over 10 years. Take it to WP:AFD if you feel it should be deleted. ~ GB fan 12:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Nana (deejay)

Hello Alexander Iskandar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nana (deejay), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: regularly writing for a notable newspaper indicates significance. Thank you. SoWhy 12:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to move Nana (deejay) to Draft:Nana (deejay). Alexander Iskandar (talk) 12:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, No. This was created in 2006 with well over 100 edits to it. If you feel notability is not there, nominate it at WP:AFD. ~ GB fan 12:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Riz (singer)

Hello Alexander Iskandar, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Riz (singer), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 12:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to move Riz (singer) to Draft:Riz (singer)? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 12:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Answering all of the questions above: Not without consensus. Draftspace is designed to allow page creators to work on it, not to allow admins to bypass the deletion policy. I strongly advise that you familiarize yourself with the relevant policies, especially the speedy deletion policy and the strict and limited scope of WP:CSD#A7. The number of mistakes you have made is staggering for an experienced user. Regards SoWhy 12:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Nikki (Malaysian singer)

Hello Alexander Iskandar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nikki (Malaysian singer), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: collaborating with a notable artist indicates significance. Thank you. SoWhy 12:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Ash Nair

Hello Alexander Iskandar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ash Nair, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. SoWhy 12:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Farah Asyikin Zulkifli

Hello Alexander Iskandar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Farah Asyikin Zulkifli, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: significance assumed per WP:SILENCE after 10 years, use WP:AFD instead. Thank you. SoWhy 12:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G13 nominations

Please read the documentation on Template:Db-g13. It explains how to manually nominate a Draft for deletion using G-13. ~ GB fan 12:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you nominate Draft:TVBS Media Inc. for review? Do you believe it is in shape to move to the mainspace? Or are you trying to get around the fact that G13 only applies to articles with the AFC header? ~ GB fan 12:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Draft Articles

Why are you moving draft articles to other names within the Draft namespace. The name they are at while a draft doesn't matter much. If the name doesn't correspond to the contents of the article then move it. If it isn't located at a draft name that it would be if it ever gets moved to the main space then leave it be. It does not hurt anything and you are just creating a bunch of unneeded redirects. ~ GB fan 13:55, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is necessary to remove honorific from title page. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 13:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is not necessary to remove the honorific from Drafts. If those were actual articles, then yes, but they aren't articles, they are drafts. Drafts do not need to comply with WP:Title. ~ GB fan 14:01, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So how to improve those drafts? Just left those draft title with honorific prefix Dr.? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 14:14, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to improve the Drafts, look for reliable sources, add the reliable sources with content to the draft. Show that they are notable and then move the drafts to an appropriate article title. The Drafts can sit at the name with the honorific, it doesn't make any difference until they are moved to the mainspace. ~ GB fan 14:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap. "Redirects are cheap. Redirects take up minimal disk space and use very little bandwidth. Thus, it doesn't really hurt things if there are a few of them scattered around." Deleting a redirect actually adds very slightly to the size of the database (since deleted pages are not really purged from the database, just hidden from public view). Unless a redirect is actively misleading or gets in the way of a pagemove, there is little point in deleting it. What is your opinion? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 14:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they are cheap, but there is no reason to move draft pages from one name to another. No one is suggesting to delete the redirects. I am saying don't make them for no reason. You are moving things that don't need to be moved and creating unnecessary redirects. Find something productive to do. ~ GB fan 14:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No reason? Remove honorific from draft title doesn't really hurt things. Draft redirect take up minimal disk space and use very little bandwidth. Is it wrong to rename draft title? I don't request those drafts to be deleted but renamed them without honorific prefix. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 14:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No one said that moving them hurt anything, I said it was unnecessary and creating a bunch of unneeded redirects. It doesn't hurt to have the honorific in the title of the Draft page either. Unless you can show me where it says that draft pages must comply with WP:TITLE, there is no reason to move them. Moving them just makes extra redirects and extra uneeded edits to the pages and is disruptive. ~ GB fan 15:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extra redirect = cheap redirect?? Tell me how cheap redirect become harmful and uncontrollable. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 15:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I never said they were harmful. I never said they were uncontrollable. I said the moves were unnecessary and they created unneeded redirects. Unless you can point to something that says they should be moved to a new name without the honorifics, don't move them. ~ GB fan 15:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the inconvenience to you, GB fan. After arguing with you about moving drafts, I learnt that moving drafts are not same like moving articles. Draft namespace is different from article namespace, so WP:TITLE is not necessarily applied to draft project. I know some drafts only exist temporarily and may be deleted soon due to unencyclopedic content. I also found many drafts left abandoned more than 6 month with no obvious effort by editors to add reliable sources. I decided to just add template db-g13 when possible and let other admins make a decision what to do next. Another problems about drafts will be handled by another enthusiast Wikipedia editors. By the way, sorry for my troublesome behaviours. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 18:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is OK. ~ GB fan 18:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Am I doing the right action to add template db-g13? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 18:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are close. Two things. First the criterion has a couple of stipulations. The first thing you have got it right, it must have not been edited in over six months. The second part is where you need to look a little closer. The criterion says "This criterion applies to draft articles in the draft namespace or userspace that are using the project's {{AFC submission}} template." When I saw your question, I went to your contributions and the first one I pulled up was Draft:Dr. David Suzuki Public School Wilderness Reserve. This does not have the template on on it, so it is not eligible for G13 speedy deletion. The other thing you should look at is the something I mentioned earlier. There is an extra parameter in Template:Db-g13. If you click the link, it will take you to the template. The usage section explains how to manually nominate a Draft for deletion using G-13. ~ GB fan 19:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dr. David Suzuki Public School Wilderness Reserve does not have {{AFC submission}} so I learnt that it is not eligible for G13 speedy deletion yet. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 19:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This draft may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a rejected or unsubmitted Articles for Creation page that has not been edited in over six months (excluding bot edits). This applies to all pages that contain an Articles for Creation template, in draft namespace or userspace. See CSD G13. Alexander Iskandar (talk)

What is your opinion about moving Draft:Dr. Peter Aiken to Draft:Peter Aiken? It is done by Dodger67 on 12:43, 4 January 2017‎ (UTC) based on revision history. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 20:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ GB fan 14:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You need to stop moving draft articles around. It is unnecessary. All you are doing is making a bunch of unneeded redirects. ~ GB fan 14:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have you been using this IP to redirect school articles? Just Chilling (talk) 19:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 19:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy G13 deletions

First of all, thank you for your editing here. I note that you are nominating some draft articles for G13 speedy deletion, and to date your selection of articles is correct; but your nomination procedure is not. The template, correctly used, shows the date of last edit . To see how to do this, please follow the instructions laid down in template {{db-g13}}.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Further to my previous post, I have now found some drafts that you have nominated too early. The six-month limit may not be shortened for a G13 nomination. Please be more careful. We as admins have enough to do without having unnecessary work created for us.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have now worked through all of your g13 tags currently on display. I have removed eight as being incorrect; two more I left because they reach the six-month mark within the next 48 hours. the rest - less than one third - I have actioned. Please, if you wish to make these nomib=nations, get the procedure right. The last edit must be no less than 6 months ago, and the article must contain an AfC template.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Moss

Hello, I have removed the proposed deletion tag you placed on Paul Moss. This article was discussed at Articles for deletion in 2005 and is therefore permanently ineligible for deletion under the proposed deletion process. I did this for procedural reasons only, and have no comment one way or the other on the merits of the deletion nomination. If you still wish to pursue deletion, please open another AfD discussion. Thanks, —KuyaBriBriTalk 00:16, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hafiz (Malaysian singer)

You seem to have mistakenly placed a PROD tag on an article which was not eligible. I have removed it and explained why on the talk page. If you still believe that the article is eligible for deletion, you will need to use the WP:AFD procedure, although I personally believe you would be wasting your time. Please read the message I've left you on the article's talk page and readjust your current editing practices. Thank you. — Tuxipεdia(talk) 08:37, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning : No more speedy tagging

I'm afraid I have seen you make too many mistakes in CSD tagging, as have other administrators, so this is a warning that the next time I see a speedy tag declined by an administrator (either me or somebody else), I will be forced to block you from editing to avoid disruption. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:29, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your PROD from Jamal Abdillah. Your rationale was that the article was largely unsourced. It is an article of 6 sentences with 5 sources. That appears to be a valid number of sources for the length of the article. ~ GB fan 10:42, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another one, Noraniza Idris. She has won 12 awards. While there may not be much sourcing in the article this is definitely not a non-controversial deletion. The only time a PROD should be used is if the deletion is non-controversial. ~ GB fan 10:50, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nicestupidplayground, how is this a largely unsourced BLP? It is an article about a band. It looks like you just copied and pasted a rationalle and started slapping it on articles. ~ GB fan 11:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto for Danny Choo. I have no prejudice against nominating this article at AfD but it will have to be under some other valid deletion rationale. —KuyaBriBriTalk 14:10, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you need to stop whatever else you're doing and give an explanation here right now, or there'll have to be a block to force you to do it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:16, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ritchie333, That is what it took yesterday for them to talk about their moves of Draft pages. ~ GB fan 14:20, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Siti Nurhaliza videography

Hello Alexander Iskandar. I notice that you changed the page Siti Nurhaliza filmography to Siti Nurhaliza videography recently. Please note that her filmography is for her television, theatre and film credits and her videography was for her music video and advertising credits. I hope you pay attention. – Fandi89 (talk) 02:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sudirman Arshad

Hello Alexander Iskandar. We really hope that you remove the PROD template to Sudirman Arshad. The sources has been given just now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.140.89.61 (talk) 02:51, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
» Shadowowl | talk 10:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This submission really makes me question if you have the competence to perform maintenance tasks. When you submitted it for review did you really believe it was ready to be moved to the mainspace? ~ GB fan 10:47, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
International Day of Action for Women's Health, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

» Shadowowl | talk 11:11, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop moving pages - you have just created a massive mess. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:27, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You were told multiple times by multiple admins that it is not allowed to move articles out of the main namespace without consensus. Yet you just did so with Zizan Razak. I see no request by the original creator for this to be done and no discussion that resulted in draftifying. As such, I have reverted the move. This is your last warning: Stop behaving against policies and guidelines or you will be blocked from editing. Regards SoWhy 21:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Primefac (talk) 21:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry. Is it wrong to move from article namespace to draft namespace?? Those articles are not ready yet to be Wikipedia stand-alone article. Those articles don't have citation needed to justify the subject's notability. Tell me which correct procedure is needed to move article namespace to draft namespace. As far as I know, I see a lot of drafts have been moved from article namespace. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 21:35, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is and you knew that because I told you so a few days ago. Anyway, Primefac has already blocked you by the time I wrote the warning, so it is moot now. I'm sorry to see that you were not willing to listen to multiple experienced editors telling you to stop; unfortunately, a project that lives from collaboration cannot tolerate such behavior. Regards SoWhy 21:37, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Some of those drafts were years old, like Mawi. Really the only acceptable time to move an article to draft is when it's brand-new. NOT when it's years old. Those either get speedied or AFDd Primefac (talk) 21:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)Alexander Iskandar The solution is to heed Ritchie333's advice and stop putzing around with deletion. You just caused a massive mess that others now have to clean up as it's clear you have no idea what you were doing. (Also cc: SoWhy, I restored their block notice but accidentally removed your warning, sorry!) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:39, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict. When I save my replies, your messages lost. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 21:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I thought moving from article namespace to draft namespace is similar to moving article namespace to article namespace. I've been told it is disruptive to rename draft.. Unfortunately, my actions to move articles to draft namespace are not appropriate. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 21:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap. I'm not clear about this policy. Anyone can explain? Alexander Iskandar (talk) 21:50, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexander Iskandar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand why I am blocked for. To prevent me from making disruptive edits. Thanks for telling me the correct procedure. I should nominate those articles to AfD not moving to drafts. I hope admin can unblock me and give me chance to contribute to Wikipedia. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 22:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC) I realise that draftifying is applied to new articles (created in this year 2017) and requires discussion and communication with creators and other active editors. I'm sorry for being too bold in this case. According to Wikipedia:Be bold, Wikipedia community encourages users to be bold when updating the encyclopedia. Sometimes, Wikipedia volunteers is expected to be bold but when conflicts and arguments arises, proper discussion is expected. As an experienced Wikipedia contributor and volunteer, I have common objectives just like other admins and other active contributors and volunteers, to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. If conflict arises because of controversial issues, then it should be discussed and cooperation is expected to achieve general agreement or consensus. Wikipedia:Ignore all rules policy sometimes made things becomes complicated. I respect other admin's commitment to spend their time to revert my inappropriate edits, give explanation in edit summary, give useful advices, suggestions, reminders and warnings in my talk page. I also want to give credits, to acknowledge, and to recognize other active editors who give good cooperation with me since I start editing (especially about Malaysia-related articles, politics-related articles, election-related articles) in this English Wikipedia. I know this block is not punishment but the way to prevent harm and problem to Wikipedia. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 18:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have looked carefully through your edits and the disruption caused clearly crosses the line dividing bad editing from vandalism. Take your redirecting of high school articles, for example. I note that you were redirecting up to three pages a minute, plainly using some type of automated tool. There could have been no effort, because there was no time so to do, to check the articles or to search for sources. These edits are taking countless person hours to revert and the likelihood is that damage will still remain after most of your redirects have been reverted. I see no offer from you to help revert and repair the damage you have caused. I can see no benefit to the Project, and plenty of potential downside, in your being unblocked. Just Chilling (talk) 23:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your moves of articles to draft may have been the last thing, but you have been showing competence problems for a while. You were moving Drafts around. You been told to stay away from speedy deletions because you do not understand the criteria. Many of your Prods have been declined because they are not non-controversial. Now you want to nominate articles using WP:AFD? Have you even looked at the deletion policy? I do not believe unblocking you would be a benefit to the encyclopedia. I think we will be back here in a very short time. ~ GB fan 23:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
While I was writing that comment another AFC submission you made was declined. You did no work to fix the issues that had been identified by previous reviewers but resbmitted it any way. Did you really believe it was ready to be an article? ~ GB fan 23:11, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I should withdraw my AFC submission. Those drafts are not ready to be Wikipedia stand-alone article. Don't have enough reliable sources for verification and non-notable yet. Draft:KEN Holdings Berhad, Draft:CDC Malaysia. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
When I scroll up this talk page today, I see your replies to my questions about moving article to draft namespace. Thanks for replying. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for admins for providing explaination in edit summary and this talk page. I should understand which action is eligible/allowable/permitted and which action is not eligible/not allowable/not permitted. Below is my response to your advices:

  • I agree that Wikipedia is encyclopedia project. Discussion and communication with other editors is important to achieve consensus.
  • Why I made decision to move article to the draft namespace? I believe draft namespace is suitable for collaborative improvement. When they are ready with reliable sources and showing notability, then those drafts are eligible for AfC submission.
    • I quoted from Template:New page, "This page was just created. Its author is familiar with Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines and has done so in good faith. More editing may be needed to meet standards. Please do not rush to mark it for deletion, but check back in a while and/or contact the creator to ascertain his/her plans. If the creator has abandoned work on this page and is not responding to communication, you may consider deleting it or moving it to the draft namespace for collaborative improvement."
    • However, I misunderstood this good faith also applied to articles created before 2015 which are left abandoned by creators, lacking citation needed for verification, showing no improvement by creators and other editors.
  • Many Malaysia-related articles have been tagged BLP sources many years ago, some have been tagged since 2007, 10 years ago. I quoted from Template:BLP sources, "This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous or harmful."
  • Wikipedia accept neutral point of view. How we define neutral point of view? Neutral point of view don't praise or exaggerate something, someone without acceptable proof. Advertising and promotional materials usually manipulating readers from truth. I quoted from Template:Fanpov, "This article may be written from a fan's point of view, rather than a neutral point of view." Alexander Iskandar (talk) 08:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You are very good at finding quotes from pages in the Wikipedia namespace. What you appear to have a problem with is being able to take those quotes and understand how to apply them to editing pages in Wikipedia. We had a discussion above where I had to block you to get you to talk. You pulled out quotes but did not understand when and how they apply. ABove you ask for clarification on the "policy" Redirects are Cheap. You don't seem to understand that is an essay not a policy. I don't think you understand the difference between the two of them either. ~ GB fan 16:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap is essay. This essay is always used as a reason to keep redirects (with typo and honorific title) in Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. Please see this link --> Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 April 18#"Tan Sri" redirects and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 April 18#"Datuk" redirects. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 16:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what is my mistake. Point #3 in the Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap. "On the other hand, cross-namespace redirects make processing Wikipedia content more complex for bots and scripts." Now I know why cross-namespace redirects is disruptive editing and considered as serious and vandalism by admins. It involves technical issue. Cross-namespace redirect is different than keeping or deleting redirect. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 16:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I realise that draftifying is applied to new articles (created in this year 2017) and requires discussion and communication with creators and other active editors. I'm sorry for being too bold in this case. According to Wikipedia:Be bold, Wikipedia community encourages users to be bold when updating the encyclopedia. Sometimes, Wikipedia volunteers is expected to be bold but when conflicts and arguments arises, proper discussion is expected.

As an experienced Wikipedia contributor and volunteer, I have common objectives just like other admins and other active contributors and volunteers, to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. If conflict arises because of controversial issues, then it should be discussed and cooperation is expected to achieve general agreement or consensus. Wikipedia:Ignore all rules policy sometimes made things becomes complicated. I respect other admin's commitment to spend their time to revert my inappropriate edits, give explanation in edit summary, give useful advices, suggestions, reminders and warnings in my talk page. I also want to give credits, to acknowledge, and to recognize other active editors who give good cooperation with me since I start editing (especially about Malaysia-related articles, politics-related articles, election-related articles) in this English Wikipedia. I know this block is not punishment but the way to prevent harm and problem to Wikipedia. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 18:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Competence

I realise that you are blocked. I would like you to appreciate that over quite a short space of time you have made a significant mess of Speedy deletion nominations, prod nominations, article moves and redirects. If you achieve an unblock, which at present is doubtful, it would be better if you were to limit your activity to straightforward editing of articles. You have not shown a meaningful ability to understand the various procedures you have tried to partake in. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advices. I should limit my activity to edit articles, adding citation needed. Refocus to my expertise. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 22:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CDC Malaysia (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Waggie was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Waggie (talk) 23:06, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles are for readers

...so when you again find yourself editing, please remember that a non-existing template that is redlinked in an article, such as the one you keep adding to Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Seksyen 3 Bandar Kinrara, lowers the quality of the article and does nothing to help readers of the article. Please visit WP:Template namespace#Searching for templates and WP:Requested templates for more information. And I sincerely hope you are able to work through your challenges and begin editing again soon.  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  15:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting deletions in Draft space

In case you become unblocked, please note that per this discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability/Archive_58#RfC:_Does_WP:N_apply_to_drafts_in_userspace_or_draftspace.3F, notability guidelines do not apply in Draft space. You made a large number of proposals for deletion in MfD which were not in-scope.Newimpartial (talk) 06:17, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to suggest and recommend this information pages, WP:PERENNIAL to be read by anyone who have doubt and unfamiliar with Wikipedia (including me). This page records the list of rejected proposals with reasons on why those proposals were declined by the community. This page also highlighted the phrase consensus can change when situation is favorable. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 17:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Biblioworm:, your proposal Wikipedia:WikiProject Reforming Wikipedia/Draftifying have long-term benefits for Wikipedia. It is not good and fair to WP:BITE the newcomers/regular editors by deleting their non-notable articles (including articles without or lacking reliable sources/independent secondary sources) as they really spend a lot of valuable time and a great deal of efforts. I quoted from this proposal, "Basically, all general CSD criteria would still be valid reasons for immediate deletion. We would draftify articles that meet current CSD criteria A1, A3, A7, and A9. These "criteria for speedy deletion" would become "criteria for speedy draftification." However, any article that meets criteria A2, A5, A10, and A11 would be speedily deleted as usual. To encapsulate, all general CSD criteria, as well as the A2, A5, A10, and A11 criteria, would remain valid reasons for speedy deletion. A1, A3, A7, and A9 would no longer be valid reasons for speedy deletion, but they would become valid reasons to immediately draftify an article." I also quoted from this proposal, "...(Consider the fact that the Twitter article was initially tagged for speedy deletion per A7. It is now a good article.)..." I know this proposal is not a Wikipedia policy yet and should be discussed and negotiated in WP:GOODFAITH to achieve consensus by Wikipedia community. Consensus is important in Wikipedia.

I quote from WP:BITE, "Wikipedia articles are improved through the hard work of both regular editors and newcomers. Remember: all of us were new editors at Wikipedia once, and in some ways (such as when editing an article on a topic outside our usual scope) even the most experienced among us are still newcomers.

New members are prospective contributors and are therefore Wikipedia's most valuable resource. We must treat newcomers with kindness and patience—nothing scares potentially valuable contributors away faster than hostility. It is very unlikely for a newcomer to be completely familiar with Wikipedia's markup language and its myriad policies, guidelines, and community standards when they start editing. Even the most experienced editors may need a gentle reminder from time to time."

I should avoid making a mess/clutter/chaos of speedy deletion nominations, proposed deletion nominations, article moves and redirects. I should read carefully Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, Wikipedia:Arguments to make in deletion discussions, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes, Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Common outcomes, Wikipedia:Notability. Admins, please consider my unblock request as soon as possible. Best regards. @Primefac:@GB fan:@Just Chilling:@SoWhy:@Anthony Bradbury:@Ritchie333: Alexander Iskandar (talk) 17:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Burning Pillar: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § Delete unreferenced articles. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 19:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not take this question as being any sort of unblock promise. If you were to be unblocked would you agree to limit your editing only to article space, either improving or creating articles, and talk page comments or suggestions?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony Bradbury: I agree to limit my editing to article space, either improving or creating articles, and talk page comments or suggestions. I know that I have made a significant mess of Speedy deletion nominations, proposed deletion nominations, article moves and cross-namespace redirects (from article namespace to draft namespace). Let me quote from Wikipedia:Competence is required, "Where we often see big controversies, though, is with editors who are unintentionally and often unknowingly disruptive while trying to help. This is where we sometimes see an unintended side effect of our (generally quite useful) notion of assuming good faith. Many editors have focused so much on this tenet that they have come to believe that good faith is all that is required to be a useful contributor. Sadly, this is not the case at all. Competence is required as well. A mess created in a sincere effort to help is still a mess.

Clearly, every editor is incompetent when doing some types of edits in certain subject areas, so it is important to know or discover your limitations." Alexander Iskandar (talk) 04:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Just Chilling: I know that I have made a lot of controversial redirects to Malaysian school-related articles without proper discussion. You and other editors may revert my edits to Malaysian school-related articles. Secondary schools generally assumed to be notable to have Wikipedia stand-alone articles, although at this moment, many Malaysian school-related articles lacking reliable sources and independent secondary sources, and many depends on primary sources (respective school website, looks like advertisement and promotional material if secondary sources are not provided to support available school website sources for verification purposes). Actually I want to revert my edits because those schools being redirected to list of schools in X without proper discussion. Since I'm still unblocked yet, any editor may check those page links (Special:WhatLinksHere) below to revert my controversial redirects to list of schools in X after that you may left those school articles with unreferenced tag, refimprove tag, notability tag, NPOV tag, cleanup tag, violation of WP:NOTADVERTISEMENT, violation of WP:NOTDIRECTORY, violation of WP:LINKFARM, violation of WP:NOTGALLERY, WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK, WP:CRYSTALBALL as Wikipedia stand-alone articles which can be easily accessed by readers using Google search engine. I understand that the creators can easily create a lot of those school-related articles and easily left abandoned those articles many years and those school-related articles still unimproved till now. X refers to Malaysian states and federal territories. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 04:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Just Chilling: I appreciate your great deal of efforts and spending your precious time to mass revert my edits to Malaysian school-related articles. What's to do next after mass revert those articles. I hope you and other editors will collaborate to improve those articles by adding reliable sources, independent third-party sources and do not depends solely on primary sources which is respective school website. WP:NOTADVERTISEMENT and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. You and other editors may check page history and communicate with those school-related article creators about how to improve those articles. Our common objective are to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. I hope those articles may have reliable sources and useful to readers when they search about the school in the Google search engine. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 06:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Just Chilling: You can check page history of articles in the Category:Boys' schools in Malaysia and Category:Girls' schools in Malaysia, I put an effort to add this link Kecemerlangan sekolah satu gender as published in the independent reliable source, Utusan Online (not official website) to verify if those schools are notable single-sex schools. By the way, I see your continuous efforts to revert my undiscussed and controversial mass redirects. I don't recommend those articles lacking reliable sources to be deleted using AfD because I appreciate a great deal of efforts by past creators, editors and volunteers contributing to those articles. However, we cannot let those articles lacking reliable sources and may contained disputed information to be remained as Wikipedia stand-alone article because those articles may be viewed by any readers any time if they searched those schools using search engine including Google. Is it useful for readers to read articles with unverified information and no reliable source to verify those informations? I learnt that at this moment Wikipedia cannot accept draftifying articles and mass-redirect articles to draft namespace is disruptive. I aware that although those articles may be deleted by admins, future editors may appeal to restore those deleted articles and start improving those articles. I understand that either keep or delete, either redirect or delete, either inclusionist or deletionist, but not either delete or draft. I know that my controversial mass redirect issue started since last month, April 2017, although I start editing in Wikipedia two years ago. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 13:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After checking Special:WhatLinksHere, I found a few articles still being redirected to List of schools in X and I request that it should be reverted to previous edits if possible.

Below are list of primary schools in Malaysia:


I actually planned to insert Template:Under construction above all list of schools in Malaysian states. Since I already blocked because of draftifying, nominating speedy deletion without valid criterion, nominating proposed deletion to disputed Malaysian entertainer-related articles and also do not revert all my controversial mass-redirect. I have difficult time to work my plan.

@Kurykh: I accept that the discussion outcome was "delete. There hasn't been an articulated reason to merge these articles, while there has been one for deletion." Mass deletion involving MM YYYY in Country/Topic already happened. In case any editors want to merge content from deleted monthly articles into annual articles, they may ask admins and using correct procedure to appeal. I don't move those articles to draft namespace, but I did correct procedure by asking other editor's opinion using AfD discussion platform instead.

I made my mistake last week by making controversial draftifying many Malaysian entertainers-related articles without using AfD discussion platform, WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers talk page, WikiProject Musicians talk page, WikiProject Entertainment talk page. I also made my mistake last week by nominating speedy deletion using invalid criterion, nominating proposed deletion to controversial articles involving Malaysian entertainers-related articles. I also made my mistake last month by making controversial mass redirects involving Malaysian secondary schools without using discussion plattform like AfD, RfD or WikiProject Schools talk page. I realize that discussion is important in Wikipedia if involving mass redirect, mass delete, mass anything else to reach general agreement or consensus by Wikipedia community. I realize that @Just Chilling: already declined my unblock request, so I do not plan to request unblock at this moment, may be next month is appropriate. @Anthony Bradbury:@Primefac: I aware that you don't promise me to unblock me by asking that question. When time is appropriate, I will asking unblock request and contributing back to Wikipedia and follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Status: inactive for a while and take a vacation from Wikipedia activity. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 07:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]