User talk:FilmForum61: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
FilmForum61 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Why you tagged kani kusruthi for deletion ? |
Why you tagged kani kusruthi for deletion ? |
||
[[User:B4blaz|B4blaz]] ([[User talk:B4blaz|talk]]) 17:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC) |
[[User:B4blaz|B4blaz]] ([[User talk:B4blaz|talk]]) 17:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC) |
||
:{{Re|B4blaz}} The page appears to be written as an advert using highly superlative language to describe the person. It sounds like something Kani Kusruthi would like to write about herself instead of a neutral encyclopedic entry. The entire article is littered with random details in a flattering tone. Moreover the notability of these details and of the person herself is highly questionable if we are to accept the same. The article should be rewritten from a neutral standpoint else deleted. Best, [[User:FilmForum61|FilmForum61]] ([[User talk:FilmForum61|talk]]) 17:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:50, 7 December 2016
TALK MY FRIENDS, TALK!
Why you tagged kani kusruthi for deletion ? B4blaz (talk) 17:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- @B4blaz: The page appears to be written as an advert using highly superlative language to describe the person. It sounds like something Kani Kusruthi would like to write about herself instead of a neutral encyclopedic entry. The entire article is littered with random details in a flattering tone. Moreover the notability of these details and of the person herself is highly questionable if we are to accept the same. The article should be rewritten from a neutral standpoint else deleted. Best, FilmForum61 (talk) 17:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)