User talk:Cirt

AFD/T • T-7 • T-8 • T-2 • Relisted • AFDO • WP:DELSORT: Sexuality and gender, Law, Internet, News, Medicine • AFD tool links • WP:DRV • WP:MFD • AIV • RFUB • UAA/CAT • RFPP • PER • CSD • AB • FAR • FAC urgents • TFAR • RSN • BLPN • FTN • GAN Topic lists • Article alerts: Freedom of speech • Human rights • Journalism • Sexology and sexuality • LGBT studies • Feminism • Women • Gender Studies • Women artists • Women's History • Women scientists • Women writers • Medicine • Law • Internet • Internet culture • Comedy • U.S. Supreme Court cases Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report Voorts 79 2 4 98 Open 21:06, 8 November 2024 5 days, 20 hours no report

Two to review

I will review these two for GA candidacy:

1. Spectre (2015 film)
2. Harmy's Despecialized Edition

— Cirt (talk) 03:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

GA on Hold for Spectre (2015 film). — Cirt (talk) 21:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Placed article Harmy's Despecialized Edition as GA on Hold. — Cirt (talk) 01:57, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review

I've listed The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review.

Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise/archive1.

Thank you for your time,

— Cirt (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Emma Stone

After making her article a GA, I have opened a peer review for a possible FAC. If you have some time, consider reviewing it, Wikipedia:Peer review/Emma Stone/archive1. ツ FrB.TG (talk) 17:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Gamaliel and others arbitration case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others. The scope of this case is Gamaliel's recent actions (both administrative and otherwise), especially related to the Signpost April Fools Joke. The case will also examine the conduct of other editors who are directly involved in disputes with Gamaliel. The case is strictly intended to examine user conduct and alleged policy violations and will not examine broader topic areas. The clerks have been instructed to remove evidence which does not meet these requirements. The drafters will add additional parties as required during the case. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Evidence.

Please add your evidence by May 2, 2016, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gamaliel and others/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. This notification is being sent to those listed on the case notification list. If you do not wish to recieve further notifications, you are welcome to opt-out on that page. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

New two to review

New two to review:

1. Der Brænder en Ild
2. Leprechaun (film)

— Cirt (talk) 02:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lie-to-children

The article Lie-to-children you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lie-to-children for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Markworthen -- Markworthen (talk) 14:01, 23 April 2016 (UTC)