Cawood sword: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:54, 24 September 2015

The Cawood sword is a medieval sword discovered in the River Ouse near Cawood in North Yorkshire in the late 19th century.The blade is of Oakeshott type XII and has inscriptions on both sides.

The sword is notable as the best-preserved specimen of a small group of medieval swords with a type M pommel in the typology of Oakeshott (1964). This type of pommel is an apparently specifically British derivation of the Viking Age multi-lobed pommel. It is often found on tomb effigies of the mid 13th to mid 14th century in southern Scotland and northern England,^[1] but it may have been in existence since the 10th century.

A very similar sword, likely form the same workshop, was discovered in Norway in 1888 while railway work was being conducted on farmland at Korsoygarden in Hedmark.

The question of the date of these swords is of some importance for the absolute chronology of the development of sword morphology in medieval Europe. In 1964, Oakeshott stated that while both swords were "long believed" to date to the late 11th or early 12th century, suggested by the "Viking sword"-type pommel and the runic inscription on the Korsoygarden sword, they could not possibly predate the mid 13th century because of the style of the Cawood sword's inscriptions.^[2] However, in 1991, Oakeshott revisited this opinion based on the style of the runic inscription on the Korsoygarden sword. The 12th-century date for both swords is based on this argument.^[3] This, i.e. the combined evidence from the Cawood and the Korsoygarden swords, are of "extreme importance" for the dating of swords and blade inscriptions of the 11th to 12th centuries. Oakeshott (1991) presents a group of eight swords, some of which were previously dated to c. 1300, which based on close morphological parallels to these swords must be re-assigned to the period of c. 1000–1120. Oakeshott's date for the Cawood sword itself is now c. 1100–1150.

The Cawood sword was kept at the Tower of London until the 1950s and then sold into private hands. It was again on display in The Age of Chivalry exhibition at Burlington House in 1987. It was acquired by the Yorkshire Museum, York in December 2007.

References

^ Oakeshott (1964:97)
^ "The Korsoygarden sword, long believed to date to be of late Viking date, is in fact a Type XII. The hilt is almost exactly the same shape as that of the Cawood sword (also a XII), which by the style of the inlaid inscriptions in its blade may be placed with some confidence within a period between perhaps 1240 and 1310. Certainly no earlier than the former. The runes on the Korsoygaden hilt might have been made at any time between 1000 and 1300 (not later). Thus, in spite of being found in a stone coffin with the remains of a circular shield, it seems likely that hte Korsoygaden sword must be of c. 1240-1300, not of c. 1000." Oakeshott (1964:98).
^ "the runes inscribed upon the bronze collars which once held the grip at top and bottom [...] rather roughly incised in a rather 'home-made' style, have been positively dated as being no later than 1150 and unlikely to be much earlier than 1100. These datings have been made by two extremely eminent Runologists, Eric Moltke and O. Rygh, each independently corrobating the other's finding. On stylistic grounds and on the circumstances of its burial, Jan Petersen dated the sword to c. 1050" Oakeshott (1991:76)

Ewart Oakeshott, The Sword in the Age of Chivalry (1964).
Ewart Oakeshott, Records of the Medieval Sword (1991), 76-81.

External links

The Cawood Sword at the History of York project
The Cawood Sword: The Finest Viking Sword Ever Found
Yorkshire Museum and Gardens (2007-12-18). "One thousand year old Viking sword comes home to Yorkshire". Retrieved 2007-12-21.^{[dead link]}
Patrick Kelly, Spotlight: Oakeshott Type XII Swords

[1] Oakeshott (1964:97)

[type_M-2] "The Korsoygarden sword, long believed to date to be of late Viking date, is in fact a Type XII. The hilt is almost exactly the same shape as that of the Cawood sword (also a XII), which by the style of the inlaid inscriptions in its blade may be placed with some confidence within a period between perhaps 1240 and 1310. Certainly no earlier than the former. The runes on the Korsoygaden hilt might have been made at any time between 1000 and 1300 (not later). Thus, in spite of being found in a stone coffin with the remains of a circular shield, it seems likely that hte Korsoygaden sword must be of c. 1240-1300, not of c. 1000." Oakeshott (1964:98).

[3] "the runes inscribed upon the bronze collars which once held the grip at top and bottom [...] rather roughly incised in a rather 'home-made' style, have been positively dated as being no later than 1150 and unlikely to be much earlier than 1100. These datings have been made by two extremely eminent Runologists, Eric Moltke and O. Rygh, each independently corrobating the other's finding. On stylistic grounds and on the circumstances of its burial, Jan Petersen dated the sword to c. 1050" Oakeshott (1991:76)

[1]

[2]

[3]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 The '''Cawood sword''' is a [[medieval sword]] discovered in  the [[River Ouse, Yorkshire|River Ouse]] near [[Cawood]] in [[North Yorkshire]] in the late 19th century.The blade is of [[Oakeshott typology|Oakeshott type XII]] and has inscriptions on both sides.
-The sword is notable as the best-preserved specimen of a small group of medieval swords with a type M [[pommel]] in the typology of Oakeshott (1964). This type of pommel is a late British derivation of the [[Viking sword|Viking Age]] multi-lobed pommel. It is often found on tomb effigies of the mid 13th to mid 14th century in southern Scotland and northern England.<ref>Oakeshott (1964:97)</ref>
+The sword is notable as the best-preserved specimen of a small group of medieval swords with a type M [[pommel]] in the typology of Oakeshott (1964). This type of pommel is an apparently specifically British derivation of the [[Viking sword|Viking Age]] multi-lobed pommel. It is often found on tomb effigies of the mid 13th to mid 14th century in southern Scotland and northern England,<ref>Oakeshott (1964:97)</ref>
+but it may have been in existence since the 10th century.
 A very similar sword, likely form the same workshop, was discovered in Norway in 1888
 while railway work was being conducted on farmland at '''Korsoygarden''' in  [[Hedmark]].
-The question of the date of these swords is of some importance for the absolute chronology of the development of sword morphology in medieval Europe. In 1964, Oakeshott stated that while  both swords were "long believed" to date to the late 11th or early 12th century, suggested by the "Viking sword"-type pommel and the runic inscription on the Korsoygarden sword, they could not possibly predate the mid 13th century because of  the style of the Cawood sword's inscriptions.<ref name="type_M">"The Korsoygarden sword, long believed to date to be of late Viking date, is in fact a Type XII. The hilt is almost exactly the same shape as that of the Cawood sword (also a XII), which by the style of the inlaid inscriptions in its blade may be placed with some confidence within a period between perhaps 1240 and 1310. Certainly no earlier than the former. The runes on the Korsoygaden hilt might have been made at any time between 1000 and 1300 (not later). Thus, in spite of being found in a stone coffin with the remains of a circular shield, it seems likely that hte Korsoygaden sword must be of c. 1240-1300, not of c. 1000." Oakeshott (1964:98). </ref>
+The question of the date of these swords is of some importance for the absolute chronology of the development of sword morphology in medieval Europe.  In 1964, Oakeshott stated that while  both swords were "long believed" to date to the late 11th or early 12th century, suggested by the "Viking sword"-type pommel and the runic inscription on the Korsoygarden sword, they could not possibly predate the mid 13th century because of  the style of the Cawood sword's inscriptions.<ref name="type_M">"The Korsoygarden sword, long believed to date to be of late Viking date, is in fact a Type XII. The hilt is almost exactly the same shape as that of the Cawood sword (also a XII), which by the style of the inlaid inscriptions in its blade may be placed with some confidence within a period between perhaps 1240 and 1310. Certainly no earlier than the former. The runes on the Korsoygaden hilt might have been made at any time between 1000 and 1300 (not later). Thus, in spite of being found in a stone coffin with the remains of a circular shield, it seems likely that hte Korsoygaden sword must be of c. 1240-1300, not of c. 1000." Oakeshott (1964:98). </ref>
 However, in 1991, Oakeshott revisited this opinion based on the style of the runic inscription on the Korsoygarden sword. The 12th-century date for both swords is based on this argument.<ref>"the runes inscribed upon the bronze collars which once held the grip at top and bottom [...] rather roughly incised in a rather 'home-made' style, have been positively dated as being no later than 1150 and unlikely to be much earlier than 1100. These datings have been made by two extremely eminent Runologists, Eric Moltke and O. Rygh, each independently corrobating the other's finding. On stylistic grounds and on the circumstances of its burial, Jan Petersen dated the sword to c. 1050" Oakeshott (1991:76)</ref>
 This, i.e. the combined evidence from the Cawood and the Korsoygarden swords, are of "extreme importance" for the dating of swords and blade inscriptions of the 11th to 12th centuries.