Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:King's College London Chapel 2, London - Diliff.jpg: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:57, 12 June 2015

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2015 at 17:24:15 (UTC)

Reason: The two images of this interesting Grade 1 listed building (the highest level of heritage listing in England) show the interior from opposite ends and are very high resolution, aesthetic and architecturally corrected. It is the work of George Gilbert Scott, one of Britain's most renown Gothic Revival architects and extremely prolific. His article is worth a read if nothing else.
Articles in which this image appears

Support as nominator – Ðiliff «» (Talk) 17:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Personally, I'd prefer one shot or the other. My choice would be the altar-facing one, due in part to the windows. (I wonder what made the short-lived original chapel, mentioned in the article, so unpopular.) Sca (talk) 18:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm okay with the idea of one and not the other being featured if one is not up to scratch, but they are clearly useful together as a set because they illustrate opposing views of the interior. The two of them together shows what one cannot. As for the reason for the original chapel, I have no idea, but it didn't last long. Just 25 years. That's not even long in today's disposable world! Ðiliff «» (Talk) 18:27, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as pair. I see the EV diminished if only one is promoted. Another excellent photograph. Mattximus (talk) 22:22, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Set - Both are of high quality and show different aspects of the church. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 **I'm okay with the idea of one and not the other being featured if one is not up to scratch, but they are clearly useful together as a set because they illustrate opposing views of the interior. The two of them together shows what one cannot. As for the reason for the original chapel, I have no idea, but it didn't last long. Just 25 years. That's not even long in today's disposable world! [[User:Diliff|<font color="#006633">&#208;iliff</font>]]   <font color="#800000">&#171;&#187;</font><small> [[User talk:Diliff|<font  color="#006633">(Talk)</font>]]</small> 18:27, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 *'''Support''' as pair. I see the EV diminished if only one is promoted. Another excellent photograph. [[User:Mattximus|Mattximus]] ([[User talk:Mattximus|talk]]) 22:22, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
+*'''Support Set''' - Both are of high quality and show different aspects of the church.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Chris Woodrich]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 23:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 <!-- additional votes go above this line  -->
 {{-}}