User talk:Hateless: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:25, 14 July 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Hateless, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 08:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Some vandal started your userpage with nonsense. I blanked it, and it might just look better if your name is blue, but if you want me to delete the page outright, just say the word. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 05:57, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About the 'knockout' article.

It's interesting that the NJ state athletic control board has defined knockout, but it's still not mentioned in the rules of the UFC. Got any idea about that?--Marcus 05:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite sure why... although that rules page also leaves out some other rules mentioned on UFC broadcasts, ie. fighters are repositioned as they were on the ground if a ref should call time. I assumed it's mostly because that section of the UFC site is just neglected. hateless 07:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About your "Tsunami Song" AfD Vote

Keep, the Hot 97 controversy was rather major, especially for the Asian American community, and it deserves its own article. I don't have an opinion on whether songs about the tsunami should have an article however. hateless 03:55, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm not proposing that USA for Indonesia be deleted, which is the song surrounding the Hot 97 controversy. I'm proposing that the article about "tsunami song" — which is "songs about the tsunami" — should be deleted. If you have no opinion on that, then you probably wouldn't want to vote either way. — WCityMike (talk • contribs • where to reply) 14:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed delete

Hey, how come you put a proposed to be deleted tag on the article for TC (Artist)? I'm half way through setting it up? Mostly Zen 00:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Is this a hobby of yours? Putting relevant pages forward for deletion after a lot of time and effort has been put in? Evidently so. Tír Eoghain abú 14:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's a fun way for a wannabe bureaucrat like me to kill some time. Sarcasm aside, I've grown quite affectionate toward WP and have an appreciation for the WP's rules and guidelines and the rationale behind the rules. Usually I'm nice and put up a prod tag which can be overturned by anyone, like I did with the fellow above, and leave it alone when problems are fixed. Then there's people like you, who evidently have no respect for the encyclopedia. Do yourself a favor and get a web site going for your school paper, and publish content there instead of here. hateless 16:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Affairs Magazine

In regards to the article Christian Affairs Magazine, which you proposed for deletion, I have marked the article for speedy deletion, as I feel that the article meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion. In cases where it applies, speedy deletion is preferable to proposed deletion. I have left the {{prod}} tag in place, so that if speedy deletion is rejected, your proposed deletion will remain in place. Thanks! Mango juice^talk 13:04, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roentgen Stories

Jumping the gun, aren't we? If you'll check the history of the ROENTGEN STORIES page before posting, you might notice that I only just created it. Currently, I'm in the process of adding content, unless you expect a gorgeous, content-filled page to suddenly pop out of nowhere, fully created.

It's an honest mistake, I suppose, but please check your facts before posting.

Phemeral 07:33, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yasmin Warsame

Hi Hateless. Please check Yasmin Warsame to see if it meets your requirements for removing the cleanup tag.S710 09:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its better, I went ahead and cleaned it up a bit further to make it more in like with the basic biography format. Happy editing... hateless 05:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mainstream urban r&b

I see you placed a prod on this article. You should know that I have speedied it twice as a repost---the original was speedied earlier today---and the author has threatened to continue recreating it. I have reported his actions to an administrator, and hopefully they will do something about him. You should watch and make sure he does not remove the prod tag. ---Charles 17:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Water, which you tagged for speedy

The one film is the least of the problems. Look at the contributions from Rclarkjrndf@aol.com (talk · contribs). Must be a student filmmaker. Neither he or any of his films show up on IMDB. Looks like time for a group AFD. Fan1967 20:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like he's taken the tag off. Fan1967 20:12, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Human-baiting

You may want to participate in these additional votes:

Cordially SirIsaacBrock 01:25, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 The one film is the least of the problems. Look at the contributions from {{user|Rclarkjrndf@aol.com}}. Must be a student filmmaker. Neither he or any of his films show up on IMDB. Looks like time for a group AFD. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan1967]] 20:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 :Looks like he's taken the tag off. [[User:Fan-1967|Fan1967]] 20:12, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
+==[[Human-baiting]]==
+You may want to participate in these additional votes:
+*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monkey-baiting]]
+*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lion-baiting]]
+*[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rat-baiting]]
+Cordially [[User:SirIsaacBrock|SirIsaacBrock]] 01:25, 14 July 2006 (UTC)