Talk:Polar vortex: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Technically Polar cyclones are the transitions of low pressure areas between Aleutian low and Icelandic low, as far as I can see. Some meteorologist may confirm this. Moved the Polar cylone in the template to the annual cyclones section as there is a clear annual rythm of changes with these. How they'll react to the disappearance of the arctic ice is still an unresolved question (ref to nasa image of the day (http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=78808) |
Technically Polar cyclones are the transitions of low pressure areas between Aleutian low and Icelandic low, as far as I can see. Some meteorologist may confirm this. Moved the Polar cylone in the template to the annual cyclones section as there is a clear annual rythm of changes with these. How they'll react to the disappearance of the arctic ice is still an unresolved question (ref to nasa image of the day (http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=78808) |
||
Disappointingly, recent (early January 2014) news reports have gotten the polar vortex exactly backwards, saying it's strengthened (and that's the cause of the brutal cold experienced in the US). This may produce some invalid edits of this article.[[User:Danhicks|drh]] ([[User talk:Danhicks|talk]]) 14:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC) |
Disappointingly, recent (early January 2014) news reports <ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-25609411</ref> have gotten the polar vortex exactly backwards, saying it's strengthened (and that's the cause of the brutal cold experienced in the US). This may produce some invalid edits of this article.[[User:Danhicks|drh]] ([[User talk:Danhicks|talk]]) 14:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:05, 6 January 2014
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Polar vortex article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Template:WikiProject Non-tropical storms Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Large scale?
What does "large scale" mean? The size of a typical Kansas tornado, ten times as large, a hundred? --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 19:18, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Synoptic scale. A wikilink has been added so people can explore what that means. Thegreatdr (talk) 01:05, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Ozone depletion references?
Since the role of CFCs and other factors is still uncertain, some references in this section would be useful. As would fair representation of research showing other factors influencing the ozone 'hole'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.61.210.61 (talk) 22:31, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Added references. Thegreatdr (talk) 01:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Technically Polar cyclones are the transitions of low pressure areas between Aleutian low and Icelandic low, as far as I can see. Some meteorologist may confirm this. Moved the Polar cylone in the template to the annual cyclones section as there is a clear annual rythm of changes with these. How they'll react to the disappearance of the arctic ice is still an unresolved question (ref to nasa image of the day (http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=78808)
Disappointingly, recent (early January 2014) news reports [1] have gotten the polar vortex exactly backwards, saying it's strengthened (and that's the cause of the brutal cold experienced in the US). This may produce some invalid edits of this article.drh (talk) 14:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)