Jump to content

Shire of Mutdapilly: Difference between revisions

Add links
Coordinates: 27°46′19″S 152°36′40″E / 27.772°S 152.611°E / -27.772; 152.611
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→History: more details and putting things into chronological order
→History: added citation about not moving to Mt Walker
Line 8: Line 8:




Having an office in Ipswich (outside of the division) was not very convenient for many council members, ratepayers, and contractors, particularly those living in the southern parts of the division, such as [[Rosevale, Queensland|Rosevale]]. The possibility of relocating the divisional offices to somewhere more central within the division was frequently raised. In March 1890, it was decided to relocate the office to [[Mount Walker, Queensland|Mount Walker]], adjacent to the Mount Walker school. This would put everyone within 9 miles of the office, instead of some people having to travel up to 29 miles to Ipswich.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article125078484 |title=DIVISIONAL BOARD MEETINGS. |newspaper=[[The_Ipswich_Herald_and_General_Advertiser|Queensland Times, Ipswich Herald & General Advertiser (Qld. : 1861 - 1908)]] |location=Qld. |date=1 April 1890 |accessdate=29 December 2013 |page=5 |publisher=National Library of Australia}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article125079072 |title=THE RECENT MEETING AT EBENEZER. |newspaper=[[The_Ipswich_Herald_and_General_Advertiser|Queensland Times, Ipswich Herald & General Advertiser (Qld. : 1861 - 1908)]] |location=Qld. |date=19 April 1890 |accessdate=29 December 2013 |page=5 |publisher=National Library of Australia}}</ref> However, the decision was controversial with many ratepayers arguing that they had to travel to Ipswich to transact other business, but not to Mount Walker, so Ipswich was actually more convenient for them. It was also argued that the difficulties of those in the Rosevale area were over-stated as there were a disproportionate number of members of the divisional board living in that area.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article125079138 |title=Meeting of Mutdapilly Ratepayers at Normanby. |newspaper=[[The_Ipswich_Herald_and_General_Advertiser|Queensland Times, Ipswich Herald & General Advertiser (Qld. : 1861 - 1908)]] |location=Qld. |date=19 April 1890 |accessdate=29 December 2013 |page=6 |publisher=National Library of Australia}}</ref> In June 1890, the divisional board voted to rescind the decision to relocate their office to Mount Walker.
Having an office in Ipswich (outside of the division) was not very convenient for many council members, ratepayers, and contractors, particularly those living in the southern parts of the division, such as [[Rosevale, Queensland|Rosevale]]. The possibility of relocating the divisional offices to somewhere more central within the division was frequently raised. In March 1890, it was decided to relocate the office to [[Mount Walker, Queensland|Mount Walker]], adjacent to the Mount Walker school. This would put everyone within 9 miles of the office, instead of some people having to travel up to 29 miles to Ipswich.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article125078484 |title=DIVISIONAL BOARD MEETINGS. |newspaper=[[The_Ipswich_Herald_and_General_Advertiser|Queensland Times, Ipswich Herald & General Advertiser (Qld. : 1861 - 1908)]] |location=Qld. |date=1 April 1890 |accessdate=29 December 2013 |page=5 |publisher=National Library of Australia}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article125079072 |title=THE RECENT MEETING AT EBENEZER. |newspaper=[[The_Ipswich_Herald_and_General_Advertiser|Queensland Times, Ipswich Herald & General Advertiser (Qld. : 1861 - 1908)]] |location=Qld. |date=19 April 1890 |accessdate=29 December 2013 |page=5 |publisher=National Library of Australia}}</ref> However, the decision was controversial with many ratepayers arguing that they had to travel to Ipswich to transact other business, but not to Mount Walker, so Ipswich was actually more convenient for them. It was also argued that the difficulties of those in the Rosevale area were over-stated as there were a disproportionate number of members of the divisional board living in that area.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article125079138 |title=Meeting of Mutdapilly Ratepayers at Normanby. |newspaper=[[The_Ipswich_Herald_and_General_Advertiser|Queensland Times, Ipswich Herald & General Advertiser (Qld. : 1861 - 1908)]] |location=Qld. |date=19 April 1890 |accessdate=29 December 2013 |page=6 |publisher=National Library of Australia}}</ref> In June 1890, the divisional board voted to rescind the decision to relocate their office to Mount Walker.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article125080045 |title=The Proposed Removal of the Mutdapilly Board's Office. |newspaper=[[The_Ipswich_Herald_and_General_Advertiser|Queensland Times, Ipswich Herald & General Advertiser (Qld. : 1861 - 1908)]] |location=Qld. |date=10 June 1890 |accessdate=30 December 2013 |page=5 |publisher=National Library of Australia}}</ref>


On 25 October 1890, part of the Mutdapilly Division was excised to create the [[Normanby Division]].<ref>{{cite QSA Agency|1450|Normanby Divisional Board|13 September 2013}}</ref>
On 25 October 1890, part of the Mutdapilly Division was excised to create the [[Normanby Division]].<ref>{{cite QSA Agency|1450|Normanby Divisional Board|13 September 2013}}</ref>

Revision as of 21:37, 29 December 2013

Map of Mutdapilly Division and adjacent local government areas, March 1902. Legend: Ipswich Municipality (2), Brassall Division (9), Bundanba Division (10), Normanby Division (13), Rosewood Division (14), Walloon Division (17)

The Shire of Mutdapilly is a former local government area in the south-east of Queensland, Australia.

History

On 11 November 1879, the Mutdapilly Division was created as one of 74 divisions within Queensland under the Divisional Boards Act 1879 with a population of 1809.[1][2] Initially the divisional office was in the Ipswich Railway Station (outside of the division itself).[3]

On 4 January 1884, there was an adjustment of boundaries between No. 2 subdivision of Mutdapilly Division and subdivision No. 2 of the Goolman Division.[4][5]


Having an office in Ipswich (outside of the division) was not very convenient for many council members, ratepayers, and contractors, particularly those living in the southern parts of the division, such as Rosevale. The possibility of relocating the divisional offices to somewhere more central within the division was frequently raised. In March 1890, it was decided to relocate the office to Mount Walker, adjacent to the Mount Walker school. This would put everyone within 9 miles of the office, instead of some people having to travel up to 29 miles to Ipswich.[6][7] However, the decision was controversial with many ratepayers arguing that they had to travel to Ipswich to transact other business, but not to Mount Walker, so Ipswich was actually more convenient for them. It was also argued that the difficulties of those in the Rosevale area were over-stated as there were a disproportionate number of members of the divisional board living in that area.[8] In June 1890, the divisional board voted to rescind the decision to relocate their office to Mount Walker.[9]

On 25 October 1890, part of the Mutdapilly Division was excised to create the Normanby Division.[10]

In March 1891, the division established a new office in Mount Walker.[11]

With the passage of the Local Authorities Act 1902, the Mutdapilly Division became the Shire of Mutdapilly on 31 March 1903. [2][12]

Following some years of protracted discussion and considerable argument, on 4 July 1905, the Shire of Mutdapilly was abolished and absorbed into an enlarged Shire of Rosewood.[12] The rationale for this amalgamation was that the two shires were too small to be economical, with 30% of income going to office expenses; a combined shire was expected to have more funds for roads.[13] The normal shire council elections that would normally have been held at the start of 1905 were delayed pending the finalisation of the amalgamation.[14] The former Mutdapilly Shire would constitute 2 divisions within the new shire, each returning 2 members, while the former Rosewood would constitute 1 division within the new shire, returning 3 members.[15]

Chairmen

John Yates was the chairman of the Mutdapilly Divisional Board on several occasions.[16]

References

  1. ^ "Proclamation [Mutdapilly Division]". Queensland Government Gazette. 11 November 1879. p. 25:991.
  2. ^ a b "Agency ID 1436, Mutdapilly Divisional Board". Queensland State Archives. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  3. ^ "DIVISIONAL BOARDS MEETINGS". Queensland Times, Ipswich Herald & General Advertiser (Qld. : 1861 - 1908). Qld.: National Library of Australia. 18 May 1880. p. 3. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  4. ^ "Proclamation [Mutdapilly Division amended]". Queensland Government Gazette. 5 January 1884. p. 34:20.
  5. ^ "Proclamation [Goolman Division amended]". Queensland Government Gazette. 5 January 1884. p. 34:21.
  6. ^ "DIVISIONAL BOARD MEETINGS". Queensland Times, Ipswich Herald & General Advertiser (Qld. : 1861 - 1908). Qld.: National Library of Australia. 1 April 1890. p. 5. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  7. ^ "THE RECENT MEETING AT EBENEZER". Queensland Times, Ipswich Herald & General Advertiser (Qld. : 1861 - 1908). Qld.: National Library of Australia. 19 April 1890. p. 5. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  8. ^ "Meeting of Mutdapilly Ratepayers at Normanby". Queensland Times, Ipswich Herald & General Advertiser (Qld. : 1861 - 1908). Qld.: National Library of Australia. 19 April 1890. p. 6. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  9. ^ "The Proposed Removal of the Mutdapilly Board's Office". Queensland Times, Ipswich Herald & General Advertiser (Qld. : 1861 - 1908). Qld.: National Library of Australia. 10 June 1890. p. 5. Retrieved 30 December 2013.
  10. ^ "Agency ID 1450, Normanby Divisional Board". Queensland State Archives. Retrieved 13 September 2013.
  11. ^ "SUMMARY OF NEWS". The Brisbane Courier (Qld. : 1864 - 1933). Qld.: National Library of Australia. 6 March 1891. p. 4. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  12. ^ a b "Agency ID 1437, Mutdapilly Shire Council". Queensland State Archives. Retrieved 12 September 2013.
  13. ^ "LOCAL AUTHORITIES' BOUNDARIES". The Brisbane Courier (Qld. : 1864 - 1933). Qld.: National Library of Australia. 9 February 1905. p. 2. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  14. ^ "Rosewood Shire Council". Queensland Times, Ipswich Herald & General Advertiser (Qld. : 1861 - 1908). Qld.: National Library of Australia. 31 January 1905. p. 8. Retrieved 29 December 2013.
  15. ^ "NEW SHIRE OF ROSEWOOD.NEW em BE OF ROSEWOOD". The Brisbane Courier (Qld. : 1864 - 1933). Qld.: National Library of Australia. 30 June 1905. p. 4. Retrieved 29 December 2013. {{cite news}}: Text "." ignored (help)
  16. ^ "CHAIRMAN OF THE ROSEWOOD SHIRE COUNCIL". Queensland Times (Ipswich) (Qld. : 1909 - 1954). Ipswich) (Qld.: National Library of Australia. 5 March 1910. p. 3 Edition: DAILY. Retrieved 28 December 2013.

27°46′19″S 152°36′40″E / 27.772°S 152.611°E / -27.772; 152.611

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shire_of_Mutdapilly&oldid=588268178"