Talk:The Blue Lotus/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Brigade Piron (talk · contribs) 08:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'd be happy to review this one. I have had some very minor involvement with the article, but I still believe myself impartial enough to carry out a decent review. If anyone objects, they can carry on the GAR where I leave off.

My comments to follow, but it's a nicely written article! Brigade Piron (talk) 08:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	The lead should mention that the book is a direct plot follow-on from Cigars. Perhaps consider linking the "Maru" from S.S. Harika Maru to Japanese ship-naming conventions#Merchant ships which explains what it means. Done and done! Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Once the suggestions above are dealt with, I'm very happy to pass it! Brigade Piron (talk) 20:31, 31 August 2013 (UTC)