User talk:Doc James/Archive 37

Archive 30

←

Archive 35

Archive 36

Archive 37

Archive 38

Archive 39

Archive 40

stop being a . . . .

When I first made the edits re. migraine, I asked for help with referencing. According to the link you sent me -- see the section on Books -- my sources are perfectly valid. I added page numbers. Thanks for the tip, it was helpful. Deleting questionable info for legitimate reasons is helpful. Gaming the system to justify deleting objective facts that come from valid sources just because it's information the Great James Heilman isn't familiar with is perhaps less constructive. In other words, you're being a real censored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.213.205 (talk) 06:40, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

The popular press is not a suitable reference. Have stated this a few times. Feel free to ask for a second opinion here WT:MED Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 06:42, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I have tried to shed some light on this situation on the migraine talk page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.213.205 (talk) 11:27, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi let's not flame folk like Jmh649; he's giving up precious time to help the overall value of Wiki, and he's only applying what are clear and open rules. You may be wellmeaning and sensible, but many others would try to put stuff up here might not be. Give him some help, he's doing a good and highly valuable work here. (JCJC777 (talk) 13:25, 25 November 2012 (UTC))

Agreed. I call a toast. Biosthmors (talk) 17:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Read your edits

With this edit, you left the sentence "The drug is, and is taken orally in capsules or as a suspension." Please check your edits for grammar before you save them and move on. » Swpb^{τ • ¢} 15:22, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for correcting it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:59, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Heading

Hello..You are editing my addition while I am working on it. I was working ion my references when you removed my entire entry. It would be nice if you waited for me to complete my work before correcting it. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medicinechief (talk • contribs) 00:55, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Please advise what you mean by improper formatting of my addition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medicinechief (talk • contribs) 01:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Your edits have been moved to your talk page. Please work on them their and get consensus before re adding. Thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:16, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urinary tract infection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diaphragm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Formatting issues with Pain Mechanism addition

Hello Doc James,

Please advise me ion the formatting issues with my addition. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medicinechief (talk • contribs) 01:28, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Changes to Pain mechanism

Hello Doc James,

I have made the changes. Please revies. Thanks.

Medicinechief (talk) 01:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Typo

I meant: Please Review

Medicinechief (talk) 01:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Addition to Pain Mechanism

Hello Doc James,

I will be glad to provide updated references as you requested. Please explain the difference between primary and secondary references. Thanks.

Medicinechief (talk) 06:15, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Sure secondary source are review articles or major textbooks typically while primary research are the actual studies in question. This is a great resource for finding them [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 06:38, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi James and Medicinechief. This new theory may not have been subjected to scholarly review in a peer-reviewed journal yet - I couldn't see evidence of it on my first look.

Medicinechief, Wikipedia medical content is very strictly constrained by policies and guidelines. My first impression of your contribution is that it doesn't presently conform to our medical sourcing guideline. I'll read it again tomorrow and discuss it with you on your talk page if you like. I've been editing medical articles here for four years and have a fair grasp of the relevant policies and guidelines. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 13:46, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Done --Anthonyhcole (talk) 09:17, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

• News and notes: Toolserver finance remains uncertain

• Recent research: Movie success predictions, readability, credentials and authority, geographical comparisons

• Featured content: Panoramic views, history, and a celestial constellation

• Technology report: Wikidata reaches 100,000 entries

• WikiProject report: Directing Discussion: WikiProject Deletion Sorting

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 10:29, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for advice on editing

I will read WP:GA and other follow suggestions by you and other editors. I am editing in an area of great controversy, involving the drug suppliers of psychiatric drug addicts possibly being in error in making liftime diagnoses based on questioable methodologies. No matter the prevalence as a percentage of the population, their total numbers are huge, and emotions are very high when questioning the deepest concerns of an individual, those of their own minds. ParkSehJik (talk) 21:07, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Yes it is a very controversial area of medicine. Best to use more neutral language than stuff like "drug suppliers of psychiatric drug addicts".Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 04:56, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Merging the articles Applied behavior analysis and Behavior modification

Hi,
I wanted input back on merging the articles ABA and Behavior mod., as the former is a new term for the latter.
See here: Talk:Applied_behavior_analysis#Merging_the_articles_Applied_behavior_analysis_and_Behavior_modification.
Thanks!
ATC ^{. Talk} 04:41, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC this Saturday Dec 1

Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC

You are invited to Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC, an editathon, Wikipedia meet-up and workshops focused on film and the performing arts that will be held on Saturday, December 1, 2012, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at Lincoln Center), as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events being held across the USA.

All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and at meetup.com!--Pharos (talk) 07:21, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

removal of brand name due to copy right

dear friend

i have remove the brand name of neogab due to copy right protection.

i hope that you will understand and will not revert the change which i made.

regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.27.243.146 (talk) 16:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Not sure what you refer to? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:14, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle

December 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited

Seattle Public Library

Date Saturday, December 8, 2012 Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104 Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand. Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki. Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration. Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:50, 1 December 2012 (UTC)